FRIHOSTFORUMSSEARCHFAQTOSBLOGSCOMPETITIONS
You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!


why to believe?





Rev` -
1st - sry 4 bad english but I cannot do anything Smile

so, I was thinking about "why you believe in something?"
I don't believe in gods or such things.
I'm just a ateist and that's it.
So my q is "Why do you believe in something?"

best regards

-Rev Smile
thpn
Your question is very vauge, but I will try my best to anser the way you want.

I believe in the things I do because that is what I have learned by praying and reading scripture. I follow what the Catholic Church believes as a Protestant follows their church's beliefs. For some, the beliefs have been passed down through thier families and they believe that because their brother, sisiter, mother, and father believes that also.

P.S. The new rules say that you can't excuse yourself for bad engilsh, either post right or go to the other language forums.
The Czar
I believe in things so I can proudly say I have faith.
woundedhealer
I have always been very spiritual. I've always felt a connection to nature. I din't wake up one day and decide this is what I believe in, it's always been part of me. i've always considered myself as pagan, and as I grew up I became drawn to Druidism. I have always accepted the fact that no matter how much I know, there is always more to learn about, and I enjoy learning.
Soulfire
I believe, because I know. The perfection and harmony in nature points to deliberate design, not a mere accident or mistake. Christianity has also been in my family since - forever, so you could say I was born into religion (which I have no complaints about).
Juparis
The question itself is very subjective, and it's something I like to ask others.
Many times (at least very often in my area), people seem to believe what they do simply because that was the way they were raised. They were grown to think that what they believe is truth. It's a shame, really, that they never even consider other possibility. We might even get some tolerance that way..

Anyway, I believe what I do because of my life. I was agnostic for a long time, trying to meditate on the idea of which religion would be the truth (for me). I tried not to confine myself simply because I was raised a Christian, but in truth I think that may have guided my end decision.
loyal
so what religion are you Juparis?
johanfh
I'm raised as a christian and I'm still a christian. The first years (maybe the first 18 years or so) I believed because I was raised that way. (Note: I really believed, but I didn't really consider why)
But the last years I noticed that if I believe there is a God a lot of things in the world make sense. Not all, I don't have all the answers. But believing in a loving God, a real person, which is mourning for all the deaths and injured and which is working to renew this world gives me the secureness that this world will come to a 'happy' end Wink
Besides, I sometimes notice that God is there. I don't mean I had a 'paranormal' experience or something like that. I just mean the feeling you can have when you are in the same room with a loved one. You don't have to look, you just know he or she is there. A little bit like that.

So, that's why I believe in God. I just know He is there and He wants me to be with him. That amazes me.

JohanFH
Che
It's a good little thing to have for when you're laying in bed wondering what will be... nice feeling really
hyhy
Soulfire wrote:
I believe, because I know. The perfection and harmony in nature points to deliberate design, not a mere accident or mistake. Christianity has also been in my family since - forever, so you could say I was born into religion (which I have no complaints about).


You guess not know. And funny, where's the harmony and perfection? If you look at the universe u see everything is made randomly, meteors and others such things move randomly and we dont know will they hit us or not. And if u look at the smallest things such as atoms (which make everything on the world) you will see that they move (im talking about gases because in others atoms doesn't move) randomly and you can not also predict how and why they move that. Just chaos. Random events rule this world.
Huntress
right now, its often because beliefs are already part of you upbringing, parents passes down to their children... the children later on will find their own belief or will remain to the same belief they have, which they will be passing on to their children... this is the logical reason of the belief.

Personally, I have my own belief because somehow I still hope that there is hope for any negative event or emotion... one's own ideals that everything will be fine isn't enough, that they have to have some divine belief or intervention to make themselves belief that there is indeed hope... its like saying, "to see it is to believe it..."... but that's just my opinion...
Bluedoll
Why do I believe in what I believe? I look at this question not as what are my reasons for a belief but why I have a right to believe.
I believe in God with all my heart and I just do not mean I have a belief in God but that I actually believe in God .... believe God will fulfill a promise. I believe, I do not have to apologize, justify nor offer reasons for my belief or even provide logical arguments either to other people or myself. I can still question everything but I do not need to understand everything to have a relationship. I can, why, because, I exercise and maintain my free will, and choose.

