You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!

Australia win the Cricket World Cup...again

Master Yoda
Australia put the seal on the most dominant campaign in World Cup history, securing their fourth title and their third in a row since 1999 thanks to Adam Gilchrist's scintillating 149 from 104 balls. But that, sadly, is not what the final of the ICC World Cup West Indies 2007 (to give it its full and fully deserved title) will be remembered for. In a display of cack-handedness that heaped new levels of farce upon a farcical seven weeks, the final overs of a broken contest were played out in near-darkness, penetrated only by the glow of the pavilion lights and the bewildered blinking of 20,000 flash bulbs.

Whatever went on in those overs is anyone's guess. It was too dark for the fielders to see anything, let alone any of the fans in the stadium or the press in the gantry, and besides, the Australians had already celebrated their moment of victory. That came after the sixth ball of the 33rd over, when the Sri Lankans - to all intents and purposes - accepted an offer for bad light, and appeared to have conceded the game with an improbable requirement of 63 from 18 balls.

What happened next will doubtless be the subject of blame-games, buck-passing and recriminations. Australia's celebratory huddle was broken up by a tap on the shoulder from the umpire Aleem Dar; the groundstaff who had been unpegging the onfield logos were told to nail them back down and reposition the pitch markers, and out trooped the players to block their way into the twilight. It was asinine, undignified, and entirely appropriate for a tournament that long since detached itself from the origins of sporting contests.

But let's concentrate on the onfield action, because - surprising as it may seem amid such a torrent of embarrassment - there was some pretty good cricket on display until officialdom stepped in to wreck everyone's memories. For all the romantic notions that Sri Lanka brought to their second final appearance in four tournaments - the mysteries of their bowling attack and the impishness of their batsmen - Australia's ruthlessness was absolute, as they extended their unbeaten run in World Cup matches to 29 since May 1999.

And it was Gilchrist who stormed to the fore, demonstrating an eye for the big occasion that is the preserve of few. This was his third scene-stealer in consecutive World Cup finals. Against Pakistan at Lord's in 1999, he cracked 54 from 36 balls; four years later against India at Johannesburg, he made 57 from 48. But nothing quite compared to this. Once the sun had come out and Gilchrist had gauged the pace and bounce of a rock-hard and true surface, there was no reining him - or Australia - in.

Gilchrist's innings was the highest ever made in a World Cup final, beating the mark of 140 set by his captain, Ricky Ponting, four years ago, and it was launched in a stand of 172 for the first wicket with Matthew Hayden, who made 38 from 55 balls before picking out Mahela Jayawardene in the covers.

Hayden's innings took his tournament tally to an incredible 659 runs at 73.22 - second only to Sachin Tendulkar's 671 in the 2003 World Cup - but today he was as anonymous as at any time in the past seven weeks. It did not matter a jot, for his performance as a quick-sprinting second fiddle was second-to-none. By the time of Hayden's dismissal, Gilchrist was already sitting pretty on 119, having faced almost five more overs than his partner.

Though Jayawardene had prevaricated at the toss, admitting he had been in two minds as to what he'd have done if he had won, Australia were in no doubt whatsoever. Five times in this tournament they had batted first and posted scores in excess of 300, and that would have been six in a row in a full-length contest. Gilchrist set the tone by clubbing Chaminda Vaas for four and six in the second over, while Lasith Malinga - the deadliest weapon in the Sri Lankan armoury - opted for accuracy over explosiveness.

Malinga went for just six runs in his first spell of four overs, but he was clocking an average of 84 mph, a good 10mph slower than in his devastating semi-final performance. It meant that the early breakthrough Sri Lanka so needed never materialised, especially when Dilhara Fernando - who began tidily enough from round the wicket - dropped a sharp return chance down by his shins when Gilchrist had made a run-a-ball 31.

The moment was lost and with it went Sri Lanka's best hope of controlling the tempo of the match that had been reduced to 38 overs by early rain. Fernando was a broken man after that - his next three deliveries were clubbed for four, four and six, the last of which very nearly took out the fire engine next to the 3Ws stand at long-on. It can only have been there to douse the ardour of Australia's batsmen, because Gilchrist was absolutely smoking. He brought up his 15th ODI hundred from just 72 balls with a drilled four over long-off, and thereafter heaved through the line with impunity, trusting his eye, the surface and the fact that the fight had gone out of his opponents.

Sri Lanka's batsmen did their best in the face of a spiralling run-rate, swinging the blade with gusto even as the cameras in the crowd betrayed the fading of both the light and their hopes. While Kumar Sangakkara and Sanath Jayasuriya were adding 116 for the second wicket, the contest was alive, but Sangakkara miscued Brad Hogg to Ponting at midwicket, before Jayasuriya, in the final appearance of a competition he has graced since 1992, was bowled by a flatter, faster delivery from the part-time spin of Michael Clarke.

