Singapore's goverment has been selling very hard to get her people to be re-employed when they reach their retirement age.
Yet, there are journalists that support the voice of the government and also echo their sentiments and their experience with employment agency.
So the secret from the government and from the agencies is?
"Dream of been able to extend beyond your retirement age."
As I read the many articles in the Straits Times in Singapore, it can be very confusing.
If one finds it hard to get a job in the 40s and 50s, how many will need to consider re-employment in the 60s?
Share your views on working beyond retirement age.
Yet, there are journalists that support the voice of the government and also echo their sentiments and their experience with employment agency.
- Highly sought after
Early 20s - Cheap and good
In the 30s - Management positions and wealth of experience
Highly avoided
In the 40s - can be replaced by those in the 20s and 30s
In the 50s - should have retired
Highly RE-EMPLOYABLE (Of course this is the government dream - may be just dream)
In the 60s - dream fo been highly re-employed
So the secret from the government and from the agencies is?
"Dream of been able to extend beyond your retirement age."
As I read the many articles in the Straits Times in Singapore, it can be very confusing.
If one finds it hard to get a job in the 40s and 50s, how many will need to consider re-employment in the 60s?
Share your views on working beyond retirement age.
