I see sticky's for PS3 and Xbox360, but not alot of love for Nintendo or specifically the Wii.
I'm definately getting a Wii, and I don't actually know anyone whose choice isn't the Wii.
We've also had a 360 at our schools (game design at uni) "games room" since launch, but the most anyone ever played on that is a bit of Hexic, or whatever it's called. I think even the old Xbox has seen more action.
And as for hitting weakspots to deal massive damage? Well.. it's a bit been there, done that, dont'cha think?
<James007>ALWAYS MENTION THE SOURCE + USE QUOTE TAGS, POST REMOVED</James007>
wtf? why on earth did you just type that speck? point grabbing maybe?
and i agree i am getting a wii, without question
Sergiy, use quote tags if you took that from another place.
And it was quite unmotivated.
I'll be getting a Wii, though it will be quite expensive here in Finland...
seems really cool ide like to get one
10 reasons why the PS3 beats all you nintendo fanboys:
1 Nvidia RSX GPU.
2 Cell CPU with 8 dual-cores
3 Bluetooth
4 Blu-Ray (54 GB storage space)
5 Hard drive
6 wireless controllers with motion sensibilty, ergonomically shaped
7 Memory slots for various types of media
8 Support for 7 controllers
9 Plays all sorts of media (mp3, wav, avi, mpg etc.)
10 It looks tons cooler
I know you people like nintendo, and don't get me wrong, so did I, until the N64 came out, still using cartridges. Zelda was GREAT, Goldeneye was GREAT, perfect dark was GREAT, and hell, even diddy kong racing was fun, but nintendo seems to always aim for children and new playing styles, whereas sony (and microsuck) aim for the mainstream masses of multimedia, and therefore get way better performing consoles.
Anyway, that's my opinion, and your opinions are yours. Nothing I can do about it.
| eLto wrote: |
10 reasons why the PS3 beats all you nintendo fanboys:
1 Nvidia RSX GPU.
2 Cell CPU with 8 dual-cores
3 Bluetooth
4 Blu-Ray (54 GB storage space)
5 Hard drive
6 wireless controllers with motion sensibilty, ergonomically shaped
7 Memory slots for various types of media
8 Support for 7 controllers
9 Plays all sorts of media (mp3, wav, avi, mpg etc.)
10 It looks tons cooler
I know you people like nintendo, and don't get me wrong, so did I, until the N64 came out, still using cartridges. Zelda was GREAT, Goldeneye was GREAT, perfect dark was GREAT, and hell, even diddy kong racing was fun, but nintendo seems to always aim for children and new playing styles, whereas sony (and microsuck) aim for the mainstream masses of multimedia, and therefore get way better performing consoles.
Anyway, that's my opinion, and your opinions are yours. Nothing I can do about it. |
But PS3 is just an upgrade from the PS2, but Wii is something totally different than Game Cube!
PS3 is more powerful, yes, but Wii will win the market, people will buy Wii but not PS3 that much!


| eLto wrote: |
10 reasons why the PS3 beats all you nintendo fanboys:
1 Nvidia RSX GPU.
2 Cell CPU with 8 dual-cores
3 Bluetooth
4 Blu-Ray (54 GB storage space)
5 Hard drive
6 wireless controllers with motion sensibilty, ergonomically shaped
7 Memory slots for various types of media
8 Support for 7 controllers
9 Plays all sorts of media (mp3, wav, avi, mpg etc.)
10 It looks tons cooler
I know you people like nintendo, and don't get me wrong, so did I, until the N64 came out, still using cartridges. Zelda was GREAT, Goldeneye was GREAT, perfect dark was GREAT, and hell, even diddy kong racing was fun, but nintendo seems to always aim for children and new playing styles, whereas sony (and microsuck) aim for the mainstream masses of multimedia, and therefore get way better performing consoles.
Anyway, that's my opinion, and your opinions are yours. Nothing I can do about it. |
If I want a powerful machine I buy a good computer, that I can upgrade later.
But if I want an unique and funny console, I buy a Wii.
PS3 just has nice graphics, nothing new actually, just the same old thing.
Wii instead, I mean, look at that thing. Great design, really innovating. They actually came up with something comepletely new, which deserves a lot of credit in my opinion.
You play Nintendo for the gameplay mainly, and not the graphics. Even though they don't look bad at all.
If you want a fast, nice looking console, pick PS3.
If you want nice looking, innovating and lots of gameplay, pick Wii.
I'll definately get a Wii as soon as it comes out, not doubt.
It seems that at time goes on, Microsoft and Sony both seem to be trying to label suped up computers as video game systems sporting their own custom Operating System and controller ports... Games like theirs can be played for similar money on a computer and still have all the functionality of a Computer and not just what someone decided to slap on a console... fun is not about stats... it's about being entertained. As far as I'm concerned the wii shows far more promise of being entertaining then the 360 or ps3...
Also I have played the 360, and it's pretty, but one of the better games, Dead or Alive, is nothing more then an arcade fighter with online support... doesn't matter how 3d, pretty, or more accurate the game and fighting is... it's still a 1 on 1 fighter where newbies button mash and experienced players use memorized button combinations... boring....
sorry for the rant, just can't wait to actually do something new for a change...
| reallyjoel wrote: |
And as for hitting weakspots to deal massive damage? Well.. it's a bit been there, done that, dont'cha think? |
I thought this was a Wii thread, not a PS3 bashing thread.
| Whong wrote: |
But PS3 is just an upgrade from the PS2, but Wii is something totally different than Game Cube!
|
So you need "something totally different," otherwise you won't buy it? Could you (if you have a cube + n64) explain to me why you have a gamecube and games that don't use innovative controllers? The gamecube was just an upgrade from the N64. But did you buy it? If you did buy a cube, then you're stating there's no problem buying something that's "just an upgrade" over the previous system.
edit: sorry for the double post... meant to edit the other one
I dont know what console im gonna get. I hear ps3 is like a multimedia, but d'know yet...
| Quote: |
| but nintendo seems to always aim for children and new playing styles |
Oh Sure! That would explain the 10 or so Wii Release Games that are rated 'Mature'
The Specs are for PS3...And dude, they are amazing. Have you seen the Kill Zone 2 Video?
Damn...
lol,
Check out this Video, Wii VS PS3.
Sooooooo Right.
Yet Soo Rong:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDZGYqquSr0
Also:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZJw9sbOTsc
^Which is a great Video. LOL.
| Saryon wrote: |
PS3 just has nice graphics, nothing new actually, just the same old thing.
Wii instead, I mean, look at that thing. Great design, really innovating. They actually came up with something comepletely new, which deserves a lot of credit in my opinion.
You play Nintendo for the gameplay mainly, and not the graphics. Even though they don't look bad at all.
If you want a fast, nice looking console, pick PS3.
If you want nice looking, innovating and lots of gameplay, pick Wii.
