FRIHOSTFORUMSSEARCHFAQTOSBLOGSCOMPETITIONS
You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!


Do you believe in Aliens ?





nappa
I've seen these Alien things from TV, radio, pictures, newspapers, etc.
Just curious what you guys thinking about it. Have any of you guys seen them for real ?

Do you think this is one of US top secret? And of course are there really area 51?
Vladalf
Take a look at this: http://atinyglimpse.ytmnd.com/
Do you think in this huge universe there aren't aliens? I believe that god made us but I still think there's something out there. But really if there are aliens, I don't think they are killers like in the movies, maybe they are nice and friendly...
Insanity
I agree. The universe is so unimaginably huge that there must be at least some other form of intelligent life out there. However, even if there were aliens in other galaxies, we might never know, due to our limited knowledge of space and space travel.
matliw
I don't think it is a matter of belief but rather our lack of evidence. Its not totally incredible but I can't imagine contact.
Interesting books about contact with alien intelligence is Stanislaw Lem's "Solaris" (1961) and even more insightful "Fiasco" (1986, trans. 1987).
_jarl_
Of course I do believe in aliens; I am an alien !
Revvion
I believe that they exist somewhere out there. If there friendly or not i dont know, but i dont expect to meet them anytime soon anyway
Coclus
I think they exist, although looking totally different from what we can imagine.
Jakob [JaWGames]
I believe that it probably exists other lifeforms in other parts of the universe but I don't think that they have to be carbon based.

I don't believe in aliens in the way many movies shows them. Why would a lifeform become green with pearshaped heads and huge black eyes?
nappa
Jakob [JaWGames] wrote:
I believe that it probably exists other lifeforms in other parts of the universe but I don't think that they have to be carbon based.

I don't believe in aliens in the way many movies shows them. Why would a life form become green with pear shaped heads and huge black eyes?


Very simple answer. The reason why aliens always have that look in the movie is because they were captured by people in the US long time ago.

I've read some of it in the books when I was young. The books display pictures of the aliens that people had captured. The aliens exactly have that look!.

However it still arguing through out the world if the pictures are real or not.
For me, it looks pretty real to me.

The books also said that the aliens, well all of them was transform to clay or mud after 15 minutes being outside on the earth.

I will go and look around for those books in my parents' house, hope I can find it to show you guys. It's been a long time since I was kid and I'm not really sure if I can find them.

Wish me good luck Wink
Jakob [JaWGames]
nappa wrote:
Jakob [JaWGames] wrote:
I believe that it probably exists other lifeforms in other parts of the universe but I don't think that they have to be carbon based.

I don't believe in aliens in the way many movies shows them. Why would a life form become green with pear shaped heads and huge black eyes?


Very simple answer. The reason why aliens always have that look in the movie is because they were captured by people in the US long time ago.

So you do seriously believe in green things which has been captured by USA? Rolling Eyes

No nappa, I can almost assure you that USA not have captured weird green men and some kind of ship which looks like a disc. The whole green-man thing is with a big probability something build by us humans.

Sorry if that sounded rude, who knows, I may have wrong?
The Conspirator
nappa, just cause something is said in a book, that doesn't means real.
The government is not hiding aliens. There isn't any evidence that aliens have ever even visited the earth.
hereme
they exist,but we should find the way.
nappa
Jakob [JaWGames] wrote:
nappa wrote:
Jakob [JaWGames] wrote:
I believe that it probably exists other lifeforms in other parts of the universe but I don't think that they have to be carbon based.

I don't believe in aliens in the way many movies shows them. Why would a life form become green with pear shaped heads and huge black eyes?


Very simple answer. The reason why aliens always have that look in the movie is because they were captured by people in the US long time ago.

So you do seriously believe in green things which has been captured by USA? Rolling Eyes

No nappa, I can almost assure you that USA not have captured weird green men and some kind of ship which looks like a disc. The whole green-man thing is with a big probability something build by us humans.

Sorry if that sounded rude, who knows, I may have wrong?


hahaha no, I'm not seriously believe in green things which has been captured by USA.

If I'm so sure about it why would I posted it here. I just said I've seen it and the book was somewhere in my parents house. That's all.

This is the open question with no answer anyway, just wanna know what you guys think. Wink
nappa
hereme wrote:
they exist,but we should find the way.


the way to do what? marry them? Very Happy
Jakob [JaWGames]
nappa wrote:
Jakob [JaWGames] wrote:
nappa wrote:
Jakob [JaWGames] wrote:
I believe that it probably exists other lifeforms in other parts of the universe but I don't think that they have to be carbon based.

I don't believe in aliens in the way many movies shows them. Why would a life form become green with pear shaped heads and huge black eyes?


Very simple answer. The reason why aliens always have that look in the movie is because they were captured by people in the US long time ago.

So you do seriously believe in green things which has been captured by USA? Rolling Eyes

No nappa, I can almost assure you that USA not have captured weird green men and some kind of ship which looks like a disc. The whole green-man thing is with a big probability something build by us humans.

Sorry if that sounded rude, who knows, I may have wrong?


hahaha no, I'm not seriously believe in green things which has been captured by USA.

If I'm so sure about it why would I posted it here. I just said I've seen it and the book was somewhere in my parents house. That's all.

This is the open question with no answer anyway, just wanna know what you guys think. Wink

Aah, sorry, I misunderstood you Smile

We put it like this: In my opinion it is a very low probability that those things are correct with the reality. Wink
Tyger
I think there is, probably not green and with 5 eyes. But space in unlimited, how can we say that there's no other life in it than us?
spinout
So checking this probability thinking....

If the space is so large it's like infinite or very close, then the probability is most certatin 100% that smart life exist out there...

Hm, so have they gotten here? I must say that mankind is so stupid that the most smart ones are (must be) smarter than us... well, just by watching us they must think we are so stupid... Do they intend to travel here, to 'dumb-land', by free will? Hm, well If they could they must have been here for a long long time... even it it takes some time some of us would travel to another planet, so they must have...

So I guess we are a bit infiltrated then? or? Can't be since we are still so stupid... or... Are there here to help? Or is this atlantis take 2 ???
Jakob [JaWGames]
spinout wrote:
So checking this probability thinking....

If the space is so large it's like infinite or very close, then the probability is most certatin 100% that smart life exist out there...

Hm, so have they gotten here? I must say that mankind is so stupid that the most smart ones are (must be) smarter than us... well, just by watching us they must think we are so stupid... Do they intend to travel here, to 'dumb-land', by free will? Hm, well If they could they must have been here for a long long time... even it it takes some time some of us would travel to another planet, so they must have...

So I guess we are a bit infiltrated then? or? Can't be since we are still so stupid... or... Are there here to help? Or is this atlantis take 2 ???

Universe is not infinite but it's a good point that it probably exists some kind of intelligent lifeforms other that us in the universe.

I don't believe that some kind of aliens have infiltrated earth. The highest possible speed to travel in universe is as you probably know the speed of light. If you want to get faster between two points you have to use some other kind of way to travel like wormholes and I find it quite unlikely that a civilization have existed long enough to develope this in our chaotic universe.

But another interesting thought is, if there exist intelligent lifeforms in space, must they be carbon-based oxygen-breathing like us or are they built in some other way? In a way we can't imagine?
tekanubis
I do believe there are oxygen(to an extent at least) breathing aliens somewhere in space. I don't believe we've ever contacted and I don't believe that they are that intelligent. ie some sort of more primitive animal probably.
miacps
Evidence of alien lifeforms may be in the bible, if the bible holds any credibility or accuracy that is. Back in that time beings would come from the heavens surrounded by bright light. In that time humans couldn't comprehend what this thing was so a reasonable thing to call it would be a God or an angel. Strange that so many sepperated races of people would all have religions that were based around these kind of beings that would come from the sky. If you were to look at this logically, the conclusion would be that they were alien life forms.
Sharpie
Ummm.. were talking about science not religon. Doesn't hold any credibility with me cause I'm athiest. Sorry for any of you hardcore Religon people.

Anyway, of course there is alien life. Heck, they say there may be even in freaking Jupiter. Bugs only of course but that is still life. Hell there are millions and billions of planets that are probably better suited to hold life then Earth. We just have to find them. Problem is were going to waste all our resources and die before we can get good enough technology to actually do this in my view.
sabe
If there are aliens why would they look @ us? If they can travel over light years or over time why would they let us look at them?

It's like us looking at something under a microscope. If they are advanced enough to get here they probably be advanced enough not to be seen. The other possibility is that they want to be seen and are playing with our minds. They are probably laughing at us and making some sort of alien jokes.

If someone did find one. I'm sure they would have sold it on e-bay by now. You can find everything else.

Today who ever finds anything would sell the movie wrights, write a book and sell small pieces or the blankets that covered them on e-bay.

Evidence is key. The same goes with Yettie (sp?) etc.
socialoutcast
I suppose the area of Alians and UFO's uncertain. Some people strongly believe they are out there and even seen or touched them. Other's would say there is now chance and we are alone in the universe.

Well, my opinion stems from the lack of tangible evidence. I "believe" there is a possiblitly of life somewhere outside of Earth, but I'm not going to try and convience anyone that there are alians or not. Besides on such an ambigious topic I think the word "believe" is important to remember.
DRXX
I think we are not the only ones in the universe.

According to NASA's pictures taken on Mars, I believe so.

Maybe Aliens are lurking on other planets that NASA can't be bothered visiting..
ssthanapati
nappa wrote:
I've seen these Alien things from TV, radio, pictures, newspapers, etc.
Just curious what you guys thinking about it. Have any of you guys seen them for real ?

Do you think this is one of US top secret? And of course are there really area 51?


Aliens may be there but i cant agree with u. Moreover area 51 is in USA. It cant be that alins dont visit other countries or other parts of the world
sabe
socialoutcast wrote:
I suppose the area of Aliens and UFO's uncertain. Some people strongly believe they are out there and even seen or touched them. Other's would say there is now chance and we are alone in the universe.

Well, my opinion stems from the lack of tangible evidence. I "believe" there is a possibility of life somewhere outside of Earth, but I'm not going to try and convience anyone that there are alians or not. Besides on such an ambigious topic I think the word "believe" is important to remember.


I do believe in the possibility of alien life. I was just commenting about the likelihood of us seeing them or them letting us see them visiting our planet. You know those little grey guys. Wink If there is life I can be as rudimentary as bacteria or viruses.
Hogwarts
DRXX wrote:
Maybe Aliens are lurking on other planets that NASA can't be bothered visiting..

NASA puts much research into their projects. They don't wake up in the morning and think "Let's go explore Saturn!" or "Let's go explore some planet extremely far away that'll take us millions of years to reach with our current technology!" - Yep - You're a genius.

In an infinitely sized universe like this, I find it hard to image that there aren't aliens. I don't believe that aliens go around "probing" people, though.

Sabe wrote:
If there are aliens why would they look @ us?

Why do we study nomadic tribes?

Tekanubis wrote:
I do believe there are oxygen(to an extent at least) breathing aliens somewhere in space. I don't believe we've ever contacted and I don't believe that they are that intelligent. ie some sort of more primitive animal probably.

Actually, I'm positive there are aliens more intellegent then us. "More primitive animal"? Take out the "More" and you can sum up our entire race in that phrase, in my opinion. We discriminate against each other, we hate each other, we kill each other, we fight each other.. Some "primitive" tribes are more advanced then us, in my opinion.

Anyway.. Look at Bondings.. He's an alien! Smile
illegalhost
Aliens. Aren't we all aliens? Do i know you? Do you know me? Are we speaking the same language? Are we of the same status? Are we from the same country? I think this alien thing is being blown out of portion. Who cares if there are any aliens outside when we are killing ourselves mentally and physically on Earth?? Aliens would be scared of us rather than we scared of them! If aliens do exist, i do hope that they can help us to settle our problems here on Earth. And maybe we can also help to settle their problems if any on their planet.

Let me start of by saying,"Hello Aliens! Welcome to Earth! Now, are you rich? Or are you white/grey/blue? Are you dangerous?? Cuz we sure are glad if you could help!"
nappa
Hogwarts wrote:
DRXX wrote:
Maybe Aliens are lurking on other planets that NASA can't be bothered visiting..

NASA puts much research into their projects. They don't wake up in the morning and think "Let's go explore Saturn!" or "Let's go explore some planet extremely far away that'll take us millions of years to reach with our current technology!" - Yep - You're a genius.

In an infinitely sized universe like this, I find it hard to image that there aren't aliens. I don't believe that aliens go around "probing" people, though.

Sabe wrote:
If there are aliens why would they look @ us?

Why do we study nomadic tribes?

Tekanubis wrote:
I do believe there are oxygen(to an extent at least) breathing aliens somewhere in space. I don't believe we've ever contacted and I don't believe that they are that intelligent. ie some sort of more primitive animal probably.

Actually, I'm positive there are aliens more intellegent then us. "More primitive animal"? Take out the "More" and you can sum up our entire race in that phrase, in my opinion. We discriminate against each other, we hate each other, we kill each other, we fight each other.. Some "primitive" tribes are more advanced then us, in my opinion.

Anyway.. Look at Bondings.. He's an alien! Smile


There are one thing I'm always curious. Why people always think that aliens are smarter than us? Just a question though. Is it because of the movie or is it because of what?
ptolomeo
I think that alliens are a good way to make money by entertaining people. I like very much alliens pictures but think not any one is approximately true. It is like that old futurist pictures with flying cars in the year 2000. Think the little green man is a nice logo. If alliens exist it wont be as we imagine.
The Conspirator
nappa wrote:

There are one thing I'm always curious. Why people always think that aliens are smarter than us? Just a question though. Is it because of the movie or is it because of what?

Well, if aliens have the technology to travel many light years to get here, then they must be smarter than us. Though not necessarily more intelligent.
What I don't like is the idea that aliens would be more peaceful than us. The idea being that if they are violent they would have destroyed them selves. But we humans are violent and we are still hear and we have only used nuclear weapons n anger twice and never again (theres a point where a weapon gets too powerful and people just don't use it.).
nappa
I think if we consider parasite or some kind of very small living, then there are aliens out there on the moon and other planets. If heard that they found some kinds of those small parasite on some planets.

I think H2O is what most needed in term of life. Therefore if there are H2O then there will be plants and that leads to some other living creature.

Water and plants!
Hogwarts
nappa wrote:
There are one thing I'm always curious. Why people always think that aliens are smarter than us? Just a question though. Is it because of the movie or is it because of what?

Firstly: If they can make it to our planet, they're most likely smarter then us.
Secondly: If there are aliens in the universe, there would almost definitely not only be one type. Seeing as the universe is infinite, there is quite possibly billions of different types of alien-inhabited-planets. There's a one in a million chance that we're the smartest. Go figure.
karysky
I believe in aliens.

