1 to suggest it in the suggestions forum
5 to agree that the light bulb needs changing
3 to disagree and who claim to like the light bulb the way it is
1 mod to say that he agrees that the light bulb needs changing but it isnt a priority
4 to pass comment on the light bulb even though they dont have an opinion but because their points are in the negative
1 mod to point out that the changing of the light bulb was suggested in 2005 and is on the "not to suggest" list and close the thread.
I usually hate these kind of jokes but this time it seems so familiar to me.
What about adding:
1 Site Admin to agree to change the light bulb.
(2 years later) 1 Site Admin still plans to change the light bulb *soon*
And let's not forget....
27 disgruntled frihosters to report the lightbulb topic as spam
29 other posters to backseat moderate and call out the topic as spam
4 posters to correct the spelling/grammar of the lightbulb topic
1 very smart frihoster who pm's Bondings and has him actually change the @#$%! thing.
Good rework of a classic joke. The "how many _____ to change a lightbulb?" works well for any situation!!!
Enjoyed it, thanks for sharing!
lmao, nice call truespeed. it seems we can all relate to this, regardless of our personal objectives with our webspace, forum involvement, etc.
I really liked the joke, and reading what other people posted as a response to the original joke, but I feel that one point got made but not enough laughs...
39 negative point posters to use the topic to get their score up by discussing in detail every option known to man for changing a light blub no matter how far fetched the idea might be...hey, it's points.
BTW, I am one of those who actually tries to voice my opinion by coming up with good and interesting topics. Hense my point value suffering at times...I refuse to cheat.
haha very witty.
Made me smile at any rate
hehaheh... maybe we should call chuck norris at first
lmao i like this joke alot i found it really funny lol