I'll definately get a Wii as soon as it comes out, not doubt. |
I definitely agree with you Saryon, that's the way things are, PS3 just an upgrade of PS2, Wii much more than an upgrade of GC.
| Kelcey wrote: |
| So you need "something totally different," otherwise you won't buy it? Could you (if you have a cube + n64) explain to me why you have a gamecube and games that don't use innovative controllers? The gamecube was just an upgrade from the N64. But did you buy it? If you did buy a cube, then you're stating there's no problem buying something that's "just an upgrade" over the previous system. |
At that time there was nothing more innovative, but now that there is I wouldn't like to just spend almost 2.5 times more money for only an upgrade. Wii is cheap, but really good still. You of course can buy a PS3, but most here want a Wii, because we need something different and new!
the wii will be the best nintendo system yet. the fact that you can buy every classic nintendo game is awsome. fist thing i do is buy all the zelda games for it. nintendo has always been my favorite video game company. without them we wouldnt know mario or luigi. how could you live without are two favorite plumbers?
| eLto wrote: |
10 reasons why the PS3 beats all you nintendo fanboys:
1 Nvidia RSX GPU.
2 Cell CPU with 8 dual-cores
3 Bluetooth
4 Blu-Ray (54 GB storage space)
5 Hard drive
6 wireless controllers with motion sensibilty, ergonomically shaped
7 Memory slots for various types of media
8 Support for 7 controllers
9 Plays all sorts of media (mp3, wav, avi, mpg etc.)
10 It looks tons cooler
I know you people like nintendo, and don't get me wrong, so did I, until the N64 came out, still using cartridges. Zelda was GREAT, Goldeneye was GREAT, perfect dark was GREAT, and hell, even diddy kong racing was fun, but nintendo seems to always aim for children and new playing styles, whereas sony (and microsuck) aim for the mainstream masses of multimedia, and therefore get way better performing consoles.
Anyway, that's my opinion, and your opinions are yours. Nothing I can do about it. |
Alright, so let's run down the list:
1. Wow, a new nVidia graphics card... okay, I am probably getting one in my new laptop (if HP doesn't fight against me too hard).
2. Cell CPU, impressive indeed. It's a powerful chip, but will it be used to its fullest potential? Perhaps... perhaps not. And if it does, what's keeping the PS3 from total meltdown? More power = More heat. Funny how we don't get a spec of it's cooling system.
3. Bluetooth, okay... I don't care.
4. Blu-Ray, again impressive. This one is actually one of the big ones of the PS3. However, it would've been better if Sony established a firm ground for the Blu-Ray already (like beating the HD-DVD) then have the PS3 serve as a foundation for the Blu-Ray. I really like the Blu-Ray, so I hope Sony doesn't screw it up like it did the UMD... then again I didn't like the UMD or PSP to begin with...
5. Hard drive... my computer has one. Whoopdeedoo...
6. Wireless controller... you basically ripped the Wiimote off... Yes, you did look into the technology after the PS2's Dual Shock 2, but you never executed anything remotely like it until the Wii wowed the crowd with their Wiimote. And taking away the rumble feature? Man, that's low especially since the console costs a lot already. Should've just pulled a Microsoft and throw money at your problems to get the right to keep the rumble feature.
7. Memory slots for various types of media? Like what? I am a gamer and I only need to get what I need for gaming. I don't need a 12-in-1 media card reader or whatever the hell the PS3 has in it. Flash drive, okay, that's understandable, USB, obviously. Other crap, that's just more reason to take money from me.
8. Support for 7 controllers. Umm... what just happened here? How did we get from 8 to 7? I guess in Sony's perspective it's pretty good since they only offered 2 controller ports to begin with on their older consoles (something which I hated, but man I still love that original PS).
9. I can care less. How am I on this forum? I have a COMPUTER! That's how! I can play all those media. And they're basically the same type of media, they've audio/video files. Get a grip and don't make it look like it's more than it is.
10. Yes... I have to agree the George Foreman-grill look is quite stylish... well I don't like it, but I'm sure some people do.
Shooters will be alot of fun on the Wii, especially when they design a controller shaped like a Thompson or something (although I really doubt Nintendo would do something like that). However, I had bad expiriences(?) with Nintendo, so I won't get one.
I'd personally like both. If I had a good TV, I'd love to use a ps3 to play blu-rays. Not really a factor.
I'll be a wii because I missed out on the gc and I'm looking forward to playing some of the titles like Metroid, Zelda, Mario, and SSB. Nintendo always has great titles for their flagship series, and I missed a bunch--I'm really looking forward to it. Besides, I'm definitely not going to put up the cash for the ps3 until the price goes down. Way too much money. Wii has a decent pricetag.
The Wii is "simply an upgrade" of the GC aswell, except it has the "wiimote". So that's what you call it now. infact, compared to a PS3, the wii isn't even a good upgrade. the hardware specs aren't even close to even the 360!
| eLto wrote: |
| The Wii is "simply an upgrade" of the GC aswell, except it has the "wiimote". So that's what you call it now. infact, compared to a PS3, the wii isn't even a good upgrade. the hardware specs aren't even close to even the 360! |
Dude, have you even been reading this thread or the Wii Website!
Interactive gaming system! Move the controller to the right to make the character move to the right!
And Who the Hell even cares if it has Dual Core WhoopDeeCrap, I dont care what the GFX looks like! I just use it to play Games, and have a good time!
And, as a developer, Developers LOVE the Wii, you see, Console Companys have this thing to make Games work on their consoles.
The PS3 Consoles Program costs $20000
The Wii: $1000
A few things i have herd from a couple of computer engineers suggests that the the PS3's extreme power is not for all the gaming power but to power to the blu ray technology.
Now I'm not a huge expert in this subject so I'm pretty much just the messenger but i look at the the graphics comparison between the xbox360 and PS3 and i dont feel that PS3 blows Xbox360 out of the water. 
The console is new to me, not too popular on our country.
Wii will come soon and so interesting. 
| LostOverThere wrote: |
Dude, have you even been reading this thread or the Wii Website!
Interactive gaming system! Move the controller to the right to make the character move to the right! |
So does the ps3's "SixAxis"(the new controller), so what's your point? That's just a hardware UPDATE.
| Firebolt wrote: |
| A few things i have herd from a couple of computer engineers suggests that the the PS3's extreme power is not for all the gaming power but to power to the blu ray technology. |
Uhm, to answer this very logically; does a computer need higher level hardware to run a DVD-Rom? no. The so-called "Blu-ray technology" is just a disc reader in the system that simply reads blu-ray discs, amongst various other things.
So in other words; the might of the ps3 does not need to power the blu-ray rom.
| eLto wrote: |
| The Wii is "simply an upgrade" of the GC aswell, except it has the "wiimote". So that's what you call it now. infact, compared to a PS3, the wii isn't even a good upgrade. the hardware specs aren't even close to even the 360! |
Hardware specs aren't the only thing that matter. What good is great hardware if the games are lousy. Super Mario Bros 1, 3, Super Mario 64, The Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time didn't have very good graphics and the music was midi in Mario 64 and Zelda. Graphically they look very bad now, but they were the best sellers of their time and are still played with a really happy mind. They are great though they don't have such great graphics.
People now a days care only for the specs and graphics, not for the games. A good game is a game which you enjoy playing and want to play it as soon as you can. The quality of games are becoming bad because we only care about the power and ablities of the consoles and not the actual games!
| Firebolt wrote: |
A few things i have herd from a couple of computer engineers suggests that the the PS3's extreme power is not for all the gaming power but to power to the blu ray technology.
Now I'm not a huge expert in this subject so I'm pretty much just the messenger but i look at the the graphics comparison between the xbox360 and PS3 and i dont feel that PS3 blows Xbox360 out of the water.  |
Well there's a simple answer for that, when you compare the graphics side by side, you will not be able to see a difference (unless you're a Gfx dweeb) as there is a limit to nowadays graphics. Remember when Final Fantasy VII's graphics was all cool? And then Square Enix proved it could do better with the hardware in the Playstation with Final Fantasy VIII and IX? It just means though they look the same now, the 360's limit will be reached first before the PS3's. I do admit though, I don't care about graphics too much, I care more about gameplay. Thus I'm hoping Square Enix brings some real Final Fantasy games to the Wii. Yes... I do know Sony holds a lot of stock in Square Enix, but so does Nintendo.
| eLto wrote: |
| LostOverThere wrote: | Dude, have you even been reading this thread or the Wii Website!