I don't believe they come on earth in their spaceships.

The so-called UFO's are secret human prototypes according to me.
Dalv87
I think it's possible, basically anything is, but extremely unlikely. The second Earth-like planet they found does increase the likelihood, but the odds that life would develop are incredibly small.
Utsav
Yes, of course.

1 time, somehow, I had the 'Top Secret' book from the Area 51 of US.
Actually it was an ebook with everything desctibed about aliens and UFOs.

But, due to some fault, my PC for formatt and since then, I didn't found that e-book anywhere.

But, yes. I really had that book and so I believe that Area 51 is having some aliens secrets in it.
The Conspirator
Dalv87 wrote:
The second Earth-like planet they found does increase the likelihood, but the odds that life would develop are incredibly small.

Actually we don't know if the planet that was found is earth like. We know that its the right size and distance from its star but the rest we don't know. It could be like mars, it could be like Venus.
kcwilli
I think that there may be life on other planets but just microbes if anything. No green monsters and the like.

Here's an interesting article about extreme microbes that can live at really hot or cold temps and make a living off rocks and other harsh conditions.

Microbes are awesome!
Studio Madcrow
Of course aliens exist. I have no idea what they look like or where they are, but it's almost inconceivable that we're the only one's out there.
miacps
Sharpie wrote:
Ummm.. were talking about science not religon. Doesn't hold any credibility with me cause I'm athiest.

Thats a pretty narrowminded view. Correct me if I'm wrong but haven't certain events written about in the bible been proved to have happened?

Back when written language was being created and "perfected", what would you really have of interest to write about? The answer would be phenomenons people have observed. It only makes sense that if your understanding was the earth is flat and you had no comprehention of there being anything more than stars and a moon in the sky then if you were to witness strange lights and beings coming from the sky, you would make a name for them.

Since a beleif in beings coming down from the heavens is widespread among many cultures who had never come in contact with each other, is it not possible that alien life forms have at one time visited or at least flew over earth and that the people back then recorded the phenomenon in written language calling them Gods or angels?

Just for the record, I don't beleive in a God. My previous post was far from a religious statement, infact most religious people might take offense to what I suggested.
Ducksteina
I think there definitely are aliens in the space.
The universe is gigantic. It's highly unlikely that there isn't a planet which is similar to the earth and contains simple livings.
However, I don't think aliens will ever reach the earth.
First of all, there is no earth-like planet in millions and millions of lightyears. Even if we traveled with light-speed, it would last like 100 years before they reach us or we reach them.
Secondly, I think it's highly unlikely that these aliens are developped enough to ever contact us.

So my opinion is: There are aliens, but they will never reach the earth in any way.
EanofAthenasPrime
nappa wrote:
I've seen these Alien things from TV, radio, pictures, newspapers, etc.
Just curious what you guys thinking about it. Have any of you guys seen them for real ?

Do you think this is one of US top secret? And of course are there really area 51?


I'm making a game...like I know aliens on a planet with twice as much more gravity than Earth's would be robust, but I need some concepts. In theory do most dominant species tend to be hominids? (Covenant Elites, humans, T-rexes, etc. 2 arms, 2 legs)
EanofAthenasPrime
The Conspirator wrote:
nappa wrote:

There are one thing I'm always curious. Why people always think that aliens are smarter than us? Just a question though. Is it because of the movie or is it because of what?

Well, if aliens have the technology to travel many light years to get here, then they must be smarter than us. Though not necessarily more intelligent.
What I don't like is the idea that aliens would be more peaceful than us. The idea being that if they are violent they would have destroyed them selves. But we humans are violent and we are still hear and we have only used nuclear weapons n anger twice and never again (theres a point where a weapon gets too powerful and people just don't use it.).


You have to realize that many of those type of movies are full of metaphorical situations, ie. smart people really don't buy into the "lets pretend aliens are smarter than us" crap. Those movies are primarily designed for the public to show them that humans can do better. Secondly if you were a terrorist that wanted to commit suicide, why not use a nuke and kill everybody? If you are the terrorist I strongly suggest that you try to make the world a perfect place before annihilating it. The universe doesn't have that many life sustaining planets.
The Conspirator
EanofAthenasPrime wrote:
The Conspirator wrote:
nappa wrote:

There are one thing I'm always curious. Why people always think that aliens are smarter than us? Just a question though. Is it because of the movie or is it because of what?

Well, if aliens have the technology to travel many light years to get here, then they must be smarter than us. Though not necessarily more intelligent.
What I don't like is the idea that aliens would be more peaceful than us. The idea being that if they are violent they would have destroyed them selves. But we humans are violent and we are still hear and we have only used nuclear weapons n anger twice and never again (theres a point where a weapon gets too powerful and people just don't use it.).


You have to realize that many of those type of movies are full of metaphorical situations, ie. smart people really don't buy into the "lets pretend aliens are smarter than us" crap. Those movies are primarily designed for the public to show them that humans can do better. Secondly if you were a terrorist that wanted to commit suicide, why not use a nuke and kill everybody? If you are the terrorist I strongly suggest that you try to make the world a perfect place before annihilating it. The universe doesn't have that many life sustaining planets.


1. I didn't mention any movies.
2. Terrorism comes into this where?
SonLight
nappa wrote:
There are one thing I'm always curious. Why people always think that aliens are smarter than us? Just a question though. Is it because of the movie or is it because of what?


If an alien race actually did come to visit us, we would have to assume their technology is more advanced than ours. It is highly improbable that any intelligent life exists on other planets in the Solar system, and the obstacles to traveling between stars are daunting enough to us that we cannot reasonably expect we will travel to another star system in the next few centuries.

There is no inherent reason why beings from another place would be more advanced than us, but if they travel here they have demonstrated skills and persistence beyond what the human race currently has.
EanofAthenasPrime
The Conspirator wrote:
EanofAthenasPrime wrote:
The Conspirator wrote:
nappa wrote:

There are one thing I'm always curious. Why people always think that aliens are smarter than us? Just a question though. Is it because of the movie or is it because of what?

Well, if aliens have the technology to travel many light years to get here, then they must be smarter than us. Though not necessarily more intelligent.
What I don't like is the idea that aliens would be more peaceful than us. The idea being that if they are violent they would have destroyed them selves. But we humans are violent and we are still hear and we have only used nuclear weapons n anger twice and never again (theres a point where a weapon gets too powerful and people just don't use it.).


You have to realize that many of those type of movies are full of metaphorical situations, ie. smart people really don't buy into the "lets pretend aliens are smarter than us" crap. Those movies are primarily designed for the public to show them that humans can do better. Secondly if you were a terrorist that wanted to commit suicide, why not use a nuke and kill everybody? If you are the terrorist I strongly suggest that you try to make the world a perfect place before annihilating it. The universe doesn't have that many life sustaining planets.


1. I didn't mention any movies.
2. Terrorism comes into this where?


He said nukes will never again be used.
The Conspirator
EanofAthenasPrime wrote:
The Conspirator wrote:
EanofAthenasPrime wrote:
The Conspirator wrote:
nappa wrote:

There are one thing I'm always curious. Why people always think that aliens are smarter than us? Just a question though. Is it because of the movie or is it because of what?

Well, if aliens have the technology to travel many light years to get here, then they must be smarter than us. Though not necessarily more intelligent.
What I don't like is the idea that aliens would be more peaceful than us. The idea being that if they are violent they would have destroyed them selves. But we humans are violent and we are still hear and we have only used nuclear weapons n anger twice and never again (theres a point where a weapon gets too powerful and people just don't use it.).


You have to realize that many of those type of movies are full of metaphorical situations, ie. smart people really don't buy into the "lets pretend aliens are smarter than us" crap. Those movies are primarily designed for the public to show them that humans can do better. Secondly if you were a terrorist that wanted to commit suicide, why not use a nuke and kill everybody? If you are the terrorist I strongly suggest that you try to make the world a perfect place before annihilating it. The universe doesn't have that many life sustaining planets.


1. I didn't mention any movies.
2. Terrorism comes into this where?


He said nukes will never again be used.


I didn't say they would never be used again,I pointed out that they where used twice during the same war when they where new and not sense. Plus, too destroy the world, civilisation, humanity with nuclear weapons you would need a global nuclear war. A single or a few nukes are not enough. In other words to wipe out humanity (or any other intelligent species at, near or above our level of technology) you would need a situation like the height of the cold war if it had went hot. Even then that wouldn't unnecessary men the end of humanity, yes in the country's treacly involved (USA Soviet Union, Britten, France, Germany, China and so on) but in the rest of the would people would be killed off by nuclear winter and humans could have (if it had happened) patently survived it (though in the tens (and possible hundreds) of thousands but thats enough for humanity to survive and after a few thousand years reinvent all that had been lost and surpas it.
EanofAthenasPrime
Actually it only takes one nuke to end all life on Earth
The Conspirator
Even the most powerfull nuke ever made is far from being that powerfull.
fx-trading-education
I think that it is probable that other life exist in the universe because considering it's size it's possible that the conditions needed for life exist somewhere else that on earth.

but of course I don't think that if life exists somewhere else:
- it will be "human like" (all the aliens in movies are looking more or less like humans, that doesn't make sense)
- they are able to contact us, because they are too far away.

So anyway it doesn't change anything so basically I don't bother.
EanofAthenasPrime
The Conspirator wrote:
Even the most powerfull nuke ever made is far from being that powerfull.


Actually 1 nuke could destroy our atmosphere and the sun would burn us to a crisp.

Secondly in movies aliens look like humans cuz
1. Low funding
2. Low creativity
2. On earth dominant species are always hominids (T-rex, humans)
The Conspirator
A fan of Planet of the Apes 2?

No. The most powerful nuke ever made was a few megatons, more than enough power to destroy the largest of city's and cause millions to get cancer and millions of birth defects but to wipe out humanity you would need a millions of megatons and you can not destroy the atmosphere.
EanofAthenasPrime
hmmm....maybe I should go on wikepedia a research this...I'll type in "Could nukes destroy Earth?"
CMA
Yes, with the countless amount of galaxies/planets out there, it's hard to believe that this was the only planet to develop life. So I do believe that aliens might exist, farther or nearer that we might know. Our solar system is so small (nine planets) that judging this subject from these nine alone doesn't make much sense.

nappa wrote:
I think H2O is what most needed in term of life. Therefore if there are H2O then there will be plants and that leads to some other living creature.

Water and plants!


See, this is what I can't accept when I get on this subject with friends or whatever. Is water and/or oxygen REALLY necessary for there to be life anywhere?

Sure, Earth developed in a way that all living beings need these two elements to live, but that's because there are plenty of both everywhere on our planet, so the living beings of Earth don't have to bother with producing these themselves within our bodies, and we can instead get them from the outside.

Now think about this...

On another far away planet, why can't there be living beings that breathe sulfur, for instance? Sulfur is considered toxic to us, but is it hard to imagine that another race that's nowhere near Earth would need it to live? If that planet's atmosphere was rich in sulfur, it'd only make sense. And why not any other element, which may or may not be found on Earth? Better yet, would it be odd to imagine that they don't need to breathe at all and their bodies can manage all the elements needed for them to live?

Consider the huge variety of life forms on Earth. You cannot compare a human to a tree, or a whale to a spider. There are millions of life forms on our planet alone. Why is it that these "aliens" would forcibly be humanoid? They could be large squids... They might be like nothing we've ever seen before... And they may or may not be smarter that us, and they may or may not be able to speak. Even if they'd have the technology to travel billions of light years and visit our planet, BUT their knowledge would be limited to that, would that really mean that they're smarter than us?
nappa
CMA wrote:
Yes, with the countless amount of galaxies/planets out there, it's hard to believe that this was the only planet to develop life. So I do believe that aliens might exist, farther or nearer that we might know. Our solar system is so small (nine planets) that judging this subject from these nine alone doesn't make much sense.

nappa wrote:
I think H2O is what most needed in term of life. Therefore if there are H2O then there will be plants and that leads to some other living creature.

Water and plants!


See, this is what I can't accept when I get on this subject with friends or whatever. Is water and/or oxygen REALLY necessary for there to be life anywhere?

Sure, Earth developed in a way that all living beings need these two elements to live, but that's because there are plenty of both everywhere on our planet, so the living beings of Earth don't have to bother with producing these themselves within our bodies, and we can instead get them from the outside.

Now think about this...

On another far away planet, why can't there be living beings that breathe sulfur, for instance? Sulfur is considered toxic to us, but is it hard to imagine that another race that's nowhere near Earth would need it to live? If that planet's atmosphere was rich in sulfur, it'd only make sense. And why not any other element, which may or may not be found on Earth? Better yet, would it be odd to imagine that they don't need to breathe at all and their bodies can manage all the elements needed for them to live?

Consider the huge variety of life forms on Earth. You cannot compare a human to a tree, or a whale to a spider. There are millions of life forms on our planet alone. Why is it that these "aliens" would forcibly be humanoid? They could be large squids... They might be like nothing we've ever seen before... And they may or may not be smarter that us, and they may or may not be able to speak. Even if they'd have the technology to travel billions of light years and visit our planet, BUT their knowledge would be limited to that, would that really mean that they're smarter than us?


If the living things are not built with H2O or any carbon components then builf with what? I'm just curious. Yeah I think there are some other sources too, but don't know what they are since living things in this world normally have H2O and carbon.
GSIS
I believe that something has already visited this planet - may still be visiting - and will continue to do so.

Whatever it is, whether it's alien, inter-dimensional, or time-traveller is open to serious speculation. Either it hides itself extremely well, or proof of its existence is only available to the most powerful of humans.

I don't believe that it is any threat to us - and it may even have helped us develop to where we are now.

If its purpose is benign its existence will become common knowledge when we are ready at cultural, religious and technological levels. If its purpose is control it will never make itself known other than to those it needs to control humanity.

If its purpose is benign our development of interstellar and intergalactic space travel will be allowed to develop at our own pace with, perhaps, some nudging in the right directions. If its purpose is control it will sabotage and destroy our attempts for many hundreds - possibly thousands - of years.
fx-trading-education
GSIS wrote:
I believe that something has already visited this planet - may still be visiting - and will continue to do so.

Whatever it is, whether it's alien, inter-dimensional, or time-traveller is open to serious speculation. Either it hides itself extremely well, or proof of its existence is only available to the most powerful of humans.


He he that is funny. Why do you believe so? Do you just believe because you don't see anything?