Very Happy
Bikerman
You also have a right to :
  • believe that setting yourself on fire won't hurt
  • believe that the Invisible Pink Unicorn is wayyyy better than Jesus
  • believe that someone has actually asked you to apologise
  • believe that your previous posting makes some sort of sense.
Bluedoll
Bikerman wrote:
You also have a right to :
  • believe that setting yourself on fire won't hurt
  • believe that the Invisible Pink Unicorn is wayyyy better than Jesus
  • believe that someone has actually asked you to apologise
  • believe that your previous posting makes some sort of sense.
You have the right to believe you are not a trool.

Laughing
Bikerman
It is a confused and deluded reason to believe anything - because you have the right. Of course you have the right - as I said you have the right to believe any idiotic thing you want to - that is not a good reason for doing so.
The idea of a 'relationship' with Jesus where 'God keeps promises' is simply wishful thinking and self deception. If God really talks to you then you probably have 1st stage schizophrenia. If you try to say what exactly this 'promise' is then you will find that you cannot say anything useful about it, because that would require something concrete - something real and therefore measurable. When you try to measure this 'promise' you will find it impossible - that's why we call it faith.
Bluedoll
Bikerman wrote:
It is a confused and deluded reason to believe anything - because you have the right. Of course you have the right - as I said you have the right to believe any idiotic thing you want to - that is not a good reason for doing so.
You have made a choice for yourself and yes it is your right to do so. I am not confused or deluded with my beliefs but very comfortable with them and yes I own them, they are part of me. Yes, I do have a right to believe anything I like and whether you think they are idiotic or not I really do not care. Though you can have beliefs and opinions yourself and certainly seem to want to express them, you can not seem to resist the urge to point your little atheist principles directly at me. I refuse to accept what you state. You seem to think you can rule over someone else beliefs and demand justification from them. Do you actually think I need a good reason for my beliefs or is it I must report those reasons to you? I do not have to provide anything to you or your little board friends. I do not have to belief in your atheist propaganda and I do not have to give reason to you or provide proofs or give you or anyone else any explanation for my beliefs.

I believe in God with all my heart and I just do not mean I have a belief in God but that I actually believe in God .... believe God will fulfill a promise. I choose to believe what I want.
Bikerman
So why do you waste people's time then? If you don't want to explain your beliefs then why interrupt people who do? The only possible reason would be either to get attention or to interrupt perfectly good conversations with trolling. If you've got nothing to say then say nothing - that's fine.

PS if you actually read what I WROTE instead of what you think I wrote, I didn't say your beliefs were idiotic. I said you have the right to believe idiotic things. Hence my earlier reference to fire not hurting - it is an example to illustrate a general point - just because you have the right to believe any idiocy you like, that doesn't make it either sensible or even sane to do so. I can believe that I am a small teapot if I want - it is my right. That isn't a very good reason to believe it though and it would be wrong, regardless of my 'right'. Having the right to believe something doesn't suddenly mean that the belief itself is anything other than lunacy.
Bluedoll
Bikerman wrote:
So why do you waste people's time then? If you don't want to explain your beliefs then why interrupt people who do? The only possible reason would be either to get attention or to interrupt perfectly good conversations with trolling. If you've got nothing to say then say nothing - that's fine.

PS if you actually read what I WROTE instead of what you think I wrote, I didn't say your beliefs were idiotic. I said you have the right to believe idiotic things. Hence my earlier reference to fire not hurting - it is an example to illustrate a general point - just because you have the right to believe any idiocy you like, that doesn't make it either sensible or even sane to do so. I can believe that I am a small teapot if I want - it is my right. That isn't a very good reason to believe it though and it would be wrong, regardless of my 'right'. Having the right to believe something doesn't suddenly mean that the belief itself is anything other than lunacy.
I came into this post along with many others and dropped a simple post about what I thought concerning the question in the op. I knew exactly what you meant but I do not agree with you on so many levels.
loremar
I believe that we can live eternally. I believe so because I can not just accept that death would be the end of my existence. And believing so wouldn't hurt anyway. If I won't exist after I'm dead, I won't be able to regret that I did but If I will exist then I will be glad that I did that is if I can remember that I did.
And it is reasonable for me to believe so like any animals who fears of death and it is in my intelligence as a human being where I benefit of being able to believe. Pray
myuzor1
The life of faith is very important to us all as man or woman.

Our faith in Christ is what holds us .

I notice that people who have faith in Christ has never had reason to regret.

