FRIHOSTFORUMSSEARCHFAQTOSBLOGSDIRECTORY
You are invited to Log in or Register a Frihost Account!

EU Agrees to Reduce Airline Emissions from 2012

 


inphurno
Carriers will be able to meet pollution-reduction quotas by reducing emissions or buying credits from other industries

Quote:
EU environment ministers meeting in Brussels on Thursday (20 December) agreed that restrictions should be put on carbon dioxide emissions from air planes from 2012.

Under the proposal, all airlines coming to and leaving the EU bloc of 27 member states, as well as intra-EU flights -- will be included in an emission trading scheme, something that has already been applied to other polluting sectors in the Union.

Airlines would be able to meet pollution-reduction quotas either by reducing their own emissions or buying credits from other industries.

Several environment ministers welcomed the proposal, pointing to the symbolic effect of the decision just after an international climate change meeting in Bali last week in which the EU took a strong position in persuading other countries to commit to long-term green goals.

"This is a bold step by Europe -- in the week after the Bali agreement -- which shows the EU leading in the fight against dangerous climate change," said Hilary Benn, British Environment Secretary.

But green groups and MEPs in the European parliament have strongly criticised the deal for being too week, with the aviation sector the fastest growing pollutant source in the transport sector.

The share of transport in carbon dioxide emissions was 21 percent in 1990, but had grown to 27 percent by 2005.

"If environment ministers get their way, the scheme simply won't cut emissions, and will end up being yet another subsidy to the aviation industry. It's a shameful end to a year filled with promise for action on climate change," said João Vieira, of green lobby group Transport and Environment.

"This is a Christmas gift to the aviation industry which should be required to do its fair share in tackling climate change," said the WWF.

Meanwhile, deputies in the European Parliament are angry that the ministers watered down their proposal and vowed to make them toughen it up when the legislation passes through the EU assembly for a second time next year.

MEPs had proposed that the scheme start in 2011 and also suggested that the greater climate impact of aviation -- when compared to ground sources -- should be reflected in the trading scheme.

EU deputies also said restrictions should be tight enough to force airlines to reduce their emissions rather than just buy pollution credits from other sectors.

"The European Parliament as co-legislator will not accept that this weak decision comes

into force unchanged", said Peter Liese, German centre-right MEP in charge of the dossier in the EU assembly.

Although it is too weak for some, the proposal is still likely to rile the US which has threatened the EU with legal action if it pushes ahead with the plans.

In addition, it comes just a day after the European Commission sparked controversy by proposing that all new cars must cut CO2 emissions by 2012 or face fines.


http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/dec2007/gb20071221_038021.htm?chan=globalbiz_europe+index+page_top+stories

Everyone talks about the America's emissions but when you look at the EU as a block they are emissions leaders as well. its good that they are taking a "leadership role" and greenhouse gas emission trading schemes are probably going to be one of the most impotant tools to help reduce emissions. it will help companies monetize emissions and therefore assign it a cost which is the only thing multinationals understand.
Bikerman
That is not a fair or reasonable way to measure emissions. Europe is much more densely populated than the US.
The fairest measure to use for most purposes is per capita emissions (ie how much per person).
By this measure the US has a figure of about 20 metric tons of CO2 per person per year.
For comparison the average for Europe would be around 8.5
inphurno
neither is sustainable, so i'm not saying that the eu nations arent better i'm just saying that its not a competition at who's the worst. the EU is for sure leading the way in setting standards/targets but we cant only single out the Americans, every country in the west is contributing to greenhouse gas emissions so we are all in this together.
MaxStirner
Having heard so many accusations by all sides of who is doing or not doing what to save the environment, it would probably be best for everyone to keep their own porch clean first. The restrictions on aircraft emissions we adopted in the EU were a great disappointment to a large number of people (including myself). Not only for most of the reasons mentioned at the top of this thread, but also because we have seen these plans of emission-bartering come and go, and (almost) none of them have had any meaningful impact. In Germany, parts of of the legislature governing industrial emissions have been traced to documents supplied directly by said industries, so all they really managed is to assure us that lobbying is alive and well in the European Union.

Max (<-- still in every (other) way pro-EU³)
Related topics

Japan urges world to cut emissions 50% by 2050
Car emissions
Carbon credit mechanism
ob_start("ob_gzhandler")
Why can't we make alternative fuel vehicles a priority?

Al Gore´s video
Can we create ice berg?
global warming
whatsyourimpact.co.nr
Airport Tax

...all religion aside - is it wrong to be gay?
Kyoto?? Bah! China Blows by USA in CO2 Emissions.
Global Warming.... Truth or Lie?
Global Warming? are we at worlds end?
Many religious leaders back climate-change action
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Lifestyle and News -> Discuss World News

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2007 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.