It remembers me a story about pink elephants (but it can work with aliens as well)
One guy says to an other: I have invented a powder against the pink elephants.
The other guy replies: but there are not pink elephants!
Then the first guy: you see it works !
GSIS
I think this way because there has, for generations, been hints. There has, also, been a lot of deception on both sides of the 'do they exist' argument. On the whole, though, I think that given the size of the universe the existence of none-Earth intelligent life is far more probable than improbable.

I think that it would be highly presumptuous to believe that we are entirely alone in the universe. It's extremely likely, in such a vast universe, that many civilisations have existed, currently exist, and will exist that far exceed our current capabilities as far as interstellar and intergalactic space travel (or perhaps even time travel) are concerned.

It does not necessarily require a vastly superior intellect to achieve these things - what it does require is willpower, incentive, time and patience. Few people thought, just 100 years ago, that space travel was anything other than a work of fiction. What can we achieve in the next 1000 years? Yet, surprisingly, Modern Man's IQ is little different to that of Stone Age Man.

Mass extinction of the dinosaurs was a chance event that gave mammals a world in which to evolve. If that chance event had not occurred it's likely that life on Earth would be vastly different to what we now experience. Some dinosaurs were already - at that time - living in groups and cooperating with each other. Would they have started using tools, building permanent homes instead of nests, started bartering food, teaching their offspring, wanting their offspring to live a better life than they did ... ? Who knows - but it certainly seems that something would have taken the lead. Lucky for us it was us (eventually)!

What have other none-Earth civilisations achieved in the millennia they may have had available to them?
KronikSindrome
I certainly hope aliens exists, because if they don't then my implants must be government issued...

I don't like that idea.....

if you like aliens check out my aliens and oddities: http://www.koz.frih.net/ALIENZ/Alienz.html

I think it's rather likely if they do exist they aren't more intelligent than us,
or even As intelligent. That always bothers me in movies, like with Starship Troopers...
Intelligent BUGS? chya....and flying pigs.
fx-trading-education
GSIS wrote:
I think this way because there has, for generations, been hints. There has, also, been a lot of deception on both sides of the 'do they exist' argument. On the whole, though, I think that given the size of the universe the existence of none-Earth intelligent life is far more probable than improbable.

I think that it would be highly presumptuous to believe that we are entirely alone in the universe. It's extremely likely, in such a vast universe, that many civilisations have existed, currently exist, and will exist that far exceed our current capabilities as far as interstellar and intergalactic space travel (or perhaps even time travel) are concerned.


I agree that considering the size of the universe it is possible that there is life somewhere else, but I don't agree about that "they" are visiting us.
Because still considering the size of the universe, it is very very unlikely that they could end up here, because first they should have the technology to do it and then they will have to come to Earth that is nothing in this big universe. So why come here, there should be much more interesting things to do.
Bannik
well in a huge universe why cant there be alien life forms that can travel through space and time....or galaxy alone can potentially have many inteligent lifeforms...but no one will ever believe it (some people would be badly hurt if there are more then one life form Exclamation coughreligioncough Exclamation )
dirkvb
For me aliens are somewhere in the universe. But the universe is so big that the change we will meet an alien is little. The universe has no borders everybody says. Of course is the change they meet us to little.

But for me they exist.
Peterssidan
I beleave that it can be life on other planets but not like those in films. not likely anyhow. more like something that are like plants but more fluid.
powers1983
Anybody who thinks that Earth is the only planet in the universe to have developed intelligent life is deluding themselves. No matter how pessimistic you may be you must be able to see that the shear size of the universe means that the chances of there being only 1 planet to support life is extremely small.

It's a bit like the Loch Ness monster - some people are adamant it exists, some scoff at the very thought. But nobody knows for sure. And it is unlikely that we will ever be really sure. Unless it is found it will never be disproved to everyones satisfaction - even draining the Loch will just result in people saying it must have escaped through the tunnels into the sea.
The same is true with aliens - it is relatively easy to prove (if contact is made for example) but it will never be disproved. Never ever.

It takes someone with a very big ego to declare that we are the only intelligent species, or even that we are the most intelligent. We don't even know of all the species on our own planet, much less in our own solar system and certainly not on any others.

As to whether they live among us then try thinking what we would do if we had the technology to mingle with a more 'primitive' species? We'd be in straight away and try and enslave them. I feel sorry for any 'aliens' that we discover that are less advanced than us cos they won't stand a chance against human nature.

David.
fx-trading-education
powers1983 wrote:

It takes someone with a very big ego to declare that we are the only intelligent species, or even that we are the most intelligent. We don't even know of all the species on our own planet, much less in our own solar system and certainly not on any others.


Yes but maybe we can think that any specy that has reached a certain level of intelligence will be lead to auto-destruction. One of the reason is that a specy that is to smart will not have predators and that may lead to destruction. (I don't mean that is is absolutely true but it is an hypothesis to consider)
Just to illustrate what I say even if it is not exactly the same case, there was an interesting experiment with rats:
if you put a number of rats in a large case with food, they will be OK and then start to reproduce. After some time the population has grown, so there is less food per animal and less space, so they start to become more agressive. At a certain point the population is too high and then the rats are starting to kill each other.
But the interesting point is that even when the population has reached again a normal level because many rats were killed they continue to kill each other, until finally nobody's left.
powers1983
fx-trading-education wrote:
powers1983 wrote:

It takes someone with a very big ego to declare that we are the only intelligent species, or even that we are the most intelligent. We don't even know of all the species on our own planet, much less in our own solar system and certainly not on any others.


Yes but maybe we can think that any specy that has reached a certain level of intelligence will be lead to auto-destruction. One of the reason is that a specy that is to smart will not have predators and that may lead to destruction. (I don't mean that is is absolutely true but it is an hypothesis to consider)
Just to illustrate what I say even if it is not exactly the same case, there was an interesting experiment with rats:
if you put a number of rats in a large case with food, they will be OK and then start to reproduce. After some time the population has grown, so there is less food per animal and less space, so they start to become more agressive. At a certain point the population is too high and then the rats are starting to kill each other.
But the interesting point is that even when the population has reached again a normal level because many rats were killed they continue to kill each other, until finally nobody's left.


Why must a certain level of intelligence lead to self-destruction? Even with your rat experiment, if the rats could travel to expand their lands and food supplies then they would have continued to thrive. True that once a species starts to self destruct they keep doing so - I would guess because if you are in a war it is very hard to stop and step back and think, ok I've done enough now, I can let them live.

I disagree that an advanced species must destroy itself. Once humans learn to colonise other planets I think that our chances of killing ourselves is decreased, not increased. It will only be when we continue to grow in numbers in an increasingly confined space that we will end up potentially fighting. Watch the flashpoints over the coming years and increasingly it will be because of scarce natural resources and not due to technological advancement.

David.
redwolves
well i believe that somthing is out there cus the universe is big and that we cant be the onliest planet with a civilised lifeform cus then we would be the onliest lifeform to get a look at the hole galaxy

and if aliens werent out there we would have a lot of meaningles films Laughing and some people are claiming to have seen them

i myself thinks i have seen a alien or a ghost in my kitchen when i hat to pie in the night

and i dont think area 51 is a alien institute or hat yuo wanna call it it hink its a thing amerika has made up to seem more interesting kindof like when they said there were nuclea bombs in irak but none was found
fx-trading-education
powers1983 wrote:
fx-trading-education wrote:
powers1983 wrote:

It takes someone with a very big ego to declare that we are the only intelligent species, or even that we are the most intelligent. We don't even know of all the species on our own planet, much less in our own solar system and certainly not on any others.


Yes but maybe we can think that any specy that has reached a certain level of intelligence will be lead to auto-destruction. One of the reason is that a specy that is to smart will not have predators and that may lead to destruction. (I don't mean that is is absolutely true but it is an hypothesis to consider)
Just to illustrate what I say even if it is not exactly the same case, there was an interesting experiment with rats:
if you put a number of rats in a large case with food, they will be OK and then start to reproduce. After some time the population has grown, so there is less food per animal and less space, so they start to become more agressive. At a certain point the population is too high and then the rats are starting to kill each other.
But the interesting point is that even when the population has reached again a normal level because many rats were killed they continue to kill each other, until finally nobody's left.


Why must a certain level of intelligence lead to self-destruction? Even with your rat experiment, if the rats could travel to expand their lands and food supplies then they would have continued to thrive. True that once a species starts to self destruct they keep doing so - I would guess because if you are in a war it is very hard to stop and step back and think, ok I've done enough now, I can let them live.

I disagree that an advanced species must destroy itself. Once humans learn to colonise other planets I think that our chances of killing ourselves is decreased, not increased. It will only be when we continue to grow in numbers in an increasingly confined space that we will end up potentially fighting. Watch the flashpoints over the coming years and increasingly it will be because of scarce natural resources and not due to technological advancement.

David.


I understand your point. Mine was an hypothesis but as I said it was not sure.
In your explanation there are also some "if" and "when".
An issue could be that usually (if there are not too many epidemic diseases) the population will grow geometrically, but I am afraid that the intelligence doesn't grow geometrically, so it may be a race: will you have enough time to find a solution before it is too late. And even if you colonise new territories it is difficult to expand at the same speed than the population grows.
Anyway we cannot answer because there is not an well know threshold where we can say: now it is too much.
Coclus
Well I think there is life somewhere in the universe besides us.. it is just unlikely that life just occurs on one planet of the billions that are out there. But I don't think they look any thing like the "aliens" our modern media dreams of.
chasbeen
I think there is no intelligent life in the Solar system except perhaps for Earth, where one or two individuals might qualify Laughing
Ennex
i believe that as the size of our universe is currently immeasurably large,
the possibility that we are the only complex life in the universe to me is totally unimaginable

even though the probability of life existing in the same form as us is infinitely small
i think that the size of the universe almost necessitates some form of life to exist somewhere
out there in the great abyss of space
jadeyfalconis
I do believe that Aliens do most likely exist.Have I seen one? No I have not but that does not mean they dont exist.There are so many other galaxies in space that I doubt we will ever know if they do exist or not.Alot of the so called "sightings" I am not sure if I believe it because there are so many people out there just paraniod or just want to make some money or even mess with people.So unless I see it with my own eyes or is geniuine evidence Ill keep my opinion at Maybe.

you can only imagine that other intelligent life think about the same thing that we are at this very moment Smile Laughing
trousersalive
Statistically speaking, the chance of there being some form of alien life in the universe is 100%. There are predicted to be billions of 'goldilocks zone' planets (not too hot, not too cold). and given that there has been billions of years for life to evolve on any of them, it is highly unlikely that some form of life hasnt come about.
However, the chances of highly evolved intelligent life... the jury is out on that one.
PIbrothers
Well, I really doubt that we're the only ones out there, so yes I do believe in Aliens.
Miriah
Studio Madcrow wrote:
Of course aliens exist. I have no idea what they look like or where they are, but it's almost inconceivable that we're the only one's out there.


I have proof that life exists at least somewhere in Outer Space. We are here aren't we?
chasbeen
Some people say we have aliens among us but they must be very good at covering their tracks. I don't know if there is intelligent life in the Solar System although the search continues on Earth but so far theres been no sign Embarassed
mrimp
I think there may be creatures like humans or other stuff like on Earth. No demon killers that fly in ships (unless their technology is that enhanced...)
alem
may be there are...who knows...but i think space is too big for humans...
Ducksteina
Sure there are aliens. Not these "E.T" Aliens but maybe simple bacteria.
The Universe is soooooooooooooooooo big, so i don't believe, that we're the only living creatures.
But i dont think these aliens have ships with warengine(star trek) or hyperdrive (stargate).
Thats simply Sci-Fi and nothing more or less.
EanofAthenasPrime
fx-trading-education wrote:
powers1983 wrote:

It takes someone with a very big ego to declare that we are the only intelligent species, or even that we are the most intelligent. We don't even know of all the species on our own planet, much less in our own solar system and certainly not on any others.


Yes but maybe we can think that any specy that has reached a certain level of intelligence will be lead to auto-destruction. One of the reason is that a specy that is to smart will not have predators and that may lead to destruction. (I don't mean that is is absolutely true but it is an hypothesis to consider)
Just to illustrate what I say even if it is not exactly the same case, there was an interesting experiment with rats:
if you put a number of rats in a large case with food, they will be OK and then start to reproduce. After some time the population has grown, so there is less food per animal and less space, so they start to become more agressive. At a certain point the population is too high and then the rats are starting to kill each other.
But the interesting point is that even when the population has reached again a normal level because many rats were killed they continue to kill each other, until finally nobody's left.


the revenge motif
lukeg74
The law of averages says that there are probably alien intelligences out there somewhere. However, the size of the universe and the problems with spanning the distances also says that it's unlikely that we'll ever encounter them in the lifetime of our species. Unfortunate.
creezalird
aliens?only some people saw them really..maybe..so i don´t believe in aliens..
Ankhanu
I believe in extraterrestrials, surely... it's both arrogant to think, and statistically improbable, that Earth is the only planet with life in the universe. That's not to say that I believe aliens have visited Earth... those are different concepts Razz
werste4
I could really imagine of some creatures in the universe. But I mean simple life forms, like bacterias. The higher the lifeform the less the chance they exist, I think.

But if there are intelligent "aliens" with hight tech and maybe spaceships, scientifically it doesn't look like that they ever visit us. The distances are just too far. But shure we could send messages. It would take long for every answer and every message has to be translated.

So let me give all of you, who really believe in aliens, an advice: don't wait for that day "they" are landing. They are not coming.
Vladalf
The universe is so big that it scares me if we would be the only ones in it.
I believe in extraterestrial life, there must be a habitable planet somewhere with alien beeings.
liljp617
I'm not going to declare they exist and I don't really believe in anything until there's good evidence, but I believe it's possible. The burden of proof, however, lies in the hands of those who declare they exist, because until it is shown, it cannot be stated other life exists. I think there's a chance other life exists...the universe is incredibly huge based on our understanding. The question is, is that life very similar to life on this planet? There are so many basic founding principles of life on Earth that it leads me to believe there's not many places that can support the life we know. That's not to say they can't exist though Razz

So, no, I don't believe they exist at the moment, but I don't think it's impossible for other life to exist Very Happy I'll wait for proof then make my final judgment.
russel26
im not believe in aliens.... i believe if there come and i see my to eyes
roboguyspacedude
There has to be something else in the universe besides us. Yes, maybe our solar system was one out of a infinite possibilities that formed our universe, but considering how big our universe is, there is bound to be someplace else in it somewhere where life also exists, whether it be humanoid or not.
liljp617
roboguyspacedude wrote:
There has to be something else in the universe besides us. Yes, maybe our solar system was one out of a infinite possibilities that formed our universe, but considering how big our universe is, there is bound to be someplace else in it somewhere where life also exists, whether it be humanoid or not.