Faith is believing that God will do what he says he will do...
bukaida
One thing I can say that if you donot believe yourself , you will not be able to change your life. Belief is the source of hope and give strength to fight the odd. Remember the old Greek story of Pandora's box--When all bad thing came out of that box, the only good thing was HOPE which let human fight with all bad things like anger, sorrow etc.
shivaghimire
I believe and have faith. But I am not that person to keep faith as I am christian, Hindu, Muslim Buddhist or any other. I learn, listen and watch books, programs and shows respectively and follow good things of all. throw out bad aspects and receive good things of all religion. This helped me to establish good relations with all people equally for me.
Bikerman
So you believe that Jesus Christ is your saviour and God, that Jesus Christ is not God, that Yaweh the one and only God and that he isn't. That when we die we reincarnate and that when we die we remain until judgement day.
Interesting belief system but it would make my head hurt.
spinout
why to believe? It is in our genetics! just that simple.
Hello_World
why to believe? Why, there is no reason to believe. Smile
Dennise
Are you speaking of spiritual "things"?

I believe in things that are proven to be true and not because someone says so i.e. man i.e.most religions.

I do so because such beliefs make my and others lives safer, longer and more interesting and enjoyable.

So what exactly are you asking?
baboosaa
Well if you are in a war with any people or country and you don't have any one to believe than you are in big problem. You may have all powers to fight with but you will not have power to control everything that happens.
And even if any thing like god does not exists you can always make your heart believe in it. After all believing in something is better than believing in nothing.
Bikerman
baboosaa wrote:
Well if you are in a war with any people or country and you don't have any one to believe than you are in big problem. You may have all powers to fight with but you will not have power to control everything that happens.
And you think belief gives you the power to control what happens?
Quote:
And even if any thing like god does not exists you can always make your heart believe in it. After all believing in something is better than believing in nothing.
False dichotomy,yawn.
How about 'believing in those things that are supported by evidence is better than believing in fairies' ?
I think you are profoundly confused. You think it better to believe in God, even if God doesn't exist? Which God would you like me to believe in? Yaweh the butcher? Zeus? Shiva?
baboosaa
Bikerman wrote:
baboosaa wrote:
Well if you are in a war with any people or country and you don't have any one to believe than you are in big problem. You may have all powers to fight with but you will not have power to control everything that happens.
And you think belief gives you the power to control what happens?
Quote:
And even if any thing like god does not exists you can always make your heart believe in it. After all believing in something is better than believing in nothing.
False dichotomy,yawn.
How about 'believing in those things that are supported by evidence is better than believing in fairies' ?
I think you are profoundly confused. You think it better to believe in God, even if God doesn't exist? Which God would you like me to believe in? Yaweh the butcher? Zeus? Shiva?



I think you got me all wrong. The true meaning of believing in god means to believe in that God which you seek to find all your life. No material god will be there. For example if I say that you believe in a theory, there's no problem in it. It's to some extent the same way. But ideas do not have physical existence, it's people's mind they live in. So is the God. If some one is desperate to find that God, people like BUDDHA will find it. Like some one said "if you think you have reached very very far in your path to find god and you think you cannot move ahead it's just half way there. "
Bikerman wrote:
And you think belief gives you the power to control what happens?
False dichotomy,yawn.

The power to control anything is not acquired by any one. You can predict what might happen but you cannot control anything hot even your own breathing. Ancient part of brain does it. But if you believe in something or God there's placebo effect that comes in action.
Bikerman
If there is a need in the human psyche for belief in something to provide a 'search', that simply means that religion is entirely arbitrary. You may as well believe in Zeus or The Sun if the point is to induce some placebo mechanism.
spinout
So if it is our genetics -who planted it there?? For no reason???
I think it is a logical explanation:

1. we do learn from the peek-a-boo game at early age
2. We apply that on the world to survive, imagining that there is a predator around the corner.
3. We are social
4. And if a world of shit, it might be appealing that it might not be just shit in the sky...
5. Created big groups that also had ideas of populate it self, and had the brain capacity to imagine the enemy and therefore predicted and won battles.

bingo - lots of genes with the inprinted idea to believe!
Bikerman
Nonono....that is not how it works at all.
Genetic traits survive if they offer an advantage in reproductive terms. Belief in God doesn't directly offer that - it has to be something else. Personally I find Dennett's model convincing. Religion is simply a 'misfiring' of the tendency to assign 'cause' to events.
Assigning 'intention' is a shortcut and therefore offers a survival advantage.
'That tiger intends to eat me' is a much shorter path to running like hell than 'hello, here's some new animal, I wonder what those large teeth and claws are designed for.....'.
Because assigning 'agency' is selected for, we assign it where non exists. Thus the thunderstorm must have an 'agent'. The bad harvest must be caused by something being angry. And so on...until you end up with monotheistic deities.
spinout
nonono - hm, wolfpacks...