Interactive gaming system! Move the controller to the right to make the character move to the right! |
So does the ps3's "SixAxis"(the new controller), so what's your point? That's just a hardware UPDATE.
| Firebolt wrote: | | A few things i have herd from a couple of computer engineers suggests that the the PS3's extreme power is not for all the gaming power but to power to the blu ray technology. |
Uhm, to answer this very logically; does a computer need higher level hardware to run a DVD-Rom? no. The so-called "Blu-ray technology" is just a disc reader in the system that simply reads blu-ray discs, amongst various other things.
So in other words; the might of the ps3 does not need to power the blu-ray rom. |
Yes this six-axis rip-off is great... I mean the six-axis controller is nice... eh... whatever. The point is in terms of it being able to sense motion, it is quite inferior to the Wii's remote. This is not debatable, and if you want to debate it, you already said you're a Sony fanboy and debating with you about it would be meaningless.
Well you might be right about the Blu-ray thing. However have you thought about it? The Blu-ray is a new piece of equipment. And the reason DVD-rom don't need "higher level hardware" is because it is built-in the DVD-rom itself. Surprised? Check your computer, you can take out the DVD-rom and it will be in a rectangular box that has hardware in it. Amazing, I know. And can Pentium 1 computers use DVD-rom? No, huh? I guess that means higher-level hardware is needed to power certain things like DVD-roms or Blu-ray readers. Of course, I could just be totally wrong. I do that sometimes.
Funny you should say that, and you do seem to prove a point, exept, I've seen a DVD rom actually functioning on a pentium 1. The only problem with that was that the pentium 1 was too old to run Win98, which had all the necessary drivers.
I also know debating is pointless, since I'm a sony fanboy, but I'm not as partial as you might think. I've played my share of nintendo games. Mario? all of them, except spin-offs like paper mario and mario tennis. Zelda? I actually bought a gamecube 3 years ago just so I could play Windwaker and Ocarina of time again. I sold it when I was done with them, but I'm just proving that I'm also open for nintendo. What I want to prove to you guys(which some of you are a bit too persistent to realize) is that the possibilites on the ps3 is better than eny of the other two next gen consoles. The Wii will never measure up to the ps3 graphic-wise, and the 360 will never be as fun as the wii, since it has no hardware extras like the ps3 and wii.
I'm not THAT partial to sony, but the 360 is definetily the worst of the three next-gen consoles, but wii is the lesser in power. That's all I'm trying to tell you, and all I'm trying to prove.
Can you admit I'm right now? 
Well i have noticed that everyone seems to ignore the Wii, like in a gaming mag they reviewed the 360 the PS3 but not the Wii, guess games that have gameplay instead of great graphics are rare and unpopular now...
i noticed you used ps3 motion sensor and ergonomic design controller.
1, its a rip of the Wii
2, the wii is based on a freakin TV remote, whats more ergonomic thant that?
dumbass
| eLto wrote: |
Funny you should say that, and you do seem to prove a point, exept, I've seen a DVD rom actually functioning on a pentium 1. The only problem with that was that the pentium 1 was too old to run Win98, which had all the necessary drivers.
I also know debating is pointless, since I'm a sony fanboy, but I'm not as partial as you might think. I've played my share of nintendo games. Mario? all of them, except spin-offs like paper mario and mario tennis. Zelda? I actually bought a gamecube 3 years ago just so I could play Windwaker and Ocarina of time again. I sold it when I was done with them, but I'm just proving that I'm also open for nintendo. What I want to prove to you guys(which some of you are a bit too persistent to realize) is that the possibilites on the ps3 is better than eny of the other two next gen consoles. The Wii will never measure up to the ps3 graphic-wise, and the 360 will never be as fun as the wii, since it has no hardware extras like the ps3 and wii.
I'm not THAT partial to sony, but the 360 is definetily the worst of the three next-gen consoles, but wii is the lesser in power. That's all I'm trying to tell you, and all I'm trying to prove.
Can you admit I'm right now?  |
Hey, I've never ever said that the Wii can compete with the PS3 graphics-wise. I'm not a fanboy of any one console, but it's too easy when people want to compare pure graphics as I believe it is the gameplay that is important, not the graphics. Yes, it's a nice bonus and yes there must be a standard for graphics, but unless Nintendo has reverted to pure 2-D 32-bit graphics, I'm pretty fine with the Wii.
As of now, I still say the 360 and the PS3 are about the same with PS3 having better chances of having a better variety of games. However Halo 3 must be noted and Bill Gates threw money at former Final Fantasy series developer to receive Blue Dragon.
Basically:
Sony has Square Enix (via saving them from The Spirits Within) and hot games like Metal Gear Solid 4 with the power and graphics to back it up.
Microsoft has money to throw at people to get companies on their side (Rare first, now getting Blue Dragon) with power and nice graphics.
Nintendo has innovation and fanfavorite games (Zelda, Mario, Super Smash Bros.) with the ability not to overheat and cause a total meltdown.
Still skeptical about the PS3's cooling system.
| Whong wrote: |
| Kelcey wrote: | | So you need "something totally different," otherwise you won't buy it? Could you (if you have a cube + n64) explain to me why you have a gamecube and games that don't use innovative controllers? The gamecube was just an upgrade from the N64. But did you buy it? If you did buy a cube, then you're stating there's no problem buying something that's "just an upgrade" over the previous system. |
At that time there was nothing more innovative, but now that there is I wouldn't like to just spend almost 2.5 times more money for only an upgrade. Wii is cheap, but really good still. You of course can buy a PS3, but most here want a Wii, because we need something different and new! |
So are you saying if Sony released a Wii back when the cube was around, you wouldn't have purchased a gamecube knowing that Zelda, Metroid, Mario, and Starfox would be on it?
| QrafTee wrote: |
Alright, so let's run down the list:
2. Cell CPU, impressive indeed. It's a powerful chip, but will it be used to its fullest potential? Perhaps... perhaps not. And if it does, what's keeping the PS3 from total meltdown? More power = More heat. Funny how we don't get a spec of it's cooling system.
|
Yeah Sony is dumb as heck, but I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that developers will be able to use all of the Cell's power.
| QrafTee wrote: |
3. Bluetooth, okay... I don't care.
|
Me neither.
| QrafTee wrote: |
4. Blu-Ray, again impressive. This one is actually one of the big ones of the PS3. However, it would've been better if Sony established a firm ground for the Blu-Ray already (like beating the HD-DVD) then have the PS3 serve as a foundation for the Blu-Ray. I really like the Blu-Ray, so I hope Sony doesn't screw it up like it did the UMD... then again I didn't like the UMD or PSP to begin with...
|
Hopefully for those that get a PS3, blu-ray doesn't die. However, if it does, it's still there for storage (don't wanna argue about that). Whether or not that is gonna be important is YET to be seen.
| QrafTee wrote: |
5. Hard drive... my computer has one. Whoopdeedoo...
|
I personally love the hard drive. Use it for caching to make games load faster. Not have to worry about a bloody memory card and I can save games all I want without having to worry. As far as content goes... storing demos so I can test out the games is great. I don't care for trailers and what not though. In my opinion, MS did a great thing introducing hard drives to consoles.
| QrafTee wrote: |
7. Memory slots for various types of media? Like what? I am a gamer and I only need to get what I need for gaming. I don't need a 12-in-1 media card reader or whatever the hell the PS3 has in it. Flash drive, okay, that's understandable, USB, obviously. Other crap, that's just more reason to take money from me.
|
Yup, don't like the memory slots either.
| QrafTee wrote: |
9. I can care less. How am I on this forum? I have a COMPUTER! That's how! I can play all those media. And they're basically the same type of media, they've audio/video files. Get a grip and don't make it look like it's more than it is.
|
Same here, don't care about media other than demos (so I can test the game out before I buy it.)
| eLto wrote: |
Funny you should say that, and you do seem to prove a point, exept, I've seen a DVD rom actually functioning on a pentium 1. The only problem with that was that the pentium 1 was too old to run Win98, which had all the necessary drivers.
