Suppose the news media is given proof that a Politician is crooked?
For example, if the local newspaper is given proof that an elected official takes kick backs then can the paper stay silent and continue to write articles on that Politician?
And if that Politician buys news time at the TV station then can it be constured that the station and the Politician are in a conspiracy to defruad the Public?
Quid pro quo. The tv station says to the Pol "It is ok for you to defraud the public provided you split the loot with us by buying TV time with the money."
Wouldn't this tend to get the Politician re elected only to have the cycle repeated again?
The key is that the news media has "proof". Can they stay silent and keep the Politician's secret without joining the conspiracy that created the kick back in the first place?
What do you think about this?
For example, if the local newspaper is given proof that an elected official takes kick backs then can the paper stay silent and continue to write articles on that Politician?
And if that Politician buys news time at the TV station then can it be constured that the station and the Politician are in a conspiracy to defruad the Public?
Quid pro quo. The tv station says to the Pol "It is ok for you to defraud the public provided you split the loot with us by buying TV time with the money."
Wouldn't this tend to get the Politician re elected only to have the cycle repeated again?
The key is that the news media has "proof". Can they stay silent and keep the Politician's secret without joining the conspiracy that created the kick back in the first place?
What do you think about this?
