FRIHOSTFORUMSFAQTOSBLOGSDIRECTORY
You are invited to Log in or Register a Frihost Account!

Darkmatter!

 


Physicist
Hi ppl,
what are you thinking on Dark matter?This is a problem in cosmology.Its not solved yet.
Its really strange!Few years ago it was told that dark matter is made of a particle neutralino.But none could not identify it.
Its really strange that we can see it but observing the result of its existence.
In our galaxy scientists ovserved that all stars are moving at almost same speed at closed to center and at the edge. So something must working.Thats darkmatter.Using its gravity. I Want more information on darkmatter.
Expecting interesting discussion in this topic. So start posting.Thank you.Bye
einstein
Many aspects of dark matter remain speculative. The DAMA/NaI experiment has claimed to directly detect dark matter passing through the Earth, though most scientists remain skeptical since negative results of other experiments are (almost) incompatible with the DAMA results if dark matter consists of neutralinos.

Data from a number of lines of evidence, including galaxy rotation curves, gravitational lensing, structure formation, and the fraction of baryons in clusters and the cluster abundance combined with independent evidence for the baryon density, indicate that 85-90% of the mass in the universe does not interact with the electromagnetic force. This "dark matter" is evident through its gravitational effect. Several categories of dark matter have been postulated.
Arrow Baryonic dark matter
Arrow Non-baryonic dark matter which is divided into three different types:

Arrow Hot dark matter - nonbaryonic particles that move ultrarelativistically
Arrow Warm dark matter - nonbaryonic particles that move relativistically
Arrow Cold dark matter - nonbaryonic particles that move non-relativistically
Bikerman
Physicist wrote:
Hi ppl,
what are you thinking on Dark matter?This is a problem in cosmology.Its not solved yet.
Its really strange!Few years ago it was told that dark matter is made of a particle neutralino.But none could not identify it.
Its really strange that we can see it but observing the result of its existence.
In our galaxy scientists ovserved that all stars are moving at almost same speed at closed to center and at the edge. So something must working.Thats darkmatter.Using its gravity. I Want more information on darkmatter.
Expecting interesting discussion in this topic. So start posting.Thank you.Bye


Einstein gives a good summary I think.
There is little to add other than current models show that Dark Matter could account for more than 90% (as much as 99% in some models) and that even so it is not thought to be enough to overcome expansion and cause a 'big crunch'.

Regards
Chris
einstein
well, its only a hypothesis about the 'big crunch' , but i guess it might happen. we can't say anything unless we discover more about the dark matter.........for instance, even though i read a lot about dark matter and dark energy, i don't exactly know dark matter's STATE!!! in which state of matter does it occur??? might be plasma, but well......i don't know!!!

and by the way, if you want to know more about the composition of the universe, here is the pie chart:



so, according to me, dark matter and energy combined, which makes about 95%, may be enough to cause a 'big crunch' though its more likely that the universe will keep expanding!!!

A REAL MYSTERY!!!!!!!
MeddlingMonk
How do we know dark matter even exists? What if we've got the whole idea of the universe wrong (starting with the Big Bang) and this dark matter doesn't exist? 'Cause as far as I know, we haven't found any yet, nor is there any proof of its existence.
Bikerman
MeddlingMonk wrote:
How do we know dark matter even exists? What if we've got the whole idea of the universe wrong (starting with the Big Bang) and this dark matter doesn't exist? 'Cause as far as I know, we haven't found any yet, nor is there any proof of its existence.

There is, however, plenty of support for the notion.
Gravitational Binding Energy
Galactic rotation curves
Velocity dispersions of galaxies
Missing matter in clusters of galaxies
Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies

Regards
Chris
MeddlingMonk
Quote:
There is, however, plenty of support for the notion.
Gravitational Binding Energy
Galactic rotation curves
Velocity dispersions of galaxies
Missing matter in clusters of galaxies
Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies


Fascinating - thanks for the links. I will agree that for the time being, dark matter is undoubtedly the best explanation for some things - but I'm still hesitant to say that it exists.
Bikerman
MeddlingMonk wrote:

Fascinating - thanks for the links. I will agree that for the time being, dark matter is undoubtedly the best explanation for some things - but I'm still hesitant to say that it exists.

And there is no real problem with that stance since even scientists would say that the matter is still in the hypothetical stage and has not yet attained the status of solid theory. The only point I was making is that there are lots of reasons to believe DM exists and it is not just the creation of some fevered physicist's imagination.
Time, as usual, will tell.

Regards
Chris
stone1343
I'm with you, MeddlingMonk. I know the scientists say that the best way to explain certain things is with dark matter, I just think they could be wrong. I'm not coming at this from the point of view of a religious person, either. I don't believe in God, but I also don't believe in dark energy.

(Sorry if this is a double post)
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Science -> General Science

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2007 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.