I also know debating is pointless, since I'm a sony fanboy, but I'm not as partial as you might think. I've played my share of nintendo games. Mario? all of them, except spin-offs like paper mario and mario tennis. Zelda? I actually bought a gamecube 3 years ago just so I could play Windwaker and Ocarina of time again. I sold it when I was done with them, but I'm just proving that I'm also open for nintendo. What I want to prove to you guys(which some of you are a bit too persistent to realize) is that the possibilites on the ps3 is better than eny of the other two next gen consoles. The Wii will never measure up to the ps3 graphic-wise, and the 360 will never be as fun as the wii, since it has no hardware extras like the ps3 and wii.
I'm not THAT partial to sony, but the 360 is definetily the worst of the three next-gen consoles, but wii is the lesser in power. That's all I'm trying to tell you, and all I'm trying to prove.
Can you admit I'm right now?  |
Well it's all about the games and NOT the hardware. For the Nintendo fans, that includes the Wiimote. Just because the PS3 is a power monster DOESN'T mean we're gonna get amazing looking games sprinkling down upon us 24/7. There are plenty of sub par ps3 games out there already. As far as the Wii is concerned, don't think that every game is instantly the funnest game you've ever played just because of the controller. Nothing is given in this generation so debating about the hardware doesn't tell anyone which system is "better." A system is better for an individual based on what the individual likes. You could have the PS3 power + Wii controller with Final Fantasy/Mario/Zelda/GTA and every other franchise out there. But if the person likes Halo and hates all the other franchises, why should that person bother with that type of system if what HE/SHE likes is on a different system?
Well I'm a Nintendo fan and will most probably never buy anything else.
The hardware on the Wii is enough for me, since I don't really care about the graphics.
Nintendo Wii is coming soon!
Virtual Console is what sells the Wii to me. Of course I would've bought one because of the price, the plethora of awesome multiplayer games, and the newness of it just because I have to have everything new, but add all of that to SNES, NES, Genesis, etc games? Psh. I'm there.
| evanc88 wrote: |
| Virtual Console is what sells the Wii to me. Of course I would've bought one because of the price, the plethora of awesome multiplayer games, and the newness of it just because I have to have everything new, but add all of that to SNES, NES, Genesis, etc games? Psh. I'm there. |
Yep, those points make Wii an excellent console and that that it is so cheap!
PS3 and Xbox 360 are great consoles too, but the price is a thing that makes them not so easily buyable! 
Wii
I have some information.
WII Console will be sold in UK at £180.
"So committed is it to not entering to a specs battle with Sony and Microsoft that Nintendo will simply not reveal the exact nature of the technology sitting beneath Wii's refined off-white exterior, stating only that CPU, codenamed 'Broadway', is a PowerPC-based unit 'Joint-Engineered' with IBM, and that the GPU is an Ati-Designed solution.
It is keen, however, to play up the platform's 512MB of internal flash memory, used for Virtual Console downloads, etc. Additional memory can be added by simply using SD cards, although Nintendo has yet to confirm whether Wii will be compatible with the SD-HC (High Capacity) format, which currently tops out at 8GB. Regardless, 2GB SD cards at around £40 each will surely prove popular options.
Externally, the Wii hardware features a standard Ninteno-style AV-out port, running to component (supporting up to 480p), composite or S-video; two standard USB 2.0 ports; an SD flash memory card slot; two GameCube memory card slots; and four GameCube controller ports (also compatible with WaveBird controllers). The facisa, meanwhile, features three buttons (Power, Reset, Eject) and a flap, which covers the SD card, memory card and joypad ports (the USB 2.0 ports are situaed at the console's rear).
In terms of connectivity, the Wii console will communicate via Wi-Fi to DS units (for downloading game demos and other content, and possibly for messaging in the future), and can be routed to internet via a USB 2.0 LAN adapter if a Wi-Fi network is unavailable.
Standing just 157mm wide, 215.4mm tall and 44mm thick, Wii is small enough to fit into even the most cluttered AV setups, although it gains stature when placed in its stand, which comes packed into every box. The slightly ghostly blue which emanates from its disc slot, meanwhile, ensures it a vibe unlike any other game console's.
Remote
(One packed in; Additional Unit: £30)
The primary method of Wii input links to the console via a Bluetooth connection with the sensor bar, and can be used at a range of up to ten metres (effective for five metres with applications that use pointing inputs), with up to four in use simulaneously. User preferences, including Wii Mii avatars, can be saved to 6KB of onboard memory. Power is supplied via two AA batteries, and although Nintendo estimates 60 hours' use in simple accelerometer-based games, this will drop significantly with more intensive applications and when used in conjunction with the Nunchuk add-on. The unit's underside features a trigger-style 'B' button and also a 'sync' button, serving to tie multiple controller inputs to their respective players. The Remot also features built-in rumble and a small onboard speaker.
Nunchuk
(One packed in; Additional Unit: £15)
Connecting to the Remote via a short cable (it cannot be used solely on its own), the Nunchuk also features accelerometer technology or motion-based input. Of more obvious use is its analogue joystick, whose design is modelled on Nintendo's GameCube controller template. The Nunchuk's underside features two buttons, 'C' and 'Z', the latter fashioned in a more obvious trigger shape than the Remote's 'B' button.
Because it does not require batteries, the Nunchuk feels unusually light in operation, although the inclusion of a rumble facility ensures that it has a tactile quality.
Classic Controller
(£15)
Available seperately at launch, the Classic Controller is essentially a hybrid of Nintendo's SNES and GameCube joypads - Whichit has to be, since it is intended as a catch-all device for Virtual Console NES, SNES, N64, Mega Drive and Turbo Grafx games (and, concievably, independently produced releases). Smaller than you'd expect (at 65.7mm x 135.7mm x 26mm), along with 'X', 'Y', 'A' and 'B' face buttons it features 'L' and 'R' shoulder buttons, plus 'Z1' and 'Z2'. Between these, a further button opens slots on the joypad's rear, although the purpose of these apertures remains unclear at the time of writing. Like the Nunchuk, the Classic Controller must be connected to a Remote via a cable.
Sensor Bar
Placed on or around your television (either above or below the screen - it can be placed in its own cradle), the sensor bar handles Remote input via a reciever at each end. Approximately 200mm wide, it is unobtrusive, and styled to look as innocuous as possible. At the heart of the Wii experience, its reliability in tests is proven, although it is reported to be sensitive to strong halogen lights situated either directly above or below, which can interfere with its performance.
Credits
Edge Magazine
(For the information above)
Me
(For typing it)
I took a whole section of a certain part of the magazine, this is ACCURATE information. I hope this information helps you decides if you want to get it or not.
Don't ask me questions...
you people keep answering my questions with more questions. I admit that the wii probably will be funny, if you like it. All I want, is for one of you damned nintendo fanboys to ADMIT that the nintendo will be the lesser console, as opposed to what GameCube was/is. The gamecube is infact better than the ps2, graphics wise.
so all I want is a yes from one of you guys.
well, ill wait to see if its something for me if the local stores here gets it as a demo, i really like the idea of the new control, sounds really really cool, but i can imagine a long row of people standing infront of the test monitor with it connected, flapping their hands round like idiots 
Really waiting for Wii. Have seen some screen shot of Zelda game and it looks really good. The most interesting is if wii will be a success is what gone happened next generation if xbox and ps will get gyro controlls. That's will be cool
It seems that at time goes on, Microsoft and Sony both seem to be trying to label suped up computers as video game systems sporting their own custom Operating System and controller ports... Games like theirs can be played for similar money on a computer and still have all the functionality of a Computer and not just what someone decided to slap on a console...