You can't really make a declaration like that -.-
biljap
I believe that somewhere could exist some sort of life but I don’t believe when I hear some people say on TV or in newspaper that they sow aliens… I won’t believe in it until I see it with my own eyes. And even then I would first think it’s something else and try to find another explanation. I don’t believe they come to Earth.
HollyK
I haven't seen enough evidence to convince me that they are here now, but it is extremely unlikely for Earth to be the only planet in the entire universe with life. The US government has been known to test their most classified aircraft at Groom Lake (Area 51), such as the U-2, SR-71, and F-117. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a new plane that is classified. However, it would be hard to "sneak in". Even the SR-71 and B-2 can be seen on radar under certain circumstances, and in one incident a British vessel detected F-117's ~150-200 miles away while they were bombing Baghdad (Though the act of opening the bomb bay doors would expose a large amount of material to radars).
Conclusion: They likely exist, but likely not here and now, and likely not as we think they will.
liljp617
powers1983 wrote:
Anybody who thinks that Earth is the only planet in the universe to have developed intelligent life is deluding themselves. No matter how pessimistic you may be you must be able to see that the shear size of the universe means that the chances of there being only 1 planet to support life is extremely small.

It's a bit like the Loch Ness monster - some people are adamant it exists, some scoff at the very thought. But nobody knows for sure. And it is unlikely that we will ever be really sure. Unless it is found it will never be disproved to everyones satisfaction - even draining the Loch will just result in people saying it must have escaped through the tunnels into the sea.
The same is true with aliens - it is relatively easy to prove (if contact is made for example) but it will never be disproved. Never ever.

It takes someone with a very big ego to declare that we are the only intelligent species, or even that we are the most intelligent. We don't even know of all the species on our own planet, much less in our own solar system and certainly not on any others.

As to whether they live among us then try thinking what we would do if we had the technology to mingle with a more 'primitive' species? We'd be in straight away and try and enslave them. I feel sorry for any 'aliens' that we discover that are less advanced than us cos they won't stand a chance against human nature.

David.

It takes someone with an extremely large imagination to declare something scientifically exists without a single shrapnel of evidence.
undergroundking_tourus
my friend has seen them and photographed their shuttle... i know him very well and he doesnt lie anyway.... i insisted on him to tell about them but he refused...
liljp617
undergroundking_tourus wrote:
my friend has seen them and photographed their shuttle... i know him very well and he doesnt lie anyway.... i insisted on him to tell about them but he refused...

lmao Very Happy
djcaution
yes there's an area 51. I don't know if I believe about aliens or not honestly. I believe in ghosts & I believe in demons since I've seen somebody possessed by one with my own eyes on the last day of a bible camp I attended once. But aliens I'm not completely convinced. Area 51 is more of a military thing in my opinion.
Bikerman
roboguyspacedude wrote:
There has to be something else in the universe besides us. Yes, maybe our solar system was one out of a infinite possibilities that formed our universe, but considering how big our universe is, there is bound to be someplace else in it somewhere where life also exists, whether it be humanoid or not.


A reasonable assumption.
The problem is that most people have no idea of the scales/distances we are talking about. When we casually talk about our solar system most people have a picture in their mind of a poster or picture they have seen in a book showing the planets orbiting the sun. This is a completely false picture and gives no real idea of the distances involved.
If you draw the Earth about the size of a pea then Pluto would be about a mile away on that scale.

It's even worse than that, however, since Pluto is not, as most people seem to think, at the edge of the solar system - it's not even close.
The Voyager spacecraft took about 12 years to get to Pluto, travelling at about 30,000 miles per hour. To reach the edge of the solar system would take about another 10,000 years.
Put another way, the edge of our solar system is about 50 thousand times farther away than Pluto is.

This means that it is quite reasonable to assume that no human will ever reach the edge of our own solar system, let alone travel to another star system.

Even if we assume a very generous solution to the Drake equation and assume there are several million intelligent species in the Milky-way, the average distance between them would be a couple of hundred light years.
Coffyfacemk2
there's got to be something out there, somewhere, otherwise theres faaaaaarrr too much empty space up there. Not good from a galactic feng shui point of view.
Bryan_Bezzle
I do believe! Crazy thing is..I'm Christian! I love that movie that the guy posted in like the second reply on this topic. What if....WHAT IF...when we went to the moon we did find something out there and since then the leaders of Earth are gravitating towards a unified Earth which most of us believe is evil, i.e. new world order and such. But what if we did have contact, is it so unreasonable that our leaders communicated to the "aliens" that our society is not ready for this truth and they must prepare us to prevent total anarchy? I remember reading a conversation Neil Armstrong had with the astronaut that was orbiting the moon while he was on it and Neil said that there were ships on the moon! NASA immediately ordered him to switch to code talk. Whether or not that conversation ever actually took place there are many other things such as doctored photographs of the moon and the fact that we've never seen the dark side! Who knows if they are green, they may be flesh colored like us. But then again they may be green! I'm rambling but damn the possibilities alone are more exciting than....more exciting than....something really really exciting!!!
Bikerman
Let's separate two concepts - the existence of aliens, and the presence, and knowledge of that presence, by our political masters.
The first is, I believe, likely. The second is unlikely to the point of incredibility.
The whole controversy over the moon landings is an example of myth-making in action. We HAVE seen the darkside of the moon and it has been photographed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_side_of_the_Moon
Bryan_Bezzle
Bikerman wrote:
Let's separate two concepts - the existence of aliens, and the presence, and knowledge of that presence, by our political masters.
The first is, I believe, likely. The second is unlikely to the point of incredibility.
The whole controversy over the moon landings is an example of myth-making in action. We HAVE seen the darkside of the moon and it has been photographed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Far_side_of_the_Moon


Thanks for clearing that up. I just get excited about the possibilities as you can probably tell.
Bikerman
OK...here's some reading you might enjoy
http://bikerman.info/resources/mywork/universe-guide/universe-guide.htm
Cddhesh
I myself have never seen aliens or any strange things in sky.But i believe that they are their in universe.Imagine, there are many solar systems and they will have planet like earth ,having life.
They may be advance in technology or backwords too.So imagine,It may be that aliens are staying with us in our vicinity changing their bodies.May be possible if they are far ahead in technology then us.
Coen
Hmm. That's a pretty good question.
Do I believe in Aliens? Yes, I do.
Do I believe in Aliens like people tell me they are? No I don't.

I do not believe that Earth is the only planet in this massive universe with life on it. There must be other planets with simular conditions where life has come. I do believe, however, that those creatures, just like ourselves, are unable to leave their solarsystem and are unable to contact us. I do not believe in Area 51 or stuff like that. Think about it, the US managed to keep secret that they're torchering suspected terrorists, they have never actually confirmed it, but yet they manage to spill information regarding something as top secret as Aliens? Second point of critique is that there is no reason to keep it a secret. Why would you?
SonLight
Coen wrote:
Think about it, the US managed to keep secret that they're torchering suspected terrorists, they have never actually confirmed it, but yet they manage to spill information regarding something as top secret as Aliens? Second point of critique is that there is no reason to keep it a secret. Why would you?

First point: Assuming they wanted to keep information about aliens a secret, they couldn't entirely hide it. If we assume some of the things people have seen in the sky (or on the ground, as in Roswell) are really aliens, some information leaked to the media before the government could cover it up.

Second point: If there were aliens, there would be plenty of reasons for governments to get nervous about public knowledge. They may want to study the technology. Panic may ensue, especially if the public has reason to believe the aliens are hostile.

I am not suggesting there are aliens. I am just saying that the confusion that exists about the matter is similar to what you might expect if there were aliens. More likely, the government has been secretive to protect new military technologies, and perhaps because they thought they should understand some phenomena before they tried to explain it to the public.
Coen
SonLight wrote:
First point: Assuming they wanted to keep information about aliens a secret, they couldn't entirely hide it. If we assume some of the things people have seen in the sky (or on the ground, as in Roswell) are really aliens, some information leaked to the media before the government could cover it up.

Can't they? If we presume there are really aliens then the US goverment is doing a hell of a job keeping it secret. Only people supporting conspiracy theories have enourmous amounts of information of which I say the US could never have spilled it as they don't with information regarding possible turtore either. Only thing that's circeling are rumours, and those are no prove at all.

SonLight wrote:
Second point: If there were aliens, there would be plenty of reasons for governments to get nervous about public knowledge. They may want to study the technology. Panic may ensue, especially if the public has reason to believe the aliens are hostile.

If the aliens would have been hostile they would have attackted us and it would have been over with. We would have noticed then. If creatures with the technology to come here want to harm us then we cannot stop them with our technology and so we would have known if there were hostile aliens around. Studying technology can also happen whilst the public knows there are aliens. It's not like the public will stop the goverment from investigating and learning more about the technology.
Bryan_Bezzle
I would say USOs are far more intriguing than UFOs. Most UFO reports are made by people looking up at the sky and noticing something that does not look like the average airplane. Most USO reports are made by Navy officials who spot something several thousand feet below where their technology is capable of going. In the case of a USO, it may not be aliens at all. Just something we haven't found out about yet.
Bikerman
Bryan_Bezzle wrote:
I would say USOs are far more intriguing than UFOs. Most UFO reports are made by people looking up at the sky and noticing something that does not look like the average airplane. Most USO reports are made by Navy officials who spot something several thousand feet below where their technology is capable of going. In the case of a USO, it may not be aliens at all. Just something we haven't found out about yet.

It would be useful to define the acronym. USO, I believe, in this context refers to Unidentified Submerged Object?
Bryan_Bezzle
Bikerman wrote:
Bryan_Bezzle wrote:
I would say USOs are far more intriguing than UFOs. Most UFO reports are made by people looking up at the sky and noticing something that does not look like the average airplane. Most USO reports are made by Navy officials who spot something several thousand feet below where their technology is capable of going. In the case of a USO, it may not be aliens at all. Just something we haven't found out about yet.

It would be useful to define the acronym. USO, I believe, in this context refers to Unidentified Submerged Object?


Correct, my apologies.
agustin
yeah.. for sure. if theres live here why not out there? its true that is kinda mystery but thats the good thing and what it keeps our live progressing.
Teezgaff
This as always been a contentious subject which I have tried to study.

I would like to say I have never seen a disc or triangle craft but know people who have. Is everbody who see's something otherworldly a nutter / deluded / schizo or whatever? I don't believe so.

Who would be the best observer to give an opinion? Air traffic controllers, Military observers, Physisists, Pilots, Astronauts? All of these professions are on record for reporting unusual craft.

There are a few things to consider.

Most people think it is impossible for an alien race to be here because of the vast distances involved, but if we don't know of their technology who are we to say. Hundreds of years ago you would have been called a heretic if you said the earth was round. Imagine if you could demonstrate a mobile phone or TV to somebody in victorian times would you evade being lynched?

The thing is: People (especially governments) like to have secrets as it gives them power/control over the people who don't know. Why do you think the powers of old destroyed books and supressed education ? Because an ignorant / un-educated society is easier to control.

I have to say one of the best documented cases for UFO's has to be Eduard Meier (Switzerland).
With thousands of images, multiple cine film and also sound recordings.

This man has been vilified from day 1. But to this day no-one has been able to duplicate ANY of his images or cine-film. This man has 1 arm by the way. I think there is still a million pound bounty for anyone to duplicate the evidence he has, using the same equipment. (35mm SLR and 8mm Cine camera).

Hey don't get me wrong many people have faked photo's etc but to have thousands ??

Also why won't NASA broadcast live streams anymore? Is this because of the STS missions that have recorded anomalous objects (STS-46,48 and 75 just to name a few).

An interesting rumour on the net at the moment are the Isaac documents.

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/

I think this may be more Bikerman's territory than mine but it does sound intrigueing.
(By the way I think the majority of the drone craft are CGI.)

France has released all of their ufo documents (I would recommend firefox with translator+ plugin if you don't read french) and the UK is to follow later this year.

Well that's it for now... This subject will never die and if in the future ET does come forward and say hello, the people who deny it now will most probably say they knew all along.
Bikerman
Teezgaff wrote:
This as always been a contentious subject which I have tried to study.

I would like to say I have never seen a disc or triangle craft but know people who have. Is everbody who see's something otherworldly a nutter / deluded / schizo or whatever? I don't believe so.
Neither do I. Many people have reported sightings in good faith. The question is often not whether they saw something but what that 'something' was.
Quote:
Who would be the best observer to give an opinion? Air traffic controllers, Military observers, Physisists, Pilots, Astronauts? All of these professions are on record for reporting unusual craft.
Yes that is certainly the case. The best sources, I think, would be astronomers since they are used to looking into the night sky and are familiar with various possible natural causes of UFOs - satellites, comets etc.
Quote:
Most people think it is impossible for an alien race to be here because of the vast distances involved, but if we don't know of their technology who are we to say. Hundreds of years ago you would have been called a heretic if you said the earth was round. Imagine if you could demonstrate a mobile phone or TV to somebody in victorian times would you evade being lynched?
Well not really. The idea that the world was flat was known to be false from the time of ancient Greece. Astonomers, sailors and navigators were well aware of the 'spherical' earth. You wouldn't have been able to demonstrate a mobile phone or TV since there would have been no transmitter or base-stations Smile The question of distance is important because it is not thought to be a technology limitation, it is thought to be a fundamental laws of physics limitation. I cannot currently conceive of any technology which would allow you to break the light barrier. That does not mean, of course, that it will never be possible.
Quote:
The thing is: People (especially governments) like to have secrets as it gives them power/control over the people who don't know. Why do you think the powers of old destroyed books and supressed education ? Because an ignorant / un-educated society is easier to control.
Which powers of old are these?
Quote:
I have to say one of the best documented cases for UFO's has to be Eduard Meier (Switzerland).
With thousands of images, multiple cine film and also sound recordings.

This man has been vilified from day 1. But to this day no-one has been able to duplicate ANY of his images or cine-film. This man has 1 arm by the way. I think there is still a million pound bounty for anyone to duplicate the evidence he has, using the same equipment. (35mm SLR and 8mm Cine camera).
Well he has been 'vilified' by many - I agree. That includes his ex-wife who claims she saw him making models which he photographed. I haven't seen the 'bounty' offer - if you have details I would be interested since I could do with a million.
Quote:
Hey don't get me wrong many people have faked photo's etc but to have thousands ??
Why are 1000 fakes more convincing that 1?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Meier
Quote:
Also why won't NASA broadcast live streams anymore? Is this because of the STS missions that have recorded anomalous objects (STS-46,48 and 75 just to name a few).

