FRIHOSTFORUMSFAQTOSBLOGSDIRECTORY
You are invited to Log in or Register a Frihost Account!

Ubuntu ?

 


jainakshay040
Hello linux users and new bies!


Ubuntu is the best operating system in this soft-world i think so


The ten bst thing s


1 No virus! yes no need to fear and also to run hours of virus scans!
2 easier than windows/Mac in UI-user interface
3 Easiest setup and fast too!
4 No need of Drivers for basic hardwares included
5 Full functionality to office work, as included open office org Which is the best open source productivity suite!
6 Included many useful packages like - Gimp image editor -an altenative of adobe photo sho and this one is Free!,.and many many
7 .Easy Remote access ! Connect Your ubuntu machine from anyone with the inbuilt remote desktop feature!
8.Super graphics and sound uality with ALSA and other linux video enhance ments
9 Fastest os! Turns a Old machine in P4!
10 Finaly Reduces Cost of a PC and Gives you complete peace of mind being free!
HamsterMan
One could probably make a list of contradictory arguments, but Ubuntu is still an awesome operating system.
LostOverThere
I'm sorry to say, but all of those points either are opinions or apply to Linux in general. Confused
cavedog2
Yes. It kinda does. So for new linux users I would recommend Ultimat Edition. It's based on ubuntu but its already customized for you! Like skinz added and wine installed. Its super. i would recommend that linux to any 1 wanting to try out linux! Here is the link! http://www.ultimateedition.info
kansloos
A small misunderstanding, a full feature-rich Gnome system is generally a little slower as Windows XP.
LostOverThere
Ultimate Edition...you can't be serious. Neutral
kitsrock
i must agree with the feature rich gnome being slightly slow.

but i think it has improved over the years, and maybe it'll be better.

i thought about changing to kde, or maybe even go further and change it into icewm or xfce, but then i got really lazy and opted to go for upgrade in hardware.
swizzy
Quote:
1 No virus! yes no need to fear and also to run hours of virus scans!

Mac is equally safe, so are other unix distros

Quote:
2 easier than windows/Mac in UI-user interface

Win XP/Mac seem to be much more easier for many users...

Quote:
3 Easiest setup and fast too!

The install CD takes upto 10 mins, and the DVD used to take around 30 mins. Mac 10.5.2 takes 20 mins to install on a MacBook (with all bundled software), and XP takes >40mins.

Quote:
4 No need of Drivers for basic hardwares included

Almost all printers, graphics devices, and even minor hardware had mac drivers bundled with them, very few of them had linux support

Quote:
5 Full functionality to office work, as included open office org Which is the best open source productivity suite!

I disagree, Office 2008 is the most polished and most useful yet.

Quote:
6 Included many useful packages like - Gimp image editor -an altenative of adobe photo sho and this one is Free!,.and many many

Gimp, Seashore, Photoshop, are all supported natively on Mac

Quote:
7 .Easy Remote access ! Connect Your ubuntu machine from anyone with the inbuilt remote desktop feature!

Mac/XP seem to have the best sharing features available

Quote:
8.Super graphics and sound uality with ALSA and other linux video enhance ments

Mac had better sound Shocked

9 Fastest os! Turns a Old machine in P4!
10 Finaly Reduces Cost of a PC and Gives you complete peace of mind being free!

9,10 are the only i agree with you Razz
mehulved
kansloos wrote:
A small misunderstanding, a full feature-rich Gnome system is generally a little slower as Windows XP.

Well you're comparing an OS released in 2002 to one released in 2008, there's bound to be differences. Even if you consider XP SP2, GNOME is slightly heavier but still there's a difference of good 4 years between their releases. I haven't tried XP SP3 so can't say anything about it.
But, when you compare it with Vista SP1 you will definitely see ubuntu having an edge, maybe a slight one(I don't have benchmarks as I don't use either).
Though your statement is true, it's a bit misleading if not explained properly.
kansloos
kitsrock wrote:
i thought about changing to kde, or maybe even go further and change it into icewm or xfce, but then i got really lazy and opted to go for upgrade in hardware.


KDE is even slower, XFCE and IceWM are faster but don't offer as much features and even then Xorg itself is a little slow
kitsrock
kde is slower? damn. i thought it was just gnome that was slow.

yeah, it's true xfce and icewm has less features, but i don't mind going minimalistic.
Fire Boar
I prefer KDE myself, and with a bit of tweaking it's the most useable desktop environment out there.

Remember: Ubuntu is not an operating system, it is a distribution of the Linux operating system. Linux 2.6.24 in fact. So, let's see about each point, taking Ubuntu Gnome, Kubuntu KDE and Linux in general.