People are afraid of wolfpacks...
Wolfpacks grow into... warewolfs.
Warewolfs must be the friends of something bigger - the Devil!
Poeple like knights, knights become heroes...
Jeanne d'arc becomes holy.
Holy people must be friends of something bigger - The God!

Just like a chess game. You see the metafor.
Omif
The question itself is very subjective, and it's something I like to ask others.
Many times (at least very often in my area), people seem to believe what they do simply because that was the way they were raised. They were grown to think that what they believe is truth. It's a shame, really, that they never even consider other possibility. We might even get some tolerance that way..

Anyway, I believe what I do because of my life. I was agnostic for a long time, trying to meditate on the idea of which religion would be the truth (for me). I tried not to confine myself simply because I was raised a Christian, but in truth I think that may have guided my end decision.[/quote]

You believe in something, or maybe trust something because you cannot know everything, if yu want very general answer
Dennise
I believe in what I can glean from my five senses, my own intellect and what I or others can repeat with the same result. ... i.e. the scientific method. For those reasons, I believe in the hard sciences, especially physics.

When it comes right down to it, I think many (most?) religious people believe because they want others to do their thinking for them and make tough choices for them - thus relieving them of the mental and emotional burden of doing these for themselves. Here are a few additional reasons:

They cannot handle:
    dying with no after-life: a real biggie
    being forgotten after death
    never seeing their loved ones after death
    the trials and tribulations of mortal life


Instead, they like:
    the idea of forgiveness even for the most heinous acts they may have committed
    no sin
    heavenly reunions with family and loved ones
    the thought of heavenly afterlife bliss where everyone is there, all are friendly and loving and want for nothing, milk & honey, gold paved streets, virgins, unlimited M&Ms yada yada yada


Face it, life's a bitch or what you make of it here on this planet, then you die. It's really not that complicated.
Bikerman
I think you miss a very 'biggie'.
  • The fact that bad things happen to good people and good things happen to bad people

There is a really deep sense of 'justice' in most people. It is interesting to speculate about where this comes from - whether it has evolutionary roots or is purely sociological - but the fact remains that most of us have it.
It seems wrong, on a 'cosmic' level, that people who are apparently good, or at least largely innocent, have terrible things happen to them. It offends against our sense of justice. The notion of some divine 'score-keeper' is therefore very attractive...
deanhills
Dennise wrote:
I believe in what I can glean from my five senses, my own intellect and what I or others can repeat with the same result. ... i.e. the scientific method. For those reasons, I believe in the hard sciences, especially physics.
I don't understand, none of the above has anything to do with belief? Science is not about belief, but theory. If you are going to base your beliefs on your five senses, you're going to be in trouble too, as our senses are very limited.

Furthermore, if by implication you may think that the religious are not interested in science and are not using their intellect you could not be that knowledgeable about the religious either. Something has to be lacking in intellect here?

Dennise wrote:
When it comes right down to it, I think many (most?) religious people believe because they want others to do their thinking for them and make tough choices for them - thus relieving them of the mental and emotional burden of doing these for themselves. Here are a few additional reasons [....] etc.
OK, I've got a question for you here. Why are you so focused on what religious people believe in? Why can't you have your own thinking about beliefs without knocking religious beliefs? Could it possibly be that the religious are doing all your thinking for you in reverse?
Hello_World
Quote:
Why are you so focused on what religious people believe in? [...] Could it possibly be that the religious are doing all your thinking for you in reverse?


Is it not natural to develop your own beliefs with a view to what great thinkers have come up with before you? Is it not natural to test your own beliefs against others?

And then, when you find something you think is right, to want to pass that 'truth', your 'insights', to others?
therimalaya
I believe in something because i create a different kind of feeling inside me. The different feeling creates belief inside me and thus I believe in that thing.
loremar
Sorry, but feelings aren't always reliable. Just as much as anything can go wrong in our body, the chemical processes that is involved in feelings can also go wrong.
deanhills
Hello_World wrote:
Quote:
Why are you so focused on what religious people believe in? [...] Could it possibly be that the religious are doing all your thinking for you in reverse?


Is it not natural to develop your own beliefs with a view to what great thinkers have come up with before you? Is it not natural to test your own beliefs against others?

