FRIHOST FORUMS SEARCH FAQ TOS BLOGS COMPETITIONS
You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!


File sizes... using multiple or single, gif or jpeg?





psycosquirrel
Okay, so I am making my site. It is very graphical, and I was wondering if it would be more efficient to keep the backgrounds/buttons for my pages as 1 big jpeg or gif, or to divide each up into pieces in a table... Also, which would be better; gif or jpeg? I know gif is index-based, so I believe that a jpeg would be better... Anyways, I would appreciate it if anyone with some knowlege of images would give me some input.
Texas Al
I think one big image loads faster than a table full of images.

As for GIF (or PNG) vs. JPEG, GIF (or PNG) is better for vector images with no antialiasing and a small number of colors.






BTW, you just gave me an idea:

I'm going to experiment with having a CSS-only site where all the button graphics and visual elements are one physical file, just shifted around by specifying their position. I can't think of any reason this wouldn't work, and it would probably really save download time. After all, that's how some video games handle sprites.
psycosquirrel
well, that is basically what i might try to do. the image has few colors, and, using an optimized gif with a minimum pallette.. it should work fine. thanks for confirming that.
Texas Al
I hope you post here when you try it. Maybe we can test the load-speeds for your site from wherever on the net we are.
RaFaMp
if:

Transparency: GIF
Normal Site: JPG @ High Quality
Scott
Although GIFs can have really small sizes compared to JPEGs sometimes.
RaFaMp
Scott wrote:
Although GIFs can have really small sizes compared to JPEGs sometimes.


yes but for lots of colors in site gif is crap
HalfBrian
I think for a site, you should really use cut up images. Using a program like ImageReady (i've never used it, but i've heard its good) is easy to cut up images, but to do it right, do it by hand, it will save you precious bandwidth and will load faster. If you have it, Flash would be an excelent idea.

You should probably use GIFs for the lower color images and jpeg on all the others.
Tieskevo
RaFaMp wrote:
if:

Transparency: GIF
Normal Site: JPG @ High Quality


agree, GIF is very crappy unless used for transparency
Texas Al
HalfBrian wrote:
...it will save you precious bandwidth and will load faster. If you have it, Flash would be an excelent idea.


LOL. Saving precious bandwidth and suggesting Flash in the next sentence. ^_^
snowboardalliance
What about load times for a wide gradient, versus a single pixel width one loaded multiple times?
xoAznSweetie
High Quality JPG

You may want to chop up the images if u can't save it at high quality because it may get like little dots on it. Then you go to your site and see it and you go from Confused to Shocked !! hahaha. Make each of the piece about the hieght of my sig if your using it for layout. Very Happy
phervers
what i do is use them both actually. You should use jpg's for images like photos with lots of colors and fuzzy areas. When you have an image with not a lot of colors and large areas of the same color gif's will be smaller. Also always consider using css. For example when making gradient under your header create 1px wide gif and use css to repeat it horizontally.
Related topics
File upload with PHP, Build an upload database for your site
Windows Vista Official Thread
Question
Best Encryption Software
Picture Format
Microsoft vs. open-source in file sizes
Gif Animator Software
Thumbnails W/O extra file
Icon Design: Bitmap vs Vector. The explanation
image on top of image
Recommended FREE/SHAREWARE Software
Any program that modifies picture resolution?
Best filemanager?
Great free photo editor
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Webmaster and Internet -> Design Tips

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.