Glenn McGrath, another man making his final bow, then seized another segment of the limelight by striking with his penultimate delivery in international cricket. It was not his greatest ball by any means - a legside full-toss that Russel Arnold (another retiree) popped off his hip to a diving Gilchrist. But it took his tournament tally to 26 wickets - a record - and his overall World Cup tally to 71 - another record.

Australia were the deserved winners of this contest, and in truth Sri Lanka were worthy runners-up - they plugged away with composure in the face of overwhelming odds, and the margin of Australia's victory was their slimmest in both the tournament and in their three latest World Cup wins. But the manner in which the victory was signed and sealed will continue to grate long after the teams have flown home. Such is the nature of the modern-day game of cricket.

Source : Cricinfo

I've been saying it.. I've been saying that this is gonna happen for the past few years and it did.. Go Aussies Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
Master Yoda wrote:

I've been saying it.. I've been saying that this is gonna happen for the past few years and it did.. Go Aussies Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy

Wel aren't you a genius?? Laughing Laughing Noooooooobody saw that onecoming did they?? haha...

.. Sorry mate, just cant say that Aussie winning was at all unexpected, they have been the form team for yeeeears
Yup Australia won and they deserve it also it was their day not Sri Lanka. Everything went right for Australia and wrong for Sri Lanka. Aussi's won the toss , then the game were reduced to 38 overs in a slower pitch and to everyones amazed there was no early swing. Sri Lankan fast bowlers were having a nightmare.

It was a one man show from even Australia side, it was all about Gilchrist who played the greatest inning ever played in a world cup finals. Sri Lankan batsmen did their best, Australian bowlers didn't bother them [easy to see that with a run rate over 6.3] Their problem was Mega required run rate which was over 7.5.

Sri Lankans deserve to be runners up, They put up a far more better fight than any other team did against Aussi's in this tournament. They didn't give up and fight back for something looked impossible. They didnt seems fear Australian bowlers like others teams did and which happened to be those teams downfall.

But i still think the game should had postpone to next day. Not for the sake of Sri Lanka but for a better game. Australia had a chance to put up a 300+ score and we would had about to watch a great run chase Which Sri lankans are normally good at. Also they would had able to play normal game without worrying about the D/L. The final match would had more spicy and exciting if so.
Aussies are the true world champions and they deserved it. They played their game hard and got the reward for that. India has a lot to learn from the Aussies, if they have to improve their records.
Master Yoda
cghq wrote:

Wel aren't you a genius?? Laughing Laughing Noooooooobody saw that onecoming did they?? haha...

.. Sorry mate, just cant say that Aussie winning was at all unexpected, they have been the form team for yeeeears

Nope, actually, there were a lot of cricket experts who were saying that India was the country who looked much stronger than it was in 2003.. and they were saying that we might just see new World Champs this time.. OK, they did use "might" but still.. it really looked like India might just do it this time.. wow, they really did us proud by getting out of the group stage itself.. Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes
Never mind.. I still love the Aussies though.. and some jealous people had started asking whether Gilly's squash ball was legal or not.. the nerve of those people.. Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad
As you say sadly 2007 world cup will be remembered for the complete shambles in terms of the end of the final and the fact that half of the matches were played to near-empty grounds.

I support Australia and they deserved to win and am glad they did so - however this world cup was notable for a dearth of exciting contests.

In particular who's idea was it to include teams like Bermuda and Scotland (that said - the blinding catch taken by the fat Bermudan bowler will go down in history as one of the great world cup moments!). Keep the format the same but have 12 teams in 3 groups, with the best 2 of each going to a super-six round robin competition - followed by the semis and a final.

The 12 teams should be Aus,NZ,WI,IND,PAK,ENG,SA,ZM,SL,BANG,IRE,KENYA

The one thing that can be said is that WC 2011 things can only improve!
Yeah Well Australia was the number one team and did deserved to win and they did so. But yes as you guys said it was a long and boring wold cup and i only watched the semis and the finals .
cghq wrote:
Master Yoda wrote:

I've been saying it.. I've been saying that this is gonna happen for the past few years and it did.. Go Aussies Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy

Wel aren't you a genius?? Laughing Laughing Noooooooobody saw that onecoming did they?? haha...

.. Sorry mate, just cant say that Aussie winning was at all unexpected, they have been the form team for yeeeears

Uhm, well ... South Africa was actually ranked the number one team, but as usual - they choked. Smile
Related topics
[OFFICIAL] World Cup 2006
Cricket World Cup 2006
Who do you think's going to win the Soccer World Cup
Who is going to win the football world cup?
Cricket World cup 2007
ICC [Cricket] World Cup 2007 {Only one thread please - Mod }
The Cricket world CUP! CWC
Cricket, World Cup Updates
T20 World Cup - Rock$ or Shake$
who will win the world cup T20 2009
Who will win The World Cup?
who according to u will win cricket WORLD CUP 2011?????????
Cricket World Cup
Was India really a deserved winner of the World Cup 2011?
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Sports and Entertainment -> Sports

© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.