yes evry body can have his own pohilosophy but not in the academic sens
my philosophy : think while leaving by heart and reason and self respect and others same
... That's so deep 
.
Keep up the good work . (and it's idd. not in the academic sense) Ah...typos and grammar errors galore.
That run-on sentence just about killed me.
My head is spinning 
It would be easier for me to see this post seriously if you actually took the time to make it something worth reading.... hah, I try to post as serious as I can but no one understands me just the same... 
I have to say I just don't understand what's being said....
and it's not just the bad grammar.
| lesamisdunet wrote: |
yes evry body can have his own pohilosophy but not in the academic sens
my philosophy : think while leaving by heart and reason and self respect and others same |
you know, it would have taken you a meager 5 seconds more to check your spelling..
but that aside, i don't get your philosophy!
may God bless you. | loyal wrote: |
| lesamisdunet wrote: | yes evry body can have his own pohilosophy but not in the academic sens
my philosophy : think while leaving by heart and reason and self respect and others same |
you know, it would have taken you a meager 5 seconds more to check your spelling..
but that aside, i don't get your philosophy!
may God bless you. |
I wouldn't throw stones loyal... I mean, how many more seconds would it have taken you to properly capitalise your sentences?
If we're going to take the time to post we should at least make some attempt to understand what is being said, instead of just criticising spelling and grammar. There's really no need to do that, is there? Here's how I interpret what lesamisdunet is saying:
"Philosophy" can have more than one definition. For example:
| Quote: |
1. Love and pursuit of wisdom by intellectual means and moral self-discipline.
2. Investigation of the nature, causes, or principles of reality, knowledge, or values, based on logical reasoning rather than empirical methods.
3. A system of thought based on or involving such inquiry: the philosophy of Hume.
4. The critical analysis of fundamental assumptions or beliefs.
5. The disciplines presented in university curriculums of science and the liberal arts, except medicine, law, and theology.
6. The discipline comprising logic, ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, and epistemology.
7. A set of ideas or beliefs relating to a particular field or activity; an underlying theory: an original philosophy of advertising.
8. A system of values by which one lives: has an unusual philosophy of life. |
Lesamisdunet is choosing to use the term here in the personal sense, as in number 8 above, not in the academic sense, as in number 2.
Lesamisdunet's personal philosophy is that we should live using our head and our heart (by thinking things out, but also by feeling what is right) and that we should respect ourselves and others equally.
Sounds like a good philosophy to me. Lesamisdunet, thanks for posting your thoughts and please correct me if I'm wrong in my interpretation.
Take care,
Eyvind | Eyvind wrote: |
I wouldn't throw stones loyal... I mean, how many more seconds would it have taken you to properly capitalise your sentences?
|
Lol touche! But then again i am using laptop (i usually use a comp) with a broken 'm'.
| Quote: |
If we're going to take the time to post we should at least make some attempt to understand what is being said, instead of just criticising spelling and grammar. There's really no need to do that, is there? |
I honestly didn’t understand what he was saying.
[quote]
Here's how I interpret what lesamisdunet is saying:
"Philosophy" can have more than one definition. For example:
| Quote: |
1. Love and pursuit of wisdom by intellectual means and moral self-discipline.
2. Investigation of the nature, causes, or principles of reality, knowledge, or values, based on logical reasoning rather than empirical methods.
3. A system of thought based on or involving such inquiry: the philosophy of Hume.
4. The critical analysis of fundamental assumptions or beliefs.
5. The disciplines presented in university curriculums of science and the liberal arts, except medicine, law, and theology.
6. The discipline comprising logic, ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, and epistemology.
7. A set of ideas or beliefs relating to a particular field or activity; an underlying theory: an original philosophy of advertising.
8. A system of values by which one lives: has an unusual philosophy of life
Lesamisdunet is choosing to use the term here in the personal sense, as in number 8 above, not in the academic sense, as in number 2.
Lesamisdunet's personal philosophy is that we should live using our head and our heart (by thinking things out, but also by feeling what is right) and that we should respect ourselves and others equally. . |
Ah! Now I get it. That’s a good way to live our life. But I wouldn’t call it a philosophy…I’d say that’s just how all those who are true-hearted know how to live their life.
Peace. | lesamisdunet wrote: |
yes evry body can have his own pohilosophy but not in the academic sens
my philosophy : think while leaving by heart and reason and self respect and others same |
It seems that many of you fail to understand that this forum is not exlusivley inhabited by Americans or other English speakers, but by people from many different cultures, religions and philosophies.
There a people from Europe and the Nordic Countries, China, India, Thailand and more. They have different cultures, languages and religious beliefs.
What lesamisdunet actually said, if you took the time to read it and made the effort to understand it is (in plain English):
"Yes, everybody can have their own philosophy, but not in the academic sense. My (personal) philosophy is: Think, while living by the desires of your heart and by reason, and respect yourself. And everybody else should do the same."
A bit like the "Wiccan Rede" or the "Golden Rule" I suppose. At least that's how I read it. In other words, follow the desires of your heart within reason, and respect yourself.
