|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cs 1.6 Vs Cs:Source?
I have played both games cs 1.6 and cs:source.
in my opinion Cs:source yes it has good graphics but i dont like the way of aim in this game.i have played cs 1.6 since was avalaible(i played cs 1.3 too) and i prefer the aim in this game, perhaps the years that ive played this game make me refuse cs:source.What are your opinions about this topic?
in my opinion Cs:source yes it has good graphics but i dont like the way of aim in this game.i have played cs 1.6 since was avalaible(i played cs 1.3 too) and i prefer the aim in this game, perhaps the years that ive played this game make me refuse cs:source.What are your opinions about this topic?
You prefer 1.6 "aiming" because you're used to it.
When it comes down to CS:Source vs CS 1.6, it's rather simple in my mind. Each excels at different points. CS 1.6 is better for competitive play in their current states. CS:Source gels with the pub scene better. For casual play with a decent computer, I'd go with CS:Source. For high-end competitive play or spectating, I'd go with 1.6. Of course, this doesn't mean each isn't good at the opposing version's strengths. I've enjoyed competitive play in CS:Source, for instance, and casual play in 1.6 in the past. But since I'm a casual player most of the time, I prefer to play the newer supported version.
When it comes down to CS:Source vs CS 1.6, it's rather simple in my mind. Each excels at different points. CS 1.6 is better for competitive play in their current states. CS:Source gels with the pub scene better. For casual play with a decent computer, I'd go with CS:Source. For high-end competitive play or spectating, I'd go with 1.6. Of course, this doesn't mean each isn't good at the opposing version's strengths. I've enjoyed competitive play in CS:Source, for instance, and casual play in 1.6 in the past. But since I'm a casual player most of the time, I prefer to play the newer supported version.
 |