America have provided proof of what they say is Iranian interference in Iraq,they say that Iran are behind most of the road side and car bombs in Iraq,is this true or are America using alleged interference,as an excuse to get other nations to back them in an invasion of Iran.
Possible reasons for invasion of Iran are of course Irans insistence on creating nuclear energy,which a by product of is, nuclear weapons. So is this proof of interference in Iraq,a way for America to invade Iran and make sure they dont develop nuclear weapons,and so dont lose their grip on the middle east. Iran having nuclear capabilities could threaten Americas control of the region,invading Iran could make sure they take that control back.
The middle east is a complicated part of the world,nobody would care what went on there if it wasnt for the fact that they supply most of the world's oil,so if true should America invade Iran? And if they do,will that invasion be for the reasons they give,or would they have ulterior motives?
Possible reasons for invasion of Iran are of course Irans insistence on creating nuclear energy,which a by product of is, nuclear weapons. So is this proof of interference in Iraq,a way for America to invade Iran and make sure they dont develop nuclear weapons,and so dont lose their grip on the middle east. Iran having nuclear capabilities could threaten Americas control of the region,invading Iran could make sure they take that control back.
The middle east is a complicated part of the world,nobody would care what went on there if it wasnt for the fact that they supply most of the world's oil,so if true should America invade Iran? And if they do,will that invasion be for the reasons they give,or would they have ulterior motives?