They do. In fact they are planning a high-quality streaming media feed as we speak.
http://www.streamingmedia.com/article.asp?id=9331
Quote:
An interesting rumour on the net at the moment are the Isaac documents.

http://isaaccaret.fortunecity.com/

I think this may be more Bikerman's territory than mine but it does sound intrigueing.
(By the way I think the majority of the drone craft are CGI.)
I find the pictures very unconvincing. I suspect you are right and they are CGI.
Teezgaff
Quote:
Yes that is certainly the case. The best sources, I think, would be astronomers since they are used to looking into the night sky and are familiar with various possible natural causes of UFOs - satellites, comets etc.

Wasn't Hynek an astronomer? He changed his view to a believer after scrutinising the USAF reports.

Quote:
Which powers of old are these?

Spanish inquisitions come to mind....

Quote:
Well he has been 'vilified' by many - I agree. That includes his ex-wife who claims she saw him making models which he photographed. I haven't seen the 'bounty' offer - if you have details I would be interested since I could do with a million.

She actually retracted that statement as it was coaxed through a newspaper article after a messy divorce. The offer was offered in the book Light Years. I also think bruce macabee had something to do with it.

Quote:
Why are 1000 fakes more convincing that 1?

As you and I know well it's hard enough to do 1 convincing image. To have 1000's with original negs is quite another task.

Quote:
They do. In fact they are planning a high-quality streaming media feed as we speak.

This will also be time delayed as NASA TV is...

Quote:
I find the pictures very unconvincing. I suspect you are right and they are CGI.

What do you think of the pdf docs? Do you think this kind of programming is feasible?
Bikerman
Teezgaff wrote:
Quote:
Yes that is certainly the case. The best sources, I think, would be astronomers since they are used to looking into the night sky and are familiar with various possible natural causes of UFOs - satellites, comets etc.

Wasn't Hynek an astronomer? He changed his view to a believer after scrutinising the USAF reports.
Yes indeed. He didn't, however, believe that UFOs are alien spaceships. He did believe in the phenomenon of UFOs (so do I - so do most people). The emphasis is, however, on 'unidentified'.
As Hynek himself said in his later years (1976):
Hynek wrote:
"I have come to support less and less the idea that UFOs are 'nuts and bolts' spacecrafts from other worlds. There are just too many things going against this theory. To me, it seems ridiculous that super intelligences would travel great distances to do relatively stupid things like stop cars, collect soil samples, and frighten people. I think we must begin to re-examine the evidence. We must begin to look closer to home."
Quote:

Quote:
Which powers of old are these?

Spanish inquisitions come to mind....
Hmm but that is more to do with religious suppression that state suppression isn't it?
Quote:
Quote:
Well he has been 'vilified' by many - I agree. That includes his ex-wife who claims she saw him making models which he photographed. I haven't seen the 'bounty' offer - if you have details I would be interested since I could do with a million.

She actually retracted that statement as it was coaxed through a newspaper article after a messy divorce. The offer was offered in the book Light Years. I also think bruce macabee had something to do with it.
Not sure about that - I have no documents on that matter. I do know that Meier makes many incredible claims - he claims to be in regular contact with an alien culture called the "Plejaren" for example - and he is not someone who I regard as a credible witness (to put it mildly).
PS - I don't think this is an ad-hominem attack on the man, since it is directly related to his photographic 'evidence'.
Quote:
Quote:
Why are 1000 fakes more convincing that 1?

As you and I know well it's hard enough to do 1 convincing image. To have 1000's with original negs is quite another task.
Well, presuming he has perfected a technique of producing these images it is not difficult to imagine him using it many times.
Quote:
Quote:
They do. In fact they are planning a high-quality streaming media feed as we speak.

This will also be time delayed as NASA TV is...
Have you a source for this? I don't find it odd that they would introduce a small delay - many broadcasters do this so they can filter out swearing and obscenity. If you are saying they are filtering out other stuff then I'd like to see some evidence.
Quote:
Quote:
I find the pictures very unconvincing. I suspect you are right and they are CGI.
What do you think of the pdf docs? Do you think this kind of programming is feasible?
Haven't yet seen them...I'll have a look if I get time later.
Bryan_Bezzle
In 1972, Dr. Hermann Oberth, a NASA space scientist and one of the three founding fathers of rocketry and modern astronautics and Von Braun's mentor said 'Today, we cannot produce machines that fly the same as UFOs do. They are flying by means of artificial fields of Gravity. This would explain the sudden changes of directions. This hypothesis would also explain the pilling-up of these discs into a Cylindrical or cigar shaped Mothership upon leaving the Earth. Because it is in this fashion, that only one field of gravity would be required for all the flying saucers. We cannot take credit for our record advancement in certain scientific fields alone. We have been helped... and we have been helped by the people of other WORLDS.'
Bikerman
Yes, he was a well known supporter of the Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis.
http://www.mufon.com/znews_oberth.html

Needless to say, I think he was completely wrong, but that does not mean he was not a good scientist - his work in Rocketry has rightly been recognised and honoured.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Oberth
Bryan_Bezzle
Bikerman wrote:
Yes, he was a well known supporter of the Extra-Terrestrial Hypothesis.
http://www.mufon.com/znews_oberth.html

Needless to say, I think he was completely wrong, but that does not mean he was not a good scientist - his work in Rocketry has rightly been recognised and honoured.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermann_Oberth



Well he knows more about it than I do. If that is his hypothesis, I'll take it for what it is because I dont plan on becoming a rocket scientist to prove him wrong.
Teezgaff
Quote:
Have you a source for this? I don't find it odd that they would introduce a small delay - many broadcasters do this so they can filter out swearing and obscenity. If you are saying they are filtering out other stuff then I'd like to see some evidence.


Quote:
It has been some years since NASA broadcast live images into people's front rooms via satellite or cable boxes. Now you can still watch live events, but only in low bandwidth, web streamed video. If you try and log on during a launch or satellite deployment, NASA's bandwidth gets gobbled up by millions of viewers across the web all trying to log on at once. There is also a very convenient delay produced by the technology used. What you see could be upto 2 minutes behind real time due to the signal being processed by many different servers across the world, ample time for NASA to flick the switch if anything unusual should happen. What I was recording was directly off the back of the shuttle and the delays involved were less than a second

Martyn Stubbs (Used to work for a canadian tv company)

He sought permission from his company to record direct NASA TV feeds after becoming aware of the STS-80 events in the early 90's.
Bikerman
Teezgaff wrote:
Quote:
Have you a source for this? I don't find it odd that they would introduce a small delay - many broadcasters do this so they can filter out swearing and obscenity. If you are saying they are filtering out other stuff then I'd like to see some evidence.


Quote:
It has been some years since NASA broadcast live images into people's front rooms via satellite or cable boxes. Now you can still watch live events, but only in low bandwidth, web streamed video. If you try and log on during a launch or satellite deployment, NASA's bandwidth gets gobbled up by millions of viewers across the web all trying to log on at once. There is also a very convenient delay produced by the technology used. What you see could be upto 2 minutes behind real time due to the signal being processed by many different servers across the world, ample time for NASA to flick the switch if anything unusual should happen. What I was recording was directly off the back of the shuttle and the delays involved were less than a second

Martyn Stubbs (Used to work for a canadian tv company)

He sought permission from his company to record direct NASA TV feeds after becoming aware of the STS-80 events in the early 90's.

Hmm...something odd here surely. If he is saying the 2 min delay is a server propogation delay then NASA could not pull any 'switch' because the 'stream' would already be in transit, or am I missing something? He seems to be saying that you can watch a live stream but that at times of peak demand there is a delay - that is normal surely..
Teezgaff
I presume he means they can intervene due to the stream at NASA being live which is then being piped onto the net via their streams. (no direct Cable or Sat feed anymore)
Bikerman
Teezgaff wrote:
I presume he means they can intervene due to the stream at NASA being live which is then being piped onto the net via their streams. (no direct Cable or Sat feed anymore)
Ahh...OK. That would make sense. It still would seem to imply that there is a big 'OFF' switch somewhere at the back-end of the NASA internal networks and before the external internet pipeline. From my own experience of managing networks I have to say that it doesn't normally work like that (unless specifically designed to). I would have expected NASA to use open architecture on the non-critical systems and probably link elements of their systems via the internet itself (leased IT circuits are horribly expensive - I know! (I used to be jointly responsible for Cornings internal network links into Europe and the US from Deeside).
adeydas
Lifeforms can only exist on planets which have temperate conditions like Earth or Mars. Add that with availibility of water and we have advanced (and probably intelligent) forms of life like humans. If there were aliens on some planet like the Earth in some other star system... they would probably be carbon based and very much like us.

That's my understanding of the topic... what do you think?!?
Teezgaff
Quote:
Ahh...OK. That would make sense. It still would seem to imply that there is a big 'OFF' switch somewhere at the back-end of the NASA internal networks and before the external internet pipeline.


If you had something to hide and the funding wouldn't you?
Bikerman
Teezgaff wrote:
Quote:
Ahh...OK. That would make sense. It still would seem to imply that there is a big 'OFF' switch somewhere at the back-end of the NASA internal networks and before the external internet pipeline.


If you had something to hide and the funding wouldn't you?

Well, maybe. The problem is, however, that we are assuming they have something to hide. I have seen evidence, for example, from the Apollo 11 mission of the astronauts sighting of a 'UFO'. The thing is, I have seen it, as has anyone else who wanted to look. Where did I find the info? From NASA.
NASA, like any other large organisation, is capable of cockups and mis-management. There is a powerful argument that both of these were responsible for the 2 shuttle losses. I examined in some detail the findings of the commission into the Challenger disaster for example (mainly because Feynman was on the commission and he is a 'hero' of mine). The conclusions (IHMO) were clear - mis-management on an institutional scale, coupled with dishonesty in reporting and evaluation of risks.
That is a long way, however, from a cover-up on the scale which is proposed here. The assertion that NASA has (regularly?) witnessed ET activity and has, at the highest levels, covered this up, just seems incredible to me. The scale of the cover-up necessary would be something unheard of in history. Add to that the fact that we are working with scientists (who are normally not easy to 'boss around' - like herding cats) and factor in the potential rewards for anyone breaking the story (it would certainly be the biggest story in history with financial implications that boggle the mind).
Non of these are arguments for why it cannot happen, of course. I just don't believe, on the balance of probabilities, that it has happened.

The funding issue is another matter - I would argue that NASA is fighting for the limited funding it already has. Surely any evidence of ET would be a powerful argument for increasing that funding.
Teezgaff
Quote:
The funding issue is another matter - I would argue that NASA is fighting for the limited funding it already has. Surely any evidence of ET would be a powerful argument for increasing that funding.


The word here in NASA's case is FUNDING.

Without the funding from the military complex there would be no NASA. The same with all the scientists today. I agree scientists just want to get on with their jobs and make discoveries to benefit humanity. I'm sure oppenheimer just wanted to create free energy but look what happened there.

The thing is, without military budgets (black or otherwise) half the discoveries made wouldn't have happened. The official secrets acts gags everybody. If you speak out they discredit you, if that doesn't work they threaten you, if that doesn't work they loose you.

If NASA want to keep in the space game they have to play along. Why do they bother with 70's technology with the space shuttle? Because if they can blame the technology they can hide mass amounts of cash in black budgets. Just look at the amount of UFO reports, do you really think they are american/russian technology? If so why haven't we replaced the shuttle with something more efficient. Reports of craft travelling Mach 10+, 20G turns etc.

What was the code for anomolous objects on the Apollo missions? "Santa Claus" oh and then they switched to an encrypted channel. Nothing to hide? I was watching NASA TV a couple of years ago when there was a female astronaut onboard. There she was talking away describing the view, then she says she see's something they tell her to switch the radio channel. Next minute the TV is just showing her doing some mundane experiment (no sound).The point is they do as they are told, that's not "cover-up" it's "plausible denial". I was in the army thats what your trained to do. It's drilled into you daily to take orders without question and do what is right for the country and your comrades.

Why don't scientists look into the UFO subject? Because they'll lose credibility and lose their various grants. If tomorrow you offered £50 million in grants to look into the subject, you'd have 100's of credible people in the community jumping on board and the sniggering would stop.

The best example has to be the X project. $10million dollars to someone who could build a re-usable spacecraft. Within 5 years somebody did, and now space tourism is in the realm of reality (VirginGalactic). Now whats gonna happen when one of the passengers comes home with HD video footage of objects in space? Will the military allow the risk? Will one of Bransons flights be fatal? Give it 5 years and we'll find out.
Bikerman
Well, let's take that one at a time.
Firstly funding. I agree that NASA is part of the military-industrial complex of the US. I also agree that the military funding includes a lot of 'black ops' stuff that we don't hear about. In fact I think this is probably THE major reason for most UFO sightings.
The funding for NASA has been in decline for some time. If you are saying that they are secretly getting billions as a reward for keeping quiet about ETs then two questions arise;
a) Where are the billions? A lot of knowledgable people go over the federal budget in some detail, and although there are certainly 'black holes' of military black-ops spending, there seems to be little evidence that NASA gets much of it.
b) What are they spending the money on? The budgets of NASA are published. They constantly plead for more funding to cover projects such as the Mars mission. If they secretly have a cache of billions of dollars then why are they crying for more?
http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf02315/
The reason they are stuck with the 70s technology of the space-shuttle is because they have insufficient funding to develop the next generation. If senior NASA officials really had evidence of ET then I find it hard to believe they would have problems getting the money required for the development of a new generation of spacecraft.

Secondly, secrets. The official secrets act does indeed 'gag' you, but that has not stopped people speaking out. There are many cases where people have broken the act in order to speak out against something they believe is wrong. There are many examples of 'whistleblowers' in recent history - a quick 'google' reveals any number of such cases. Do you think it's credible that tens of thousands of scientists would agree to be bound by secrecy on a matter of such world-shattering importance as the existence of ET? Personally, my experience with the scientists I know makes that an incredible proposition.

Thirdly - scientists and UFOs. Many scientists have looked into the phenomenon. I'm sure you have reports from some of them. A quick search of the internet reveals many;
http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1744.htm
I agree that, if you were to offer a large grant, there would be scientists queuing up to apply for it - such is the nature of science funding. Both the US and UK governments have funded such studies in the past. The most recent UK study I know is the 2000 MOD study
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4981720.stm
The problem is that conspiracy theorists will never be satisfied. They will inevitably point out supposed flaws in such studies or claim that findings have been suppressed or witnesses intimidated or evidence ignored. You cannot win in this scenario since no study you could possibly conceive of will lay the matter to rest and no government is going to sign an open-ended cheque.