Everyone else is always playing catchup when it comes to controller design. Supeer Nintedo came out with 6 buttons, Genesis followed suit. N64 came out with the analog stick. Playstation copies it. And Now the WII controller is being copied again now by ps3. Innovative designs, which I stick with my nintendo systems.
i cant wait until the wii's launch... a couple of weeks 
| enygmasoft wrote: |
| Everyone else is always playing catchup when it comes to controller design. Supeer Nintedo came out with 6 buttons, Genesis followed suit. N64 came out with the analog stick. Playstation copies it. And Now the WII controller is being copied again now by ps3. Innovative designs, which I stick with my nintendo systems. |
Well this is how it goes: Nintendo copied Atari, but Atari went further ahead of its time and died.
This is how Nintendo thinks, "What can we do to make gaming better, but not make it so improbable to use as a gaming controller?"
This is why they slowly worked in shoulder buttons. Then rumble feature, then wireless, and then finally motion sensor.
Now they aren't the first people who've tried these things, but they've been the most successful in making it work and making people want it, anyone can argue this, but then they'd be wrong fanboys.
What's next? A Nintendo controller with fans? It's been done, but it isn't popular. I doubt it though because Nintendo works to try to make gaming feel better rather than things like fans, then again Nintendo is as predictable as a boy hitting puberty.
| enygmasoft wrote: |
| Everyone else is always playing catchup when it comes to controller design. Supeer Nintedo came out with 6 buttons, Genesis followed suit. N64 came out with the analog stick. Playstation copies it. And Now the WII controller is being copied again now by ps3. Innovative designs, which I stick with my nintendo systems. |
Sony didn't just copy the analog stick and rumble, they made them better.
Who came up with the idea of TWO analog sticks? Sony, and they also made the rumble implimented into controllers so you didn't have to buy loads of batteries.
That's true, the analog stick on the N64 controllers got broken pretty fast. My PSOne controllers still work, and they're 8 years old.
lol^ u right about the control , but i like the feature of download old nes games i want double dragon 2 and mario 3
yes- i have pre orderd my Wii
no- i will not be seen for about a week after i get it
yes- i will buy a mini lava lamp to plug into one of its usb ports
| eLto wrote: |
| That's true, the analog stick on the N64 controllers got broken pretty fast. My PSOne controllers still work, and they're 8 years old. |
My N64 controlers analog stick work very well even now and it is 9 years old!


And GameCube controlers too, and they are 4-5 years old!
like eric cartman on south park 10x12 episode... i really want it! i'm a big nintendo fan since 18years ago... and a new nintendo hardware is for me always a big event!
| sfauzia wrote: |
| like eric cartman on south park 10x12 episode... i really want it! i'm a big nintendo fan since 18years ago... and a new nintendo hardware is for me always a big event! |
haha, cartman... him and butters make the show. that episode was crazy though, i can't believe they were allowed to show some of that stuff!
my opinion on this whole PS3 vs XBOX 360 vs Wii is that the PS3 is pretty much worthless, xbox will come out top, and the wii will do decently. The PS3 costs too much because it includes unnecessary stuff and it isn't upgradable. The xbox is for the people who love FPS and action games, while the wii is action, rpg, and adventure. The ps3 doesn't seem to have like any good games for it, or they are already on a different console.
I have preorded my Wii, and I am looking forward to getting it in a month's time. What i just can't understand is why people get so frustrated arguing about which console is best. Surely it doesn't matter, because they are all great? I think each console has it's own strong point; Xbox360 > Graphics and range of games, PS3 > Blu Ray and excellent graphics, Wii > Interactivity, fun, the ability to get involved with the game.
I also think that Nintendo are doing their best to stand out from the crowd as the gaming company that is most interested in the experience that gamers get when playing on their consoles. The Nintendo DS had the Touch Generations games, which were targetted at people who had never ever played on consoles. The DS itself was meant to bring more interactivity (however limited it may have been) to gaming. All in all, Nintendo are looking at how gamers can get really involved, and I truly think they have broken a barrier with the Wii. I can't wait to get mine!
I can't wait for the Wii! That and the DS will combine to make a great generation of gaming. I have already purchased a 360 for my powerhouse, so now I will sit back and enjoy the games both companies throw at me. I am jumping off the Sony bandwagon, at least for a little while. What Sony just did disgusts me. If you haven't read, go to www.lik-sang.com. I don't know if any of you ever purchased something from this site, but they were great. It was a sad thing to see them go.
| eLto wrote: |
you people keep answering my questions with more questions. I admit that the wii probably will be funny, if you like it. All I want, is for one of you damned nintendo fanboys to ADMIT that the nintendo will be the lesser console, as opposed to what GameCube was/is. The gamecube is infact better than the ps2, graphics wise.
so all I want is a yes from one of you guys. |
The Gamecube is in fact better than the PS2, graphics-wise. Then why did the PS2 far outsell the Gamecube? You are saying that a console's success is based on its graphical power. Incorrect. The PS2 beat the Gamecube, yet its graphics were less powerful than the Gamecube's.
The Wii will certainly not be the lesser console. Third-party support is overwhelming it seems. Square Enix is in fact making games for Nintendo again: new Final on both the Wii and DS, among other things. Perhaps you should watch this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wzmf0ChL24
There. The PS3 has only 4 controller ports, just like the Wii. And the Gamecube. And the XBox. Get your facts right.
"No gimmicks"? What about this?
http://digitalbattle.com/2006/05/09/e3-sony-steals-from-nintendo/
Oh, and back to the lies, let's see this:
"There is no change in our original plan to release the console in spring 2006," - SCE spokesperson Kei Sakaguchi - Feb 2006
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=14821
http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=62956
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/01/24/no_sony_ps3_uk_2007/
Whoops.
I'm definently looking towards the Wii.
It's cheap and innovative and is backed by tons of 3rd party support(what the GC lacked) and has online support(GC also lacked).
Personally the PS3 is "OK". I don't care about Bluray or about the most impressive graphics. I care more about the style of the graphics. For example take WoW and compare it to EQ2. EQ2 dominates it in polygon rates but WoW just has this neat atmosphere and style that draws you in.
Graphics don't mean anything. All that matters is the quality of the games. The Wii allows for a new quality of games. That doesn't always mean better, but there are many games that damn will be better. I can't wait for a neat star wars game for the Wii.
i will buy a Wii coz i just cant afford PS3
Nintendo is always first in realizing what the gaming market needs. for one thing, when was the last time a game was innovative, not for graphics, but for gameplay. I can say I had more fun playing galaxian, than I did playing halo. There is major push for developers to create purely icing on the cake experieces. Video games are the new hollywood. Very few games now are inovative gameplay wise. The core no longer matters, for big developers. I'm not about to pretend that the N64 would not have been better served by ad CD-ROM, but the takes massive leaps for Nintendo, because they finally realized us old timers need to be able to keep our collection of game cube games. As terms of hardware specs, it is on the lower rung of the graphics gene pool, but it has enough features to make it a good competitor, regardless.