I have to say that's a good philosophy to live by. Even Jesus Christ taught this philosophy. You certainly can't love and respect others if you don't love and respect yourself. If you go against your own grain, you'll feel guilty and dislike yourself.
Anyway, let's show some tolerance people. This forum is popluated by people from all over the world, which is what makes it so great. So before you crit someone's English, let's hear your Chinese, Hindi or Thai! | Tiger wrote: |
Anyway, let's show some tolerance people. This forum is popluated by people from all over the world, which is what makes it so great. So before you crit someone's English, let's hear your Chinese, Hindi or Thai!
|
Woah woah everyone's thinking i was attacking lesamisdunet because of his english? No such thing. I was lightly-hearted just finding things funny.
I'm sure lesamisdunet is a great person.
Peace. | missdixy wrote: |
Ah...typos and grammar errors galore.
That run-on sentence just about killed me.
My head is spinning
It would be easier for me to see this post seriously if you actually took the time to make it something worth reading.... |
Thanks for saying what I was thinking...I actually cannot understand what was said due to all of it. I didn't even read through the responses, truth be told, since I thought msot of the responses would be from people who somehow did decipher it...people who type in similar manners. | loyal wrote: |
| Eyvind wrote: |
I wouldn't throw stones loyal... I mean, how many more seconds would it have taken you to properly capitalise your sentences?
|
Lol touche! But then again i am using laptop (i usually use a comp) with a broken 'm'. |
Aha! If your 'm' is really broken then how did you type the letter 'm'?
| Quote: |
| But I wouldn’t call it a philosophy…I’d say that’s just how all those who are true-hearted know how to live their life. |
Well, I think it still qualifies as a philosophy by definition. I mean, it is "a system of values by which one lives" even if it is not codified anywhere outside the person's own heart and mind. But I do like the way you put it: how those who are true-hearted know how to live their life. Well said.
| loyal wrote: |
| Woah woah everyone's thinking i was attacking lesamisdunet because of his english? No such thing. I was lightly-hearted just finding things funny. |
Sorry for that, loyal. I didn't mean to give the impression that you were attacking lesamisdunet. I was just trying to make the point that there was no reason for people to jump into the discussion with nothing but: "Your grammar sucks. I don't understand what you're saying!". No one tried to understand what was being said, nor did anyone think to ask kindly for clarification (which is what ticked me off the most, actually). Nothing but irrelevant criticisms and flat statements. What's the point in that?
| Tiger wrote: |
| Anyway, let's show some tolerance people. This forum is popluated by people from all over the world, which is what makes it so great. So before you crit someone's English, let's hear your Chinese, Hindi or Thai! |
In all fairness, Tiger, I don't think people missed the possibility that the original post was written by a non-native speaker. But I'd wager that a good deal of the incomprehensibility springs from an overall apparent lack of effort on the part of the original poster. The abbreviated, hurried feel of the post as well as the typo-ish nature of some of the spelling mistakes, eg. "pohilosophy", seem to suggest this may be the case. I figure it's actually the poster's lack of effort that people are criticising, not his/her lack of skill in English.
Take care,
Eyvind
thanx | Eyvind wrote: |
Aha! If your 'm' is really broken then how did you type the letter 'm'?
|
Lol...magic!!! (actually copy and paste!).
| Quote: |
Sorry for that, loyal. I didn't mean to give the impression that you were attacking lesamisdunet. I was just trying to make the point that there was no reason for people to jump into the discussion with nothing but: "Your grammar sucks. I don't understand what you're saying!".
|
Sorry
| Quote: |
No one tried to understand what was being said, nor did anyone think to ask kindly for clarification (which is what ticked me off the most, actually). Nothing but irrelevant criticisms and flat statements. What's the point in that?
|
I wrote "i don't understand" so that someone would explain. And someone did
What should i take care of :S?
may God bless you! | loyal wrote: |
| What should i take care of :S? |
Your houseplants... your pets... your delicate unmentionables... Just kidding. Take care of yourself, I guess. It's just a way to sign off... kinda like saying "peace". | Eyvind wrote: |
| loyal wrote: | | What should i take care of :S? |
Your houseplants... your pets... your delicate unmentionables... Just kidding. Take care of yourself, I guess. It's just a way to sign off... kinda like saying "peace". |
LOL...i'll be sure to watch out for your posts cos they are good for making me chortle....by the way, i don't have any pets. Almost no houseplants. But i do have delicate unmentionables!
Take care!
Peace!
And every other saying!My philosphy is bit complex but clear again...
See just believe in god and take god as one ..
god the almighty created us and can destroy us so just take it and never ever do anthing against any religion.. follow ur religion if u can and if not dont critisize others for doing dat!!
dats all.. live and let live happily all!!
thank you all for the entertainment
yeah it was hard to understand but the heart of the message came through -
my philosphy....?
-sings- aalll ya need is love, aaall ya need is love, aaaallll ya needd is love..love....
love is all ya need. 