Finally - the X project. Surely this is evidence against the conspiracy. Would governments spend (presumably) billions on covering-up ETs, and then sit-back and happily allow private companies to develop space-craft capable of observing them? As far as I know there has been no government interference with either the competition itself or the competitors entering the competition. Does that sound likely if we are to imagine a huge government consipiracy to hide evidence of ET?
Teezgaff
Quote:
"In the counsels of Government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the Military Industrial Complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together."

President Eisenhower 1961.

Many people have come forward, and many people have been discredited. Just look at the disclosure project. How many have come forward, around 400?

Jesse Marcel (Roswell). An highly trained individual. Part of the 509 bomber command (the only squadron with atomic weapons in the 40's). Misidentifies a weather balloon for an alien space craft.. doh. The US has claimed 3 different reasons for this 1)Weather balloon 2)Mogul (which was a weather balloon with different kit on it) 3)High altitude dummy tests (which they didn't do til the early 50's). This man saw weather balloons weekly do you really think he would have misidentified one? If he was so stupid why didn't they demote him? Why transport a mundane balloon under armed guard?

How many UK policemen/women have come forward with tales of anomolous craft? Just search for PRUFOS.

What does the news media have to do with the subject of UFO's. Usually it's just a AND FINALLY news story.

Charles Halt Deputy base commander RAF Bentwaters christmas 1980 do you really think he misidentified a lighthouse. All you have to do is listen to his recording of the event. It certainly wasn't a stationary llight 30 miles away he was observing.

There are many many more witnesses and evidence of amazing craft in our airspace.

The giant triangle craft over belguim. Photographed, chased by tornado's and tracked on radar.

I honestly don't know why people are so sceptical of the ET subject. I do know I see more evidence for extraterrestrials than Jesus being a real person.

As Einstein said "Reality is an illusion, albeit a persistant one."

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C Clarke.
Do you believe in magic?...
Carina
Not a way .
We're aliens too !
Hoo yay !

"Aliens" in movies looks kinda weird , perhaps they should make them look like proper animals =_=
intruder_indeed
I am very much a realist and believe in what I see with my own 2 eyes. And have never seen an alien or a flying saucer for that matter so therefore I do not believe in them. It's a bit like saying do you believe in fairies. However I am quite partial to Sci-Fi films in which peeps imaginations run wild in creating such material. But that is not to say there is other life forms on other planets somewhere. But the chances of them getting here on earth are astrinomical. I certainly do not take any notice of these so called documentries with doctored photographs, and refuse to watch such garbage.
Bikerman
I have actually seen a UFO (at least it was 'U' for about 20 mins). Driving across Australia a few years ago I saw a bright object in the distance (it was starting to go dark - twilight). The object seemed to stop, pause, and then shoot directly upwards with a huge 'flame tail' behind it.
It eventually disappeared into the night sky, obscured by high cloud.
It was about 20 minutes later that we drove past a huge field where the 'Melbourne Air Show' was being held. We stopped for a look and I got chatting to a guy who explained what we had seen. Apparently it's known as a 'dump and burn'. A Russian MiG jet had pointed vertically, turned on the after-burners and dumped the fuel in a spectacular manouvre.
I'm used to watching the skies (I used to be a bit of an amateur astronomer) but I must admit that I was baffled at the time - I had never previously seen this manouvre and it looked like nothing I could identify.
newolder
11th November-ish, last year

http://revver.com/video/478649/defense-department-rocket-fuel-dump-during-the-taurid-meteor-shower/

Well, it could have been an angel of some description: better that it wasn't. ed.
Bikerman
Nice footage Smile
Teezgaff
Being based at Cosford for a while we used to see some amazing sights in the sky, especially at the airshows there. The lads who were testing new aircraft were great too.
maxkezee
i know that there is a life on the other planet. just like roswell accident that is the fact alien is a real
liljp617
adeydas wrote:
Lifeforms can only exist on planets which have temperate conditions like Earth or Mars. Add that with availibility of water and we have advanced (and probably intelligent) forms of life like humans. If there were aliens on some planet like the Earth in some other star system... they would probably be carbon based and very much like us.

That's my understanding of the topic... what do you think?!?

I don't know if you could say that Razz They could have different adaptations to the environment surrounding them. For instance, plants here take in CO2 and H2O for the production of glucose/nourishment. Perhaps plants on other planets have adaptations to acquire nourishment through methane or other gases. Of course, it's all just random hypotheses and I'm sure I have fallacies in my thinking, but I don't necessarily believe a life form on another planet would have to have very similar aspects to those on Earth. If evolution holds truth on other planets, I can only assume other life forms in a completely different environment would have drastic differences in adaptation.

maxkezee wrote:
i know that there is a life on the other planet. just like roswell accident that is the fact alien is a real

Perhaps you can put forth some evidence of this "fact" you speak of? Until then, it's nothing but a conspiracy theory Smile And we all know how good those fun things are!
Teezgaff
Quote:
Well, let's take that one at a time.
Firstly funding. I agree that NASA is part of the military-industrial complex of the US. I also agree that the military funding includes a lot of 'black ops' stuff that we don't hear about. In fact I think this is probably THE major reason for most UFO sightings.
The funding for NASA has been in decline for some time. If you are saying that they are secretly getting billions as a reward for keeping quiet about ETs then two questions arise;
a) Where are the billions? A lot of knowledgable people go over the federal budget in some detail, and although there are certainly 'black holes' of military black-ops spending, there seems to be little evidence that NASA gets much of it.
b) What are they spending the money on? The budgets of NASA are published. They constantly plead for more funding to cover projects such as the Mars mission. If they secretly have a cache of billions of dollars then why are they crying for more?


From the original NASA Charter.. Sec.305.. (i)
Quote:
The [National Aeronautics and Space] Administration shall be considered a defence agency of the United States for the purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the United States code..


Sec.205.. (d)
Quote:
NO [NASA] information which has been classified for reasons of national security shall be included in ANY report made under the section [of the act]..


So if NASA finds anything that the US deem to be of National Security they cannot publish those findings.
Bikerman
I accept that (I explicitly said that NASA is part of the military complex) - that was not my point.
The point I was making is about funding. NASA is underfunded in the opinion of many who are interested in Space. The budgets for NASA are published and analysed every year.
If we are to believe that NASA is hiding secrets about ET then it seems strange that NASA's budget has not risen significantly over the last decade. If I were heading up NASA and I had evidence that there were 'little green men' out there, then I can guarantee that I would secure a large increase in funding from whatever administration happened to be in power - it would be a no-brainer.
As it happens NASA is stuck with outdated technology which is poorly designed for purpose (the shuttle) and some remnants of a barking-mad scheme from a former administration for 'star wars'. If the administration has contact with, or knowledge of, alien technology I would have thought they could do much better....
SonLight
Bikerman wrote:

As it happens NASA is stuck with outdated technology which is poorly designed for purpose (the shuttle) and some remnants of a barking-mad scheme from a former administration for 'star wars'. If the administration has contact with, or knowledge of, alien technology I would have thought they could do much better....


What better way to hide research into alien technologies, knowing there would be a lot of failures at the beginning, than with a "barking-mad scheme" to divert attention. I do give that former administration credit for diverting attention from the race to see whose economy would collapse first. We clearly came out the winner, but the process was sure scary.

If there HAD been alien technologies to study (which I doubt), quite similar behavior might have been appropriate. Putting added funding into less visible organizations than NASA might make sense too. I suspect that would depend a lot on the political connections of people in the various agencies. Again, remember they would have had to provide funding for a lot of failures without causing a stampede to shut down the "wasteful" spending.
Bikerman
SonLight wrote:
Bikerman wrote:

As it happens NASA is stuck with outdated technology which is poorly designed for purpose (the shuttle) and some remnants of a barking-mad scheme from a former administration for 'star wars'. If the administration has contact with, or knowledge of, alien technology I would have thought they could do much better....


What better way to hide research into alien technologies, knowing there would be a lot of failures at the beginning, than with a "barking-mad scheme" to divert attention. I do give that former administration credit for diverting attention from the race to see whose economy would collapse first. We clearly came out the winner, but the process was sure scary.
But we know about much of the developments that arose from SDI.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative
Quote:
If there HAD been alien technologies to study (which I doubt), quite similar behavior might have been appropriate. Putting added funding into less visible organizations than NASA might make sense too. I suspect that would depend a lot on the political connections of people in the various agencies. Again, remember they would have had to provide funding for a lot of failures without causing a stampede to shut down the "wasteful" spending.
OK..I can see some logic here, but I still can't see an overall picture. What you are proposing is that the NASA people who became aware of the contact would then be sidelined by another arm or arms of the defence industry who would then take over responsibility for research/development/application in that field. Surely that would severely piss-off the NASA officials concerned? Is there any evidence for such extra arms of the military establishment being established? (Yes, I know they would, by definition, be secret, but it is difficult to hide the establishment of an organisation large enough to be dealing with this sort of thing. We are talking about billions of dollars, thousands (or tens of thousands) of employees on the ground, research facilities and so on).
Surely one of the most important technologies that would arise from alien contact would be space travel itself. Is there any other agency in the US which has a similar or comparable role to NASA in that regard?
Teezgaff
Also if they are so short of funding how do they plan to pay for the moon base in 2020? Surely there is going to be massive investment for NASA to achieve this.

Wonder where that's coming from....
Bikerman
Teezgaff wrote:
Also if they are so short of funding how do they plan to pay for the moon base in 2020? Surely there is going to be massive investment for NASA to achieve this.

Wonder where that's coming from....
Largely from scrapping the shuttle program. The shuttle program is due to be scrapped in 2010...
icecool
Jakob [JaWGames] wrote:
I believe that it probably exists other lifeforms in other parts of the universe but I don't think that they have to be carbon based.

I don't believe in aliens in the way many movies shows them. Why would a lifeform become green with pearshaped heads and huge black eyes?


whats wrong with grean pearshaped heads and huge black eyes? look at ourselves and what do we see? some pink, some brown, yellowish. black. reddish heads with bits sticking out - ears, nose, lips HAIR... all very peculiar and not really practical when you think about it.

but here is where OUR problem starts really - we look at everything from our own perspective because WE is the only thing we really know. to stretch the imagination to the point where we become non judgemental in our perception is against our own survival instinct. our whole concept of "alien" is therefore trapped in our own experience of ourselves.

but to answer the question.
yes of course there are othe beings out there.

cheers
indianinworld
I have seen myself and my friends / parents / relative have seen me and accepted that they have not seen a alien....

Probably i need to see you Very Happy . THen we can decide on Aliens exist or not.... This is not E.T. or Independence day !!!! We are in the World - Earth.

People may speak facts about Alients Rolling Eyes [video footages or appearances in the sky, etc]. But nobody knows the truth if those appearance were man-made or made by nature or some other illusions... Iam speaking about Truth with solid facts.... 5 seconds footage with one hour video programme will not work out to prove these...

As far as i believe, there is no alien...

Keep Smiling - Keep Living !!!! Smile

_________________
as alwayZz - Cheers and Cherish
indianinworld
Visit me @ : http://www.sathish.frih.net
Teezgaff
Hi all, anyone watching NASA TV? Anomolous object sighted 16.45 GMT. Confirmed by capcom asking astonaut if they saw it...

I have the audio recording.. I will upload in a bit for you to hear.... The video didn't record tho through realplayer....
Bikerman
So NASA didn't hit the 'off switch' then? Smile
Teezgaff
They did switch the camera angle 15 minutes ago when 2 lights appeared. 1 light to start with then another brighten up about an inch away( compared to looking at the screen).
Teezgaff
Audio from above:-

http://www.humyo.com/F/82197837

It's in a Realplayer format, hopefully someone can extract the video. Also if someone could edit it to the relevant portions (1.15 - 2.40 mins). then I can re-upload as is 15Meg at mo...
Bikerman
Sorry - can't handle IVR files for conversion...can convert just about anything else but not IVR
Teezgaff
I tried everything myself... Couldn't get anything to convert it or cut it down..

Nasa have just finished their briefing now, so here's what happened today.

1st sighting 16.45. Astronauts were installing the Columbus module. The camera was wide angle with astronauts central. Object drifted from top of 3rd 3rd (right) of screen down pulsing white all the way until exited the field of view (this is the recorded audio in the file)

2nd approx 17.10. Close up of module and astronauts, deep space to left-hand side of picture. Spot of light appears, bout 3 seconds later another light brightens about an inch away from first (inch on screen). Camera then changes to another view. (nothing said by capcom).

3rd approx 17.18. Object travels straight down centre of image. I caught these screen grabs..

http://www.humyo.com/82226313
Bikerman
Very indistinct on the grabs but if I had to guess I would say either satellite or space-junk..
Silk2008
miacps wrote:
Evidence of alien lifeforms may be in the bible, if the bible holds any credibility or accuracy that is. Back in that time beings would come from the heavens surrounded by bright light. In that time humans couldn't comprehend what this thing was so a reasonable thing to call it would be a God or an angel. Strange that so many sepperated races of people would all have religions that were based around these kind of beings that would come from the sky. If you were to look at this logically, the conclusion would be that they were alien life forms.


Check out "The Twelth Planet" by Zecharia Sitchin. Or go to http://www.mars-earth.com/sitchin.htm.
Bikerman
Silk2008 wrote:
miacps wrote:
Evidence of alien lifeforms may be in the bible, if the bible holds any credibility or accuracy that is. Back in that time beings would come from the heavens surrounded by bright light. In that time humans couldn't comprehend what this thing was so a reasonable thing to call it would be a God or an angel. Strange that so many sepperated races of people would all have religions that were based around these kind of beings that would come from the sky. If you were to look at this logically, the conclusion would be that they were alien life forms.


Check out "The Twelth Planet" by Zecharia Sitchin. Or go to http://www.mars-earth.com/sitchin.htm.
The link does not work.
It seems to me quite reasonable that different civilisations would have 'deities' that come from the sky. The sky represents something 'outside' and it is reasonable to assume that any God figure would be outside normal experience. It is not at all logical to conclude that this represents evidence for alien life forms.
Bryan_Bezzle
Bikerman wrote:
Silk2008 wrote:
miacps wrote:
Evidence of alien lifeforms may be in the bible, if the bible holds any credibility or accuracy that is. Back in that time beings would come from the heavens surrounded by bright light. In that time humans couldn't comprehend what this thing was so a reasonable thing to call it would be a God or an angel. Strange that so many sepperated races of people would all have religions that were based around these kind of beings that would come from the sky. If you were to look at this logically, the conclusion would be that they were alien life forms.


Check out "The Twelth Planet" by Zecharia Sitchin. Or go to http://www.mars-earth.com/sitchin.htm.
The link does not work.