Definently will be getting a Wii, my first console since my N64 and Ps1. It's just something new and out there. Thats what I like about it! It isn't the same old thing that makes games slightly better. It's fresh, new, and innovative.
| enygmasoft wrote: |
| Nintendo is always first in realizing what the gaming market needs. for one thing, when was the last time a game was innovative, not for graphics, but for gameplay. I can say I had more fun playing galaxian, than I did playing halo. There is major push for developers to create purely icing on the cake experieces. Video games are the new hollywood. Very few games now are inovative gameplay wise. The core no longer matters, for big developers. I'm not about to pretend that the N64 would not have been better served by ad CD-ROM, but the takes massive leaps for Nintendo, because they finally realized us old timers need to be able to keep our collection of game cube games. As terms of hardware specs, it is on the lower rung of the graphics gene pool, but it has enough features to make it a good competitor, regardless. |
Yes Nintendo knows exactly how to get new gamers interested. Wii is an ideal console for everyone because it is made for everyone! It isn't for kids just, everyone can enjoy it. WiiConnect24 is a great feature, just imagine playing Super Smash Bros Brawl online, how cool is that! It is a really cool thing and the connectivity between Wii and DS is also a great thing.
And Wii doesn't cost much, which gives it the advantage in the market!


Want something different? Choose Wii!

| Whong wrote: |
| enygmasoft wrote: | | Nintendo is always first in realizing what the gaming market needs. for one thing, when was the last time a game was innovative, not for graphics, but for gameplay. I can say I had more fun playing galaxian, than I did playing halo. There is major push for developers to create purely icing on the cake experieces. Video games are the new hollywood. Very few games now are inovative gameplay wise. The core no longer matters, for big developers. I'm not about to pretend that the N64 would not have been better served by ad CD-ROM, but the takes massive leaps for Nintendo, because they finally realized us old timers need to be able to keep our collection of game cube games. As terms of hardware specs, it is on the lower rung of the graphics gene pool, but it has enough features to make it a good competitor, regardless. |
Yes Nintendo knows exactly how to get new gamers interested. Wii is an ideal console for everyone because it is made for everyone! It isn't for kids just, everyone can enjoy it. WiiConnect24 is a great feature, just imagine playing Super Smash Bros Brawl online, how cool is that! It is a really cool thing and the connectivity between Wii and DS is also a great thing.
And Wii doesn't cost much, which gives it the advantage in the market!  
Want something different? Choose Wii!  |
You know what I am surprised about though? Although it's cool and everything. It says it's for everyone, why haven't they cranked up the advertisements? I mean I saw the PS3 ads on TV and they sucked, but at least they have ads telling everyone "Here I come." Nintendo seriously needs to get the word out, since you know it's a Wii.
| QrafTee wrote: |
| Whong wrote: | | enygmasoft wrote: | | Nintendo is always first in realizing what the gaming market needs. for one thing, when was the last time a game was innovative, not for graphics, but for gameplay. I can say I had more fun playing galaxian, than I did playing halo. There is major push for developers to create purely icing on the cake experieces. Video games are the new hollywood. Very few games now are inovative gameplay wise. The core no longer matters, for big developers. I'm not about to pretend that the N64 would not have been better served by ad CD-ROM, but the takes massive leaps for Nintendo, because they finally realized us old timers need to be able to keep our collection of game cube games. As terms of hardware specs, it is on the lower rung of the graphics gene pool, but it has enough features to make it a good competitor, regardless. |
Yes Nintendo knows exactly how to get new gamers interested. Wii is an ideal console for everyone because it is made for everyone! It isn't for kids just, everyone can enjoy it. WiiConnect24 is a great feature, just imagine playing Super Smash Bros Brawl online, how cool is that! It is a really cool thing and the connectivity between Wii and DS is also a great thing.
And Wii doesn't cost much, which gives it the advantage in the market!  
Want something different? Choose Wii!  |
You know what I am surprised about though? Although it's cool and everything. It says it's for everyone, why haven't they cranked up the advertisements? I mean I saw the PS3 ads on TV and they sucked, but at least they have ads telling everyone "Here I come." Nintendo seriously needs to get the word out, since you know it's a Wii. |
I agree. Nintendo has the potential to emerge as the big winner in the 7th generation of consoles. But they really need to work on their advertisements. The content they have on their website is great. They should put up advertisements with the same content. That would really help out their sales. I've seen a lot of DS commercials, and they've helped Nintendo out significantly. Though, I actually haven't seen any PS3 commercials, either. I know there are PS3 commercials, I've just never seen them.
The Wii is definitely the most revolutionary of the latest consoles in terms of user interactiveness. I think it will be a huge hit, and the beginning of a better gaming experience! This will definitely put Nintendo back on the map in the world of gaming. Now all they need are better game titles to match the potentials of the Wii console.
| william wrote: |
| QrafTee wrote: |
You know what I am surprised about though? Although it's cool and everything. It says it's for everyone, why haven't they cranked up the advertisements? I mean I saw the PS3 ads on TV and they sucked, but at least they have ads telling everyone "Here I come." Nintendo seriously needs to get the word out, since you know it's a Wii. |
I agree. Nintendo has the potential to emerge as the big winner in the 7th generation of consoles. But they really need to work on their advertisements. The content they have on their website is great. They should put up advertisements with the same content. That would really help out their sales. I've seen a lot of DS commercials, and they've helped Nintendo out significantly. Though, I actually haven't seen any PS3 commercials, either. I know there are PS3 commercials, I've just never seen them. |
They are weird commercials, the PS3 ones. One features one of those colored puzzle cubes which floats in the air and solves itself. Suddenly, it explodes and covers the wall with colors. The other one features a baby doll facing a PS3 and then it starts to float, show emotions, and then cry. Yeah... I don't get any of that at all.
| QrafTee wrote: |
| william wrote: | | QrafTee wrote: |
You know what I am surprised about though? Although it's cool and everything. It says it's for everyone, why haven't they cranked up the advertisements? I mean I saw the PS3 ads on TV and they sucked, but at least they have ads telling everyone "Here I come." Nintendo seriously needs to get the word out, since you know it's a Wii. |
I agree. Nintendo has the potential to emerge as the big winner in the 7th generation of consoles. But they really need to work on their advertisements. The content they have on their website is great. They should put up advertisements with the same content. That would really help out their sales. I've seen a lot of DS commercials, and they've helped Nintendo out significantly. Though, I actually haven't seen any PS3 commercials, either. I know there are PS3 commercials, I've just never seen them. |
They are weird commercials, the PS3 ones. One features one of those colored puzzle cubes which floats in the air and solves itself. Suddenly, it explodes and covers the wall with colors. The other one features a baby doll facing a PS3 and then it starts to float, show emotions, and then cry. Yeah... I don't get any of that at all. |
The rubik's cube one was to show the "power" of the Cell. Solving the Rubik's cube for a processor could take a bit of time... but the Cell did it fast (in the commercial).
The baby one... I'm with you, I have no clue. Personally I think the rubik's cube one was pretty cool. The rest have sucked, haha.
| Kelcey wrote: |
| QrafTee wrote: | | william wrote: | | QrafTee wrote: |
You know what I am surprised about though? Although it's cool and everything. It says it's for everyone, why haven't they cranked up the advertisements? I mean I saw the PS3 ads on TV and they sucked, but at least they have ads telling everyone "Here I come." Nintendo seriously needs to get the word out, since you know it's a Wii. |
I agree. Nintendo has the potential to emerge as the big winner in the 7th generation of consoles. But they really need to work on their advertisements. The content they have on their website is great. They should put up advertisements with the same content. That would really help out their sales. I've seen a lot of DS commercials, and they've helped Nintendo out significantly. Though, I actually haven't seen any PS3 commercials, either. I know there are PS3 commercials, I've just never seen them. |
They are weird commercials, the PS3 ones. One features one of those colored puzzle cubes which floats in the air and solves itself. Suddenly, it explodes and covers the wall with colors. The other one features a baby doll facing a PS3 and then it starts to float, show emotions, and then cry. Yeah... I don't get any of that at all. |
The rubik's cube one was to show the "power" of the Cell. Solving the Rubik's cube for a processor could take a bit of time... but the Cell did it fast (in the commercial).
