http://www.kurdishaspect.com/doc818106.html
| Quote: |
August 18, 2006
Iran shelling Kurdish villages again
Kurdishaspect.com
Friday August 18, 2006 Kurdishaspect.com - Iranian forces have started firing artillery shells at a camp of Kurdish rebels in Qandil area again, killing two civilians. |
But you wouldn't know that from watching US media. True that, and it's unfortunate too - it will probably go unnoticed by everyone, then if we try to help, the world will turn it's back to us and call us imperalist pigs. Ah well, life's not perfect.
| S3nd K3ys wrote: |
http://www.kurdishaspect.com/doc818106.html
| Quote: | August 18, 2006
Iran shelling Kurdish villages again
Kurdishaspect.com
Friday August 18, 2006 Kurdishaspect.com - Iranian forces have started firing artillery shells at a camp of Kurdish rebels in Qandil area again, killing two civilians. |
But you wouldn't know that from watching US media. |
Iran claims that these " Kurdish rebels " are terrorists that attack Irani civilans and want to destroy Iran. Iran says that it has the right to attack "terrorists" and that those 2 civilians were killed because the terrorists are using them as human shields.
I'm against Iran's logic and action here, what about you? 
| bangala wrote: |
| S3nd K3ys wrote: | http://www.kurdishaspect.com/doc818106.html
| Quote: | August 18, 2006
Iran shelling Kurdish villages again
Kurdishaspect.com
Friday August 18, 2006 Kurdishaspect.com - Iranian forces have started firing artillery shells at a camp of Kurdish rebels in Qandil area again, killing two civilians. |
But you wouldn't know that from watching US media. |
Iran claims that these " Kurdish rebels " are terrorists that attack Irani civilans and want to destroy Iran. Iran says that it has the right to attack "terrorists" and that those 2 civilians were killed because the terrorists are using them as human shields.
I'm against Iran's logic and action here, what about you? |
There's a problem with honesty here, bangalla.
See, YOU are claiming that in a feeble attempt at justification for these attacks, not Iran. And the US really IS fighting terrorists. And Iran really ARE terrorists. 
| Quote: |
August 18, 2006
There's a problem with honesty here, bangalla.
See, YOU are claiming that in a feeble attempt at justification for these attacks, not Iran. And the US really IS fighting terrorists. And Iran really ARE terrorists. |
US ? Who talked about US here? Honestly (it's up to you to believe it) I fully support what the US had done here in Kurdistan. Thanks to this policy, I'm gonna visit my friends in Kurdistan-Iraq next year. It's very safe and beautiful.
Judge me by what I write. I did not mention USA, I've never said that US is not fighting terrorists. Here is what I did say:
| Quote: |
Iran claims that these " Kurdish rebels " are terrorists that attack Irani civilans and want to destroy Iran. Iran says that it has the right to attack "terrorists" and that those 2 civilians were killed because the terrorists are using them as human shields.
I'm against Iran's logic and action here, what about you? |
To clarify things for you, these Kurdish rebels are Iranians who attacked Irani targets and then escaped to Kurdistan in Iraq. Iranian forces followed them and attacked them inside Kurdistan-Iraq. Iran says, if the government of Kurdistan-Iraq cannot take care of these "terrorists", we'll take care of them ourselves.
and I repeat again and I mean exactly what I'm writing, I'm against Iran's logic and action here, what about you?War is stupid. It is the only means that leaders use when they cannot get into an agreement. Some do it for personal pleasure (sadd-m-who?), others do not want to give in for the sake of their country and afraid to lose out! The fact is, by entering into war, both coutries tend to lose out! Casualties are HUMAN beings. What could possibly be worst than using your own countrymen to use their lives in exchange for the leaders' policy?! Strange isin't it? The leaders would rather sacrifice their own men, while they say that they want to protect their own country to Not giving in to he requests of the UN. I'm talking about war in general here, not necessarily about Iran. Though this is true there in some cases! Therefore, leaders compromise their own countrymen, i find it ironic! It is a definite laugh! Wow! Trading peace with the lives of their countrymen! GeEZZ!
Now,do you really know who are the Kurdish terorists?
They are the baby killers!Actually more than 4 Kurdish terorist groups are listed in US's and EU's teror lists...Do you support terorists?They killed more than 30.000 civilian in Turkey and they still continue.So who really supports terrorism You Are or Iran?They also killed lots of people in Iran and if Israel has the right to bomb everywhere for 3 soldiers,Iran and Turkey have the right to bomb Kurdish terorists for more than 50.000 losts...Do you still saying that US should protect them?Look what US will behave like!