Remove the last period
Bikerman
Bryan_Bezzle wrote:
Remove the last period

Ah yes. OK, I've only scanned the stuff (so much to read and so little time to waste on nonsense).
I see little of merit but I won't comment further since I haven't read his stuff in detail. Suffice it to say that I spent a lot of time reading and debunking Von Daniken's stuff (which is very similar) and I don't really have the appetite to repeat the process with Sitchen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zecharia_Sitchin#Controversy_over_his_views
Bryan_Bezzle
Yeah I was about to say wiki had some stuff about controversy over Sitchens ideas. He just seems to have too much information there for any of it to be widely regarded as true and I not have heard of any of it yet.
chasbeen
There is a lot of evidence and having looked into it i'm listing the following as the occurrences that are most convincing that they do exist. These examples assume the craft sighted were to advanced for humans to be sitting inside.
(1)Belgium UFO flap 1990
Air force General in charge of scrambling jets can't explain the sighting.
Evidence:
Official really close up picture of triangular craft
Radar recordings
Scrambled Jets pilots witnesses
(2)Mexico moving fleet of ufos on film. Distant solid objects moving together. Equipment used was cameras used normally foe recording drug trafficking between us and Mexico.(2004)
(3)Phoenix lights (1997). Huge solid craft overflying phoenix, Arizona. Eye witnesses numerous including state governer.
(4)2 weekends of suspended craft sighted over the whitehouse. Forced President of the united states
to make statements including "these present no threat" (1952)
Shocked
Bryan_Bezzle
chasbeen wrote:
There is a lot of evidence and having looked into it i'm listing the following as the occurrences that are most convincing that they do exist. These examples assume the craft sighted were to advanced for humans to be sitting inside.
(1)Belgium UFO flap 1990
Air force General in charge of scrambling jets can't explain the sighting.
Evidence:
Official really close up picture of triangular craft
Radar recordings
Scrambled Jets pilots witnesses
(2)Mexico moving fleet of ufos on film. Distant solid objects moving together. Equipment used was cameras used normally foe recording drug trafficking between us and Mexico.(2004)
(3)Phoenix lights (1997). Huge solid craft overflying phoenix, Arizona. Eye witnesses numerous including state governer.
(4)2 weekends of suspended craft sighted over the whitehouse. Forced President of the united states
to make statements including "these present no threat" (1952)
Shocked



Shag Harbor
Teezgaff
And many many many more .... Most recent STS 122 flight.. Just search YouTube for STS 122 or NASA TV. Or any of my previous posts.
chasbeen
I agree theres a lot out there.
Theres a growing mound of hoaxes and time wasters though as the power of image manipulation becomes more prevalent unfortunately.
I cant view the video of STS 122 at the moment but authorative sources are useful as a "filter" Exclamation
D'Artagnan
yes i do, i believe in outter space life.. but no ovnis nor abductions, i don't think someone that someone that can fly at superspeed would land here just to see some stupid life forms like us...
Teezgaff
Here's a good example of military sighting.

January 12th 2007, London Military Air Traffic Control contacted a
flight of US Air Force F-15s out of RAF Lakenheath, Suffolk, UK, to intercept an
unknown target they had picked up on radar at 3000 to 4000ft altitude.


Audio Recording.
http://www.uforeview.co.uk/F15sANDUFO.wav
talkingtree
for all those people who think there's no life beyond earth.. think about this..

evolution is defined as "A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form." Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.

thus when there are bacteria present... that means it may eventually evolve to complex eukaryotes such as human being. it might take a long time to happen but eventually it will get there

now let's look at the living conditions. earth belongs to a system that depends on constant energy from a source, and our solar system got the sun to provide us the basic need of energy. many prokaryotes and eukaryotes such as trees evolved to take in the heat energy and convert carbon dioxide to sugar and water, this process is called photosynthesis. and thus the cycle was made available to animals which allow many other living creatures to evolve.

you may think ok... so where's the bacteria from? no one knew the answer to that.. but one thing for sure is that you are here and u came from the 4.5billion years of evolution. the universe is around 13 million years old thus serving 3 times the evolution which we had. so why cant alien exist?
Bryan_Bezzle
You know what would be a good way to show the possibility of a superior race? If we as humans, could choose one out of the million+ species we have on Earth, and try to make it intelligent. I know we already experiment with gaining knowledge and understanding of animals like chimpanzees, birds, and others, but to "genetically manipulate" a species to further it along the evolutionary timeline. I dont know if we have that technology yet and it is certainly tip-toeing along an ethics tightrope, but if we could say, take border collies and manipulate their genes to make them intelligent to the comparison of neanderthals-- (I say a breed of dog because for one some border collies have vocabularies of hundreds of words and two, if we ever did do this than we would look back on the situation knowing thats man's best friend was vieing for this spot the whole time)-- , then we could definitely harbor the idea that our evolution was helped along by a superior race and other homo-versions were just them trying to get it right. Entertaining idea or pure rubbish?
liljp617
talkingtree wrote:
for all those people who think there's no life beyond earth.. think about this..

evolution is defined as "A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form." Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.

thus when there are bacteria present... that means it may eventually evolve to complex eukaryotes such as human being. it might take a long time to happen but eventually it will get there

now let's look at the living conditions. earth belongs to a system that depends on constant energy from a source, and our solar system got the sun to provide us the basic need of energy. many prokaryotes and eukaryotes such as trees evolved to take in the heat energy and convert carbon dioxide to sugar and water, this process is called photosynthesis. and thus the cycle was made available to animals which allow many other living creatures to evolve.

you may think ok... so where's the bacteria from? no one knew the answer to that.. but one thing for sure is that you are here and u came from the 4.5billion years of evolution. the universe is around 13 million years old thus serving 3 times the evolution which we had. so why cant alien exist?

Because there is zero evidence to support alien life forms existing...outside of conspiracy theories. What more reasoning is needed to make a conclusion? When there is remotely tangible evidence that alien life forms exist, then we can begin discussing their existence. Until then, it's a useless conversation that nobody can say anything about to make a difference.
loonix
http://www.mars-earth.com/sitchin.htm

Bikerman wrote:
The link does not work


For some reason the link had a full stop at the end. Link now works but I understand your not wanting to go there Wink

To answer the opening posters question. Do I beleive in aliens? - Absolutely!

Its reasonable to assume, given the sheer size of our universe, that there exists life elsewhere.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_sun#Life_cycle

"The Sun's current main sequence age, determined using computer models of stellar evolution and nucleocosmochronology, is thought to be about 4.57 billion years."

&

"The Sun will spend a total of approximately 10 billion years as a main sequence star."

Our sun in galactic terms is relatively young (middle-aged even for the pedantic :p) and our civilisation younger still. If we consider technological advances that have been made by mankind in the last 50 years alone, who knows what technologies will exist 100 years from now, 1000 years from now etc etc. If there is an older star out there, sustaining an intelligent presence then who knows what it would be capable of technology-wise. Currently stellar travel is an impossibility for mankind given our published scientific ability, however I can grasp how that may not be the case for a race a billion technological years ahead of us.

This possibility opens the door to the potential of visitation, tho it can be likened to trying to go and visit a particular grain of sand on a beach in Australia I suppose due to the sheer number of potential destinations open to an interstellar race.

In society we have many instances where eye-witness testimony counts for a lot. The criminal justice system for example. The more eye witnesses, then the more credible an event becomes. This logcic never seems to port over to the 'ET' question very well.

Rendlesham forest anyone?
Bikerman
loonix wrote:
In society we have many instances where eye-witness testimony counts for a lot. The criminal justice system for example. The more eye witnesses, then the more credible an event becomes. This logcic never seems to port over to the 'ET' question very well.
It's not quite that simple. If you go back a couple of centuries you could find any number of people who would swear they had seen, even spoken to, demons and spirits. Is it more believable because lots of people said so?
That doesn't mean, of course, that UFO sightings are all bogus - I don't believe they are for a minute. It just means what it says - unidentified. To extrapolate that to mean 'alien' is a big jump that requires a leap of faith - and I don't have such a faith.
oskuro
Well, i think michael jordan is an alien, but until i see one, i wont believe in aliens….. There must be life somewhere in the universe, but where??? Who knows…
Indi
Bikerman wrote:
loonix wrote:
In society we have many instances where eye-witness testimony counts for a lot. The criminal justice system for example. The more eye witnesses, then the more credible an event becomes. This logcic never seems to port over to the 'ET' question very well.
It's not quite that simple. If you go back a couple of centuries you could find any number of people who would swear they had seen, even spoken to, demons and spirits. Is it more believable because lots of people said so?
That doesn't mean, of course, that UFO sightings are all bogus - I don't believe they are for a minute. It just means what it says - unidentified. To extrapolate that to mean 'alien' is a big jump that requires a leap of faith - and I don't have such a faith.

Not to mention he's way overstating the case for eyewitness testimony. It most certainly does not count for "a lot". It is used in the criminal justice system only in lieu of other evidence, and even then it is brushed aside in a heartbeat if there is reason to believe the witness may be wrong - deliberately or accidentally. If ten thousand people place me at the scene of a crime, but i was unconscious and having an operation at the time and can prove this with videotape and hospital records, what do you think the court will decide?

i truly believe that many - if not most - people are being sincerely honest when they say they've seen extraterrestrials and/or their spacecraft. But that doesn't make it true. i also believe are being very sincere when they say they've talked to God (like, literally had a conversation with him/her/it) or seen demons or fairies. People see strange things all the time, and our minds are hard-wired to bend over backwards to fit something we've seen into something we understand. That's why we see faces in rock formations, and animal shapes in the clouds.

Obviously you can't judge the truth of their statements by how sincere they state them, because it's easy to really believe something that is just dead wrong when your senses or mind fools you, so you have to use some other metric to determine whether or not it is possible that they've seen aliens. Every other metric we use tells us that it is ludicrously impossible - the distances that would have to be travelled, the described nature of the aliens and their craft, their apparent behaviours, etc. - all of these things make the likelihood of alien visitors (as described in most encounter/abduction testimony) absurd.
TBSC
Bikerman wrote:
loonix wrote:
In society we have many instances where eye-witness testimony counts for a lot. The criminal justice system for example. The more eye witnesses, then the more credible an event becomes. This logcic never seems to port over to the 'ET' question very well.
It's not quite that simple. If you go back a couple of centuries you could find any number of people who would swear they had seen, even spoken to, demons and spirits. Is it more believable because lots of people said so?
That doesn't mean, of course, that UFO sightings are all bogus - I don't believe they are for a minute. It just means what it says - unidentified. To extrapolate that to mean 'alien' is a big jump that requires a leap of faith - and I don't have such a faith.

That's really true. Makes me wonder just how many people are delusional, even if it is the same delusion.
Indi
TBSC wrote:
Bikerman wrote:
loonix wrote:
In society we have many instances where eye-witness testimony counts for a lot. The criminal justice system for example. The more eye witnesses, then the more credible an event becomes. This logcic never seems to port over to the 'ET' question very well.
It's not quite that simple. If you go back a couple of centuries you could find any number of people who would swear they had seen, even spoken to, demons and spirits. Is it more believable because lots of people said so?
That doesn't mean, of course, that UFO sightings are all bogus - I don't believe they are for a minute. It just means what it says - unidentified. To extrapolate that to mean 'alien' is a big jump that requires a leap of faith - and I don't have such a faith.

That's really true. Makes me wonder just how many people are delusional, even if it is the same delusion.

Weeeelllll... >_< The correct answer, if you want to look at it that way, is "we all are".

Going back to what i was talking about with witnesses above: we know for a fact that we do not observe most of the real world directly. When you look around a room in a normal situation, you literally only "see" about 10% of what is there (that is observable - i am not talking about things that are hidden behind other things or outside the range of human vision). Then your brain stores a "schema" that it can use to reconstruct the scene - a script with the details. When you recall the scene and try to describe it later, you don't actually dig up a photographic image of the scene in your mind (unless you have eidetic memory, i guess), you "rebuild" the image from a list of the details.

All this works fine under normal circumstances, but when we're presented with really abnormal stimuli, we need a more complex schema to reconstruct things. For example, when we see a normal red apple, the schema can be as short as "apple, macintosh, diamond-shaped streak of green on one side" - but when we see a really bizarrely out of shape apple, it would be more like "apple, macintosh, purple on the bottom fading into orange at the top, stretched really tall and bent over like a hook, with a fluorescent pink smiley face on the front", and it can get even much longer than that the more strange the apple is. Eventually, our brains start to give up. When the schema gets really complex they switch gears and say "well, gee, if it's so far off from a standard apple, maybe it really isn't an apple at all, maybe it's an eggplant", and then it will try again to store it as a schema based on an eggplant and see if the schema is shorter.

So what probably happens with alien abduction stories is the victims - for example - wake up abruptly out of deep REM sleep, find their body can't move (because your motor control is disabled during REM sleep) and they can't focus their senses so that all they see and hear are random blurs, and then try to form a schema to understand those random inputs. The schema quickly starts to get out of hand... so they switch gears and see if they can find some other schema base that makes it simpler. Depending on the person, that could be angels or aliens.

So there are two reasons why everyone has similar stories. The first is that most people experience similar sensory input when they experience waking up like this (or whatever other type of sensory overload it is - could be drugs, visual flashes from an head injury in an accident, whatever. The second is that they have similar schema bases - they have all heard the same myths about angels and/or aliens. Put it together, voilà, you end up with tens of thousands of similar abduction stories that are all honestly believed by the people that claim them.

But this isn't delusion or hallucination. This is how your mind is supposed to work. And, when things are going normally, it works very well. It's only when you have to process really offbeat sensory input that you get wackiness.
TBSC
Indi wrote:
TBSC wrote:
Bikerman wrote:
loonix wrote:
In society we have many instances where eye-witness testimony counts for a lot. The criminal justice system for example. The more eye witnesses, then the more credible an event becomes. This logcic never seems to port over to the 'ET' question very well.
It's not quite that simple. If you go back a couple of centuries you could find any number of people who would swear they had seen, even spoken to, demons and spirits. Is it more believable because lots of people said so?
That doesn't mean, of course, that UFO sightings are all bogus - I don't believe they are for a minute. It just means what it says - unidentified. To extrapolate that to mean 'alien' is a big jump that requires a leap of faith - and I don't have such a faith.

That's really true. Makes me wonder just how many people are delusional, even if it is the same delusion.

Weeeelllll... >_< The correct answer, if you want to look at it that way, is "we all are".

Going back to what i was talking about with witnesses above: we know for a fact that we do not observe most of the real world directly. When you look around a room in a normal situation, you literally only "see" about 10% of what is there (that is observable - i am not talking about things that are hidden behind other things or outside the range of human vision). Then your brain stores a "schema" that it can use to reconstruct the scene - a script with the details. When you recall the scene and try to describe it later, you don't actually dig up a photographic image of the scene in your mind (unless you have eidetic memory, i guess), you "rebuild" the image from a list of the details.