The baby one... I'm with you, I have no clue. Personally I think the rubik's cube one was pretty cool. The rest have sucked, haha. |
Shouldn't this be about Wii and not PS3?

The main problems is that one might get a little tired in the arm... otherwise the Wii is definatly the most promising console this generation man cant wait for the new Zelda, and im not a Nintendo fanboy I never owned a gamecube however just the taught of the before-parties with alchol and a Wii gives me a hardon lol ^^
| madcaps wrote: |
| The main problems is that one might get a little tired in the arm... otherwise the Wii is definatly the most promising console this generation man cant wait for the new Zelda, and im not a Nintendo fanboy I never owned a gamecube however just the taught of the before-parties with alchol and a Wii gives me a hardon lol ^^ |
Well if one gets tired in the arm we will know one thing, the players will be burning more calories, that must make the Democrats and California's Governator very happy y'know because of the obesity thing going on. I think one who plays the Wii enough will be conditioned, so it's fine, that's probably why they include Wii Sports in every bundle with the exception of Japan (no obesity there guys).
Good lord, I can't wait for the Wii. It should be pretty awesome. I think I am gong to get Zelda TP and Metal Slug Anthology to start me off. Who knows what I might get for Christmas (That is if I ask for games). I am also interested in Red Steel, Elebits, and Rayman. This holiday season has ALREADY been hard on my wallet, and it is only going to get worse with the Wii launch! Anyone feeling the same?
About Ads, Where I live, Australia, Sony hasnt even started to advertise, but Nintendo has.
The ads are pretty funny, and really get you to know about the Wii.
It's very unfortunate. I'm going to Spain and Italy in June and because of that I don't think I'm going to be able to pick up a Wii. I was looking forward to playing Metal Slug Anthology, Rayman, Wii Sports and World Series of Poker. The thing I'm still most excited about, however, are the Virtual Console games. I can hardly wait to see what "new" games get released every month. It'll be exciting and nostalgiac, for sure.
Just saw a Wii demo unit at EB Games. It was cool. BTW, the guy at the counter said that preorders of the Wii are WAAAY higher than pre-orders for PS3 or sales for Xbox360. Nintendo for the win!
I'll be purchasing the Wii, with a regular controller, Madden '07, and the online package, and I'll be set.
I'll never pay 300.00+ for a console.
| Studio Madcrow wrote: |
| Just saw a Wii demo unit at EB Games. It was cool. BTW, the guy at the counter said that preorders of the Wii are WAAAY higher than pre-orders for PS3 or sales for Xbox360. Nintendo for the win! |
Uhh... dude, I hate to tell you this, but of course the Wii pre-orders are more than the PS3 pre-orders, Nintendo has around 4 million units or so and Sony has around 400,000 - 1 million units. (Around 1 million by the end of the year) This is worldwide of course.
Don't test my belief. If I want to believe that Nintendo will pwn Sony and M$ in the console wars let me believe it. At least for now anyway...
| QrafTee wrote: |
| madcaps wrote: | | The main problems is that one might get a little tired in the arm... otherwise the Wii is definatly the most promising console this generation man cant wait for the new Zelda, and im not a Nintendo fanboy I never owned a gamecube however just the taught of the before-parties with alchol and a Wii gives me a hardon lol ^^ |
Well if one gets tired in the arm we will know one thing, the players will be burning more calories, that must make the Democrats and California's Governator very happy y'know because of the obesity thing going on. I think one who plays the Wii enough will be conditioned, so it's fine, that's probably why they include Wii Sports in every bundle with the exception of Japan (no obesity there guys). |
You'll get some exercise while you play, now isn't that just great! It won't be so stressing for the neck and shoulders when you get to actually move your hands a bit!
Soon it is here, just can't wait!
I have heard about the Wii. It's pretty cool that you actully have to move your arms instead of some small buttons.
WII its here soon man i cant w8 im itching allover.... 
For anyone that was able to get a Wii, congrats.
As many other people I'm waiting for later shipments because I'm not that big of a fan to stand in lines.
Anyways, I was wondering, The Wii says that it can connect with Wireless and with a adapter.
My two questions are,
1. when they say wireless does that include 802.1x?
2. If not for 1, then does the adapter come with the base system?
2b. If it doesn't come with the base system, then how much does it cost?
Over all, I think I'm going to get the Wii at some point and make the networking work one way or another but it would be nice to know the answers ahead of time.
-Saber
@Saber
1. Yes, the Wii supports 802.11b/g.
2. The adapter is a USB to Ethernet adaptor. It allows wired internet access. Wireless access (802.11) is built right into the console. I'm not sure how much the adapter costs, but there really is no point to buy it when you have Wi-Fi built in.
@william
Thanks for the information, When reading about it, it didn't make it clear if it did 802.11, so thanks for clearing that up.
Now I just have to figure out how to spend money that I dont have yet to get one..
-saber
I got my Wii and its great.
I believe one day, Nintendo can evolve the controller to the point that is as fluid and easy as moving a mouse so pc/console games are essentially interchangable in gameplay.
Got to play with a Wii this weekend, and I have to say I was quite impressed. Despite the lack of the hardware the 360 and PS3 have, the controller design and overall software of the console is enough for this one to be the first of the nex-gen consoles I'm going to buy.
I just played the Wii today with my friends. 5 of us, 2 controllers, but Wii Sports was the only multiplayer game he had (the owner). I had fun and I can say confidently, I'm going to get a Wii and an extra controller. But my friends will have to get their own if they want to play. It's expensive. Haha. Making Miis are fun by the way.
So the Internet connection, you cant just plug it in?
Damn. I don't have any WiFi in my house..
| Loghete wrote: |
So the Internet connection, you cant just plug it in?
Damn. I don't have any WiFi in my house.. |
If you have wireless access, then your Wii should be able to connect to the internet, if not then you need to buy an adapter so the Wii can connect via ethernet. I already have a wireless router so I'm covered when I do get this console.
@QrafTee
If I read right its not that you can plug in the adapter to an either net cable(cat 5) but that its a usb drive that plugs in usb to a windows computer that has a connection. The direct either net to the wii's usb wont be out untill early 2007.
@william
Thanks for the answer before, but I was wondering if you could explain how to connect using 802.1x. There are some other guys in the dorm and are unable to get it working.
-saber
[quote="eLto"]10 reasons why the PS3 beats all you nintendo fanboys:
1 Nvidia RSX GPU.
2 Cell CPU with 8 dual-cores
3 Bluetooth
4 Blu-Ray (54 GB storage space)
5 Hard drive
6 wireless controllers with motion sensibilty, ergonomically shaped
7 Memory slots for various types of media
8 Support for 7 controllers
9 Plays all sorts of media (mp3, wav, avi, mpg etc.)
10 It looks tons cooler
I know you people like nintendo, and don't get me wrong, so did I, until the N64 came out, still using cartridges. Zelda was GREAT, Goldeneye was GREAT, perfect dark was GREAT, and hell, even diddy kong racing was fun, but nintendo seems to always aim for children and new playing styles, whereas sony (and microsuck) aim for the mainstream masses of multimedia, and therefore get way better performing consoles.
Anyway, that's my opinion, and your opinions are yours. Nothing I can do about it.[/quote
I am not agree with what you say...
what you qouted is how such console is awesome.....on the great graphics and the multimedia compatibility only...
Being a gamer I am looking for a good game to play...
A game that values as good is not only how realistics to the graphics are...but also the creativity and the fun we can draw from..
it's quite true that PS3 have impressive displaying and its outlook..but that's all....I have see many passages on the web criticing on its loading time and the problem of overheating...I guess no one would accept an unstable and loading machine to play for.