Do you still support this baby killers,look their leader's career
I'm not saying that,CNN says that..So please post your comments with knowledge,please don't post without any information! S3nd K3ys! u just making a kind of anti-islam propaganda here ! I don't know what u want to say. But I know that you are just againist muslims and muslims enemies are frends for you. When u r making a genocide in middle east that is too absurd to keep terrorists in Qandil. 
There is a mountain. Not a village or city! Thay r just terrorists. Not the same with you.. Nobody supports terrorism man! If you look closely at what i mentioned earlier, the real deal should be the Iran gov, Kurdhish gov, and maybe US should work together and fight the terrorists, not against the children and the innocent! They bomb each other - that is crazy government at work man! From my personal point of view, every government should help each other out - giving top secret info to other gov, if necessary, and eradicate those terrorists! Isin't that what world peace is about?? Nations big enough such as US are already occupied with so many stuff, but still wants to help Iran and Kurdish! That is great isin't it?? My point is, don't fight the government - help each other and eradicate the terrorists!!
|sigh|
Northern Iran has a large Kurdish population. It's possible Iranian troops were unaware that they were firing into Iraq. Traditionally, the Kurds have been supressed by every country in the region (Turkey, Iraq, Iran). Consider it an accidental incedent. With only 2 deaths, it gets beaten out by the covertly Iranian supplied insurgent forces detonating car bombs all over the place. Iraq is a dangerous place to live. Deal with it. If we publicised every incedent of violence there, the news broadcasts would be HOURS long. Iraq is a warzone. You can't publish something every time a bullet is fired in a warzone. It just doesn't work that way.
| geyikkutuphanesi wrote: |
| S3nd K3ys! u just making a kind of anti-islam propaganda here ! I don't know what u want to say. But I know that you are just againist muslims and muslims enemies are frends for you. When u r making a genocide in middle east that is too absurd to keep terrorists in Qandil. There is a mountain. Not a village or city! Thay r just terrorists. Not the same with you.. |
Actually, no. I am making an anti-terrorist propoganda here. Not so much anti-islam and definately not anti-muslim, although for the life of me I can't understand why more muslims don't denounce the terrorists and try to get back the respect for Islam which it deserves.
I realize that the majority of muslims are not terrorists. I also realize that the majority of people living in Iran don't believe the same as their leader and many like him believe. But I DO realize there's a serious problem here (with terrorism) and I DO realize that there ARE people trying to kill us under the guise of Islam.
And yes, I agree that I probably don't know enough about the Kurds as I should, which probably made my interpretation of these new attacks by Iran incorrect. But if Iran truely IS getting attacked by "terrorists", then HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!I agree, you'd never know it in the US media. Even if Iran's claim is correct--I doubt it--at least the media should be covering this. Guaranteed if there was a "Cat" or a "Dog" killed by a US soldier for the fun of it that would be all over the US news for nights on end.
Granted I'm getting carried away, but they clearly wouldn't want to cover news like this because it may make some of the military moves look more acceptable.
The point is they should report the news (all of it) and not pick and choose what news they think is most fitting for their agenda.
We stopped reporting on the beheadings that are going on in Iraq some time ago. But really, does it make any difference that it's not reported? We still know that it's happening. The question is, who cares about it? Human life really isn't that valuable anymore. Its a dime a dozen, especially when it comes to "those people"
| S3nd K3ys wrote: |
http://www.kurdishaspect.com/doc818106.html
| Quote: | August 18, 2006
Iran shelling Kurdish villages again
Kurdishaspect.com
Friday August 18, 2006 Kurdishaspect.com - Iranian forces have started firing artillery shells at a camp of Kurdish rebels in Qandil area again, killing two civilians. |
But you wouldn't know that from watching US media. |
Can you see the problem? | Quote: |
| I agree, you'd never know it in the US media. Even if Iran's claim is correct--I doubt it--at least the media should be covering this. Guaranteed if there was a "Cat" or a "Dog" killed by a US soldier for the fun of it that would be all over the US news for nights on end. |
Unfortunately, I agree completely. I can see it now..
"Tonight's Biggest Story"
A U.S. soldier has just stepped on and crushed a bug in the Iraqi desert. The Humans for Animal Rights organization seeks to punish the soldier to the fullest extent it can. There will be a court hearing for the soldier sometime in the near future.
And at the same time, Iraq could've made some serious steps in becomming their own democracy. But you wouldn't hear the good news about Iraq here, because media only seeks to try and poke holes in the Bush administration.
| Quote: |
| The point is they should report the news (all of it) and not pick and choose what news they think is most fitting for their agenda. |
Agreed. For the longest time I heard only of car bombings in Iraq and rarely of the progress being made with their new government. Hmm, I wonder why? *cough* liberal media *cough*