All this works fine under normal circumstances, but when we're presented with really abnormal stimuli, we need a more complex schema to reconstruct things. For example, when we see a normal red apple, the schema can be as short as "apple, macintosh, diamond-shaped streak of green on one side" - but when we see a really bizarrely out of shape apple, it would be more like "apple, macintosh, purple on the bottom fading into orange at the top, stretched really tall and bent over like a hook, with a fluorescent pink smiley face on the front", and it can get even much longer than that the more strange the apple is. Eventually, our brains start to give up. When the schema gets really complex they switch gears and say "well, gee, if it's so far off from a standard apple, maybe it really isn't an apple at all, maybe it's an eggplant", and then it will try again to store it as a schema based on an eggplant and see if the schema is shorter.

So what probably happens with alien abduction stories is the victims - for example - wake up abruptly out of deep REM sleep, find their body can't move (because your motor control is disabled during REM sleep) and they can't focus their senses so that all they see and hear are random blurs, and then try to form a schema to understand those random inputs. The schema quickly starts to get out of hand... so they switch gears and see if they can find some other schema base that makes it simpler. Depending on the person, that could be angels or aliens.

So there are two reasons why everyone has similar stories. The first is that most people experience similar sensory input when they experience waking up like this (or whatever other type of sensory overload it is - could be drugs, visual flashes from an head injury in an accident, whatever. The second is that they have similar schema bases - they have all heard the same myths about angels and/or aliens. Put it together, voilà, you end up with tens of thousands of similar abduction stories that are all honestly believed by the people that claim them.

But this isn't delusion or hallucination. This is how your mind is supposed to work. And, when things are going normally, it works very well. It's only when you have to process really offbeat sensory input that you get wackiness.


Right that makes sense. That is why there is harm in believing something that is not necessary to interpret reality, because it results in delusions.
Luciferdf2
ive seen a ufo once and it was the scariest sh!t i have ever whitnessed. Not a day goes by i dont think about what i saw. What are they doing here. Why dont they hide when they visit? It confuses my mind to think about it. I dont even like to talk about what i saw because i think its terrifing. To me anyway.... I never really believed it untill i saw it with my own eyes and i was with 3 other people. Really after what i had seen i wished i could un-see it.
roninmedia
I've also seen a UFO before and while it didn't scare me, it certianly surprised me like hell.

I certainly believe in alien life. Hell, there's species on Earth that still remain undiscovered and we're supposed to know our planet well. The staggering numbers of planets, stars, galaxies, and possibly universes make it almost impossible to think Earth is the only planet that has produced intelligent life in the fifteen billion year history of this universe.
lone_hunter
noooooooooo aliens just can't be real they were created by ppl's imaginations and grew bigger and bigger
thegoswebs
I do believe that it is quite possible that there is other life on other planets considering we don't know a WHOLE lot about space, even though we do seem to know a lot. There is such a thing as area 51 that isn't fenced or sealed, but is however heavily guarded with infantry. I don't know if the US is hiding anything but it doesn't really matter. I'm more concerned with what's going on with our own species than worrying about what's going on on other planets. But considering we are all made of "star dust" it is quite possible that on another planet (they found a planet called dionisus (SP?) that has running water and oxygen, the things necessary for life as we know it) there is some kind of life considering that there are millions of other planets in the universe and we barely know what's inside the other planets in our solar system except for the elements they see with a spectrograph (i'm taking astronomy class lol) so yeah I believe there is such a thing as aliens that we perhaps havn't interacted with but sooner or later we may. Who knows? Cool
iguk
i do belive in alien because god create too many planet in the sky...but i also believe we are ( Mankind ) are the highest evolution that god gives....so the alien out there is 3 step behind and still evoluting.....dont worry aliens will invasion on earth but believe that we will travel to another planet someday..cause everyday earth source will empty...
iguk
dont think alien look like mars attack or ET...just think that alien somewhere on their planet still looking an evolution to growth...there is so many planet that have similiar solar system like us...so..maybe they are just like we do in 100 millions years ago....how..? Very Happy
iguk
aliens comes from hollywood...it represent their fear ....but if we look on our religion, every religion says that we are the highest living thing on galaxy...so i believe that aliens somewhere out there still looking or still processing like we do...may be they still be a single cell..with quiet ocean ( THEY STILL CALL "ALIENS" right ???)
Poetsunited
lol Alliens is as some ppl already said a way to make a lot of money...

It's a sci-fi invention the traditional image we have from alliens... weird looking guys with big eyes who come in peace :p

But think about this, the universe is extremely big so there could be other life forms out there...

Alien comes from alienus,a,um : latin for Different... so allien is just someone who is different, not from here...

anyway it would be nice if there were alliens out there... but i supose i'm to much of a sci-fi geek saying that :p
teencompforum
I do not i think they would of contacted us by now it is a silly theroy.
joostvane
I do not believe we are alone. Maybe there are other living things out there, just asking the same question as us. Or maybe, they already discovered us, and are waiting. I hope we will know some day Very Happy
CourtneysColumbines
I think that before we look for alliens, we should look at Earth first. We have so many things we can't prove right here, along with our undiscovered species. And looking at all our own ecosystems, especialy the ones out side the "goldie locks" conditions, would help us understand how allien ecosystems might work. It would be fun to meet some one so different from us and who was inteligent. Very Happy
DizzyDesign
Yes I believe. If there are so many planets in the universe why would Earth be the only one with intelligent species. Earth is very little in consideration with the universe.
We are not alone Laughing
Bikerman
DizzyDesign wrote:
Yes I believe. If there are so many planets in the universe why would Earth be the only one with intelligent species. Earth is very little in consideration with the universe.
We are not alone Laughing

Well it is certainly true that Earth is a spec in the Universe. How small a spec is difficult to quantify. As far as I can remember it is estimated that about 10% of 'sun like' stars will have planets (this may have changed as this is a very active field of research and I haven't read anything new for a few months).
The planets have to be in a 'habitable zone' according to current thinking (unless we posit various exotic forms of life that do not require liquid water and are not based on carbon). It does seem likely, however, that such planets are out there and probably in large numbers....
Wolf1918
I do believe that aliens exist somewhere 'out there'.

Now having made that statement, I have to give my definition of 'alien'.

A creature of non-terrestrial origin.

That does not automatically mean that the alien in question would be capable of space travel, or even that it would be an intelligent creature.

Any aliens we ever did find could just as well be as simple as a one celled creature (actually this would be closer to what we might find any time soon anyway) or a something similar to an insect, fish, plant or even a fungus. A little tiny ''non-intelligent'' critter just living its life the same way all the critters on our planet are just living their lives. They would look different, of course, because of their environment and their adaptations to their environment.

Do I believe that intelligent, space traveling aliens exist? I don't know. It's fun to think they do and I hope they do. It would be ''fascinating'' to say the least if there really were an entire community of space going creatures out there just waiting to be discovered, such as in Star Trek or Star Wars.

... and who's to say they're NOT waiting to see if we don't manage to blow ourselves up, and we finally do manage to make it out beyond the limits of our own tiny solar system.

Chad
chatrack
I thinks there is life like systems exists in other parts of universe.
Just like we developed there may be a self depending system

living according to the forces/fields acting on that planets

i have not seen them, but thinks if they exists they will be
friendly to human
Firilacroco
There are NO aliens!!! In the univers there are only rocks, planets and stars!
liljp617
Firilacroco wrote:
There are NO aliens!!! In the univers there are only rocks, planets and stars!

Really, so you don't think there is one living, single celled organism ANYWHERE in the entire universe? I would have to disagree. Obviously neither one of us knows, but the math behind it says it's just about impossible that there isn't other forms of life somewhere in the universe. Pretty sure nobody is claiming there are big green guys with huge eyes walking around and flying in space trying to take over Earth...
Melacos
I'm convinced that there must be something happening out there - not just intelligent life as we might imagine it(always in our own picture right??) - but hopefully way more intelligent than us Wink
No, but really I kinda expect any existence of otherworldly life, to be nothing like what has happened on earth. Well maybe there are similarities somewhere, but other than that there could be totally unfathomable beings; as science so far haven't figured out the deal with the proportions of the universe etc., in the same way maybe not all variations of 'life' can be comprehended by us...
Hunterofevil
if you can imagine the width of the universe (which is impossible to do) and if we are able now to find water on a planet called mars which is so nearby then of course i believe there should be some form of life somewhere in the universe.
If you would ask me if we would ever see it, or if i'd think it looks like those cartoonic aliens then i must say no definately not...

But it keeps people busy thinking bout it, and we'll never know: maybe our children will some day Smile
xavax
I feel sure that aliens must exist, but the chances that we ever come into contact of one are incredibly small.
finekiss
This is an interesting topic and i would like to give an opinion.
Well, If there are no Aliens, What good is the space in the universe for?
Anyway, I believe there is and they live amongst us,we cannot see them.
Some People call them ghosts.
space80
I thinks there is life like systems exists in other parts of universe.
swaraj
I don't believe in government conspiracy theories. Don't think they got the brains for it! But I do believe that aliens exist. I mean if we evolved like this on earth due to the situations here, in some other planet or galaxy, creatures could have evolved differently. Or may have evolved billions of years ago and might be like an upgraded version of ourselves.

We drink water coz our body is designed that way. Aliens might drink methane or something instead of water. Who knows? I think NASA is too stupid for believing that only water is the basic neccessity for life to evolve.
myleshi
Quote:
I think NASA is too stupid for believing that only water is the basic neccessity for life to evolve.


I think the search for extraterrestrial life starts from a basis we all know here: carbon based life dependent upon water. Now that’s not to say other forms of life exist: crystalline or gaseous, but we are all carbon based here, so the search starts with that assumption.

There is life elsewhere in the universe, the laws of probability pretty much dictate that, but what form it’s in: bacteria or otherwise intelligent is another matter.

If we are the only life in the universe, then its an awful waste of space.
chasbeen
Yes there is no doubt aliens exist.
liljp617
chasbeen wrote:
Yes there is no doubt aliens exist.


mhmm...so where do you get your information? Not saying you're wrong and I'm right, but how does one make such a commanding statement when we (humans) really don't have evidence of alien existence?
chasbeen
Frank Drakes equation:

N = R x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L

R is the rate at which stars have been born in the Milky Way per year.
fp is the fraction of these stars that have solar systems of planets.
ne is the average number of "Earthlike" planets (potentially suitable for life) in the typical solar system.
fl is the fraction of those planets on which life actually forms.
fi is the fraction of life-bearing planets where biological evolution produces an intelligent species.
fc is the fraction of intelligent species that become capable of interstellar radio communication.
L is the average lifetime of a communicating civilization in years.
Bikerman
We can estimate the first term, have a guess at the second and speculate about the third. The value for the last 4 terms could be anything from 0 (not including Earth) upwards.
I wonder, then, how do you arrive at the conclusion that alien life is certain?
chasbeen
Probability can never be 1.
But the likelyhood is extremely high.
Lets make it higher in our minds because the concept is , in some ways, hard to grasp.

When we say "aliens" no-one specified their intelligence we could be talking microbes here.
Bikerman
chasbeen wrote:
Probability can never be 1.
But the likelyhood is extremely high.
But you said 'there is no doubt'. That would be probability 1.
Quote:
When we say "aliens" no-one specified their intelligence we could be talking microbes here.
In which case the Drake equation is not useful - since it is designed to calculate the probability of intelligent life that we can contact (ie broadcasting in our own galaxy).
Only the first 4 terms would apply, and the term 'fl' is the one which is entirely unknown. We cannot currently make any intelligent statement about the possible values for this term, based on a sample-size of 1.

I actually agree that it is likely that life will have arisen in other places, given what we know about the ability of life to take hold in the most unlikely places here on earth. I don't think, however, that we can go beyond the word 'likely'.
skipsplinter
One day i saw 2 aliens in the air with guns they came to me and ask the time ..
I was scared but they fly etc :S
Bikerman
skipsplinter wrote:
One day i saw 2 aliens in the air with guns they came to me and ask the time ..
I was scared but they fly etc :S

Then mummy woke you up?
balend
Simple answer: YES. The universe is huge and to think only humans or creatures on Earth are the only life form is just plain nonsense. There has to be other form of life.
liljp617
Bikerman wrote:
I actually agree that it is likely that life will have arisen in other places, given what we know about the ability of life to take hold in the most unlikely places here on earth. I don't think, however, that we can go beyond the word 'likely'.


This was my point put into clearer terms Razz
Tom7
Dont worry, that is only a glitch in the matrix.
gtg agent smith coming to get me.
everfine99
yes

metalfreek
I think there is an ALien life. Just inagine there are 10^11 stars in milky way galaxy and there are about 10^11 galaxy. So if we play the game of probability then there is no doubt that there is certainly a star like our sun with a solar system similar to us which support life as we know it.

But there is another thing on this. We use oxygen and glucose of our energy similarly there are 100's of chemical raction which generate energy. All I am saying is that the Alian life form is not necessarily the way we have.
deadswan
I believe in livings things somewhere in space, and I don't really believe in god as there is nothing realistic about im being able to create a planet, and if he could then who created the other planets? and why is nothing on them right now?

I think that if there are 'aliens' out there then they are either behind us with their technology or at our level or we would know about them by now... But who knows, maybe they just don't want us to know Laughing
Socioed
Yes. Aliens do exist, but I doubt they are in the form that we think they are in. They are probably some form of unicellular bacteria.
agudosnet
I believe that they exist somewhere out there. If there friendly or not i dont know, but i dont expect to meet them anytime soon anyway
Bikerman
agudosnet wrote:
I believe that they exist somewhere out there. If there friendly or not i dont know, but i dont expect to meet them anytime soon anyway

You say that you are a degree science student...OK...and this is the best you can do?
Ouch!
mk12327
The probability of the existence of aliens is very high, given that the universe is so huge. But even if they do exist, do you think they would be interested enough to actually get contacted with us? It is just like us to the other animals. How many of you ever try talking to animals? (I know that some people do that, but they are the rare handfuls)
Related topics
Star Wars vs Star Trek!
do u believe in UFOs or aliens?or have u ever seen them?
science vs. religion
UFOs, ghosts and other paranormal stuff
Aliens - Myth or reality?
Do aliens exist
Do Aliens Exist?
Was there any point to sending men to the moon?
ALIENS AND UFOs
Aliens!
Is it more logical to believe in God?
If you went back in time
aliens
Did Extra Terrestrials visit the Earth ?
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Science -> General Science

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.