Moreover, PS3 was definitely a high end product which requires a HDTV and professional sound system to make it works effectively.....I am just query, how many household could afford such professional AV environment at home?...
| Saber wrote: |
@QrafTee
If I read right its not that you can plug in the adapter to an either net cable(cat 5) but that its a usb drive that plugs in usb to a windows computer that has a connection. The direct either net to the wii's usb wont be out untill early 2007.
@william
Thanks for the answer before, but I was wondering if you could explain how to connect using 802.1x. There are some other guys in the dorm and are unable to get it working.
-saber |
I might be incorrect since I've never even touched the Wii, but I'm pretty sure I know how. If you have a wireless connection, here's what you do:
1. Go to connection settings.
2. I think 3 options appear, choose an open connection that says "None."
3. Choose wireless connection.
4. Then, I think, select, "Search for an Access Point."
5. The Wii will search for available connections. Choose the right connection and enter any security information. (If any.)
6. It'll then ask you to save these settings; choose OK.
7. It'll then ask you to run a test, if it works, then the Wii's internet access is set up.
If the last step fails, then, in step 4, try Manual Setup.
Like I said, I might be wrong. The only reason I know this is because I once perused the Wii's manual.
Well I will look through that again, but it might be that the connection here is setup in a way that wont allow it. To be fair, I dont think that supplying wii access to college students is top on their list.
if I cant get that working then I guess I will either have to wait two-ish months for the eithernet to usb direct wii plug or just stoop and get the windows usb wifi adapter for the wii.
Over all Im still some what baffled that nintendo would decide not to include a plug for either net, it cant possible be much more space..
And in the process of figuring this out, Im now wondering if I can reason with my self that spending about $300 is worth playing zelda. It would be nice if the wii was able to play dvds but nope, hopefully that rumor about them thinking about making a new model is true and that I will be able to put off getting one untill that happens.(Or just be depressed when I just suck up and admit that Im waiting for nothing)
oh well, stuff like this happens, maybe I can "steal"(other wise known as borrow) it from the guys down the hall when they go away for weekends, but thats not really worth the time.
Sorry for the rant, Anyways, that manual that you paged through doesn't happen to be online would it?
-saber
Why thank you for linking that,
Ill take a look at it tonight.
-saber
To the guy who asked if it's worth $300 just to play Zelda, in a word: yes. I got my Wii on launch day and have been playing Zelda ever since. A few points:
No, you don't have to move your whole arm, and as a result, no, your arms do not get tired. In fact, I move my wiimote hand more often to aim e.g. my bow than I do to swing my sword -- you can do a spin attack by shaking the nunchuk, and that's a better attack, so I use it most of the time.
Wireless setup is simple, and if you know anything about 802.11 security it's a snap to use. It supports all the major encryption protocols (WEP, WPA, and WPA2) and lets you input passwords, etc. using the on-screen keyboard, which is amazingly not that painful to use. The more you play with it, the easier it is to use the wiimote as a mouse.
The graphics look pretty damn good -- it's not the PS3, but it's about a third as expensive (plus Nintendo makes a tidy profit while Sony takes a huge loss), so you have to adjust your expectations. Also, if you don't have a high-def TV, you're likely to get about as good a picture as you can expect out of this generation.
I'll end my post with a question. Does anybody know when the big N is planning to drop the system update that includes Opera? I'm eager to see how the browser is going to work.
I saw a video of a Wii using its internet capabilities. I'm not sure if its the Opera browser, but I doubt there is anything else. It basically works like a normal browser with your Wii remote as the mouse. Drag, click, whatever you normally do to navigate a page.
Some guy found a way to bypass the Wii's systems to use the browsers capabilities, for this reason he could only surf the web for around 5 minutes or so before his Wii froze.
Mine's been pre-ordered! Time for celebrations!
I live in the UK and it's out in 2 weeks time.
Although I doubt I'll be able to get it on launch day: the queues will be awful!
The Wii has broken all first week sales records in this country... and that's before it's even been released! I reckon that's impressive.
Oh, and Ninty are shipping 4 million consoles into the UK alone by December... that's double what Sony planned.
Omg, I cannot WAIT for the Wii! I really wanna get one. It's just so cool.
Joystiq says Wii sold out in a day, probably over 1 million units. Here's what I think.
| Fire Boar wrote: |
Mine's been pre-ordered! Time for celebrations!
I live in the UK and it's out in 2 weeks time.
Although I doubt I'll be able to get it on launch day: the queues will be awful!
The Wii has broken all first week sales records in this country... and that's before it's even been released! I reckon that's impressive.
Oh, and Ninty are shipping 4 million consoles into the UK alone by December... that's double what Sony planned. |
Hmm, I don't know where you got that data, but I heard Nintendo was planning to get out 4 million consoles by the end of this year worldwide since they've only gotten out a little less than 1 million now... maybe more since I heard shipments are arriving today. And then something about an additional 6 million by 1st quarter '07? I don't remember. Yeah, but Sony totally jipped you guys, I think Europe isn't getting any until '07 .
hmm imho Wii is half next gen. It isnt Super Extra Power like xbox360 and PS3 but im sure that the next gen controler will give lot of fun
I think i will buy it.
| fiorello wrote: |
hmm imho Wii is half next gen. It isn't Super Extra Power like xbox360 and PS3 but im sure that the next gen controller will give lot of fun I think i will buy it. |
I agree that its not fully 'next gen' at least in some ways.
Sure its not able to do anything else other than play Nintendo games(No dvd, no mp3) and sure its not a graphics power house, But when you think about it, when Has Nintendo done that?
In my own limited view, I seem to think that Nintendo and companies that make the games try to make up for "shiny" graphics with game play. Now I'm not saying that this is always true, or that that means that other systems either have good graphics and bad game play, or the other way around. But then again, I don't have a very wide view of games over all, I stick to ones that I like, and watch others play what they like.(money doesn't grow on trees)
For the Wii, correct if I'm wrong, but isn't it about the same size of an older desktop cd drive? Or to put it simpler the smaller of the next gen?
With size, that would limit space for graphics, and what I just cant get my mind past, no either net port.
So, at least in my mind, even that the Wii doesn't have such power from the system, not as good graphics and no hard drive, but the games might make up for it.
-saber
| Saber wrote: |
| fiorello wrote: | hmm imho Wii is half next gen. It isn't Super Extra Power like xbox360 and PS3 but im sure that the next gen controller will give lot of fun I think i will buy it. |
I agree that its not fully 'next gen' at least in some ways.
Sure its not able to do anything else other than play Nintendo games(No dvd, no mp3) and sure its not a graphics power house, But when you think about it, when Has Nintendo done that?
In my own limited view, I seem to think that Nintendo and companies that make the games try to make up for "shiny" graphics with game play. Now I'm not saying that this is always true, or that that means that other systems either have good graphics and bad game play, or the other way around. But then again, I don't have a very wide view of games over all, I stick to ones that I like, and watch others play what they like.(money doesn't grow on trees)
For the Wii, correct if I'm wrong, but isn't it about the same size of an older desktop cd drive? Or to put it simpler the smaller of the next gen?
With size, that would limit space for graphics, and what I just cant get my mind past, no either net port.
So, at least in my mind, even that the Wii doesn't have such power from the system, not as good graphics and no hard drive, but the games might make up for it.
-saber |
Well first, "... means that other systems either have good graphics and bad game play, or the other way around..." Umm... where in the book does it say it can't have both? Wasn't LoZ: OoT a great game? (Graphics and gameplay were great in those days), same with Final Fantasy VII and Tactics. I'm just saying games can have both, and it's not limited to individual consoles.
The Wii is the size of an internal CD-drive for any modern desktop, but it loads like a car's CD player.
And you're right, not having much power can be compensated for its great games. So far though there are only two that I kno