1. No viruses. This is a common point about Linux. Quite simply, Linux is designed to be as secure as you make it. There are no back doors, no security holes beyond what you make. Of course, running everything as root is going to make you die horribly. Ubuntu/Kubuntu is good here in that it enforces the use of sudo/gksudo/kdesudo to perform administrative tasks, and automatically sets a random root password which it doesn't tell you (although you can still do sudo passwd to set the root password to whatever you want).

Really, it's only Windows that suffers from viruses because of poor design choices early on in the security department.

2. This really depends on the desktop environment and distribution, and here I agree. For Ubuntu/Gnome, the interface is well laid out and things do what you expect them to do. For Kubuntu, it's not quite so clear but in Hardy Heron the System Settings panel is in the right place, and it doesn't take long to figure out how to customize it. Once customized, your system will be even better than Gnome, simply because YOU decide everything. For Linux in general, I tend to disagree, however, performing complex tasks is made very easy through use of Bash, which is MUCH easier to use than DOS.

3. Setup is really very easy for this distribution. You can also customize every aspect of mounting your filesystem, or just opt for guided partitioning. This stuff is pretty standard for Linux distributions, and makes dual-booting with Windows or another operating system easy. Setup is also very fast. The bad thing is that Ubuntu takes over the MBR all the time, so the last installed 'buntu system will be in control of Grub. This is often desirable, but not always in more complex systems.

4. Apart from proprietory drivers like nvidia-glx, pretty much everything you'll need is set up from the go. Most distros use kernel module probing, (K)Ubuntu included, which makes boot times slower but eliminates the need to install drivers in most cases. Sometimes you'll need to use ndiswrapper for wireless drivers because they're all just so varied, which can be a bit of a faff, but apart from that it's fine. With Ubuntu especially, things tend to "just work".

That said, compiling your own kernel with only the modules for hardware you need built in can be a very good option. It makes the kernel size smaller and speeds up boot times a lot. The disadvantage? You have to configure it which is quite difficult to do, and if you change the hardware on your computer you'll need to compile another one.

5. Open Office vs. MS Office? Open Office any day, since it's cheaper and doesn't feature the new interface that MS Office 2008+ features. Microsoft failed hard with their latest Office offering.

6. GIMP isn't fantastic, but it's pretty good. The software is pretty universal across distributions, you can install any Linux software on any distribution. It's just what comes packaged in, and whether it is useful or bloat. Ubuntu is quite good at only including what you're likely to need, although I question Kubuntu's decision to make Konqueror the default web browser and Dolphin the default file manager - it ought to be Konqueror as the file manager and Firefox as the browser, with Dolphin left out entirely.

7. Remote access is definitely a class where Linux shines. Very very easy indeed. SSH is perfect for most remote tasks, giving access to a shell on that machine wherever you are. Combined with the Screen program it's possible to have two people looking at the same terminal, which is very nice. And there's remote desktop facilities too.

8. Linux can potentially look very nice. It depends on what your graphics card can do, what desktop environment you're using, etc. etc.

9. It's fast and can do many tasks very quickly. However, bootup times for Ubuntu are not very impressive, thanks to two things. Firstly the kernel module feature, and secondly the fact that all boot files are spread out across the hard disk instead of blocked at the beginning like on Windows. NTFS and FAT, although they fragment very easily, are faster when dealing with multiple files because the mechanical parts on the disk don't have to move very far to reach the next file. ext2 and ext3 spread the files out across the disk, which is great for avoiding fragmentation but awful for booting up a machine. However, boot times still rival and in many cases overtake Windows.

10. Perfectly true. Everything's open source, you're not relying on a corporation's word, and you don't have to worry about TC (Trusted Computing, or as most FOSS supporters put it, Treacherous Computing).
LostOverThere
kitsrock wrote:
kde is slower? damn. i thought it was just gnome that was slow.

yeah, it's true xfce and icewm has less features, but i don't mind going minimalistic.


Yeah, I thought GNOME was slower then KDE too.

Both This and This are old but might provide a little insight into the issue.
frih
you cant say so because there are lots more OS available. i think you should also check them.


But ubuntu is a very good OS. it comes free of cost. they provide free shipping. they are really doing good work...
hofodomo01
This is one of the nicer distros I've used. The only real gripe about it is that it contains so much bloat and extra crap along with everything else. Still a nice linux distribution nonetheless, but makes me feel like I'm using windows vista all over again...
sondosia
I also really like Ubuntu and have been using it for months without switching back, but I think I'll still try some other distros sometime. All linux distros have something great about them, after all. It's LINUX. =)
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Computers -> Operating Systems

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2007 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.