And then, when you find something you think is right, to want to pass that 'truth', your 'insights', to others?
I did not get a sense of Dennise referring to great thinkers in religion. Sounds great to pass on truth and insights to others. I still don't get it though. Why test the truth against beliefs that one thinks is bogus? There has to be a point where those beliefs that are considered bogus aren't relevant any more. The fact that they are made that important to me gives substance to the very subject that is being negated. The louder it is negated, the more substance there is.
Dennise
deanhills wrote:
Dennise wrote:
I believe in what I can glean from my five senses, my own intellect and what I or others can repeat with the same result. ... i.e. the scientific method. For those reasons, I believe in the hard sciences, especially physics.
I don't understand, none of the above has anything to do with belief? Science is not about belief, but theory. If you are going to base your beliefs on your five senses, you're going to be in trouble too, as our senses are very limited.

Call it what you want, belief, theory or the scientific method. Science is based on what our five senses can perceive, what is repeatable and can be challenged any time by anyone.

Furthermore, if by implication you may think that the religious are not interested in science and are not using their intellect you could not be that knowledgeable about the religious either. Something has to be lacking in intellect here?

Dennise wrote:
When it comes right down to it, I think many (most?) religious people believe because they want others to do their thinking for them and make tough choices for them - thus relieving them of the mental and emotional burden of doing these for themselves. Here are a few additional reasons [....] etc.
OK, I've got a question for you here. Why are you so focused on what religious people believe in? Why can't you have your own thinking about beliefs without knocking religious beliefs? Could it possibly be that the religious are doing all your thinking for you in reverse?
Dennise
[quote="Dennise"][quote="deanhills"]
Dennise wrote:
I believe in what I can glean from my five senses, my own intellect and what I or others can repeat with the same result. ... i.e. the scientific method. For those reasons, I believe in the hard sciences, especially physics.
I don't understand, none of the above has anything to do with belief? Science is not about belief, but theory. If you are going to base your beliefs on your five senses, you're going to be in trouble too, as our senses are very limited.

Call it what you want, belief, theory or the scientific method. Science is based on what our five senses can perceive, what is repeatable and can be challenged any time by anyone. In previous posts, I have listed science contributions that have helped mankind immensely ... pretty impressive for achievements based only on five senses.

Furthermore, if by implication you may think that the religious are not interested in science and are not using their intellect you could not be that knowledgeable about the religious either. Something has to be lacking in intellect here? This was NOT my intention. Many gifted scientists have two major beliefs: science AND religion. How they resolve the two has always been a mystery to me.

Dennise wrote:
When it comes right down to it, I think many (most?) religious people believe because they want others to do their thinking for them and make tough choices for them - thus relieving them of the mental and emotional burden of doing these for themselves. Here are a few additional reasons [....] etc. OK, I've got a question for you here. Why are you so focused on what religious people believe in? Why can't you have your own thinking about beliefs without knocking religious beliefs? Could it possibly be that the religious are doing all your thinking for you in reverse?

Yes, I should have limited my remarks to MY beliefs only in answer to the OP's original question. However I assure you that the religious are NOT doing my thinking in reverse .... whatever that mumbo-jumbo means. However, if you can prove such a thing, I'd be very interested.
deanhills
Dennise wrote:
Call it what you want, belief, theory or the scientific method. Science is based on what our five senses can perceive, what is repeatable and can be challenged any time by anyone. In previous posts, I have listed science contributions that have helped mankind immensely ... pretty impressive for achievements based only on five senses.
So why would those who believe in God automatically be against science? I admire science greatly. Science to me is progress, moving forwards, discovering new things, having an Internet, new technology every day, I thrive on that. So why should you feel you are one up on those who believe in God because you attach a great importance to science. The overwhelming majority of those who believe in God also attach a great importance to science!

Dennise wrote:
Yes, I should have limited my remarks to MY beliefs only in answer to the OP's original question. However I assure you that the religious are NOT doing my thinking in reverse .... whatever that mumbo-jumbo means. However, if you can prove such a thing, I'd be very interested.
I probably also did not express myself properly. I just find it fascinating that you need to knock the religious in order to have a point of view about beliefs. It's almost like a paradox to me.

All you have to say is that you don't have a belief system. And how you deal with reality. Instead of knocking religion by pointing out how horribly unenlightened those of religion are in order to prove you are not. That to me is not evidence of being enlightened.
Hello_World
Deanhills:
Quote:
I did not get a sense of Dennise referring to great thinkers in religion. Sounds great to pass on truth and insights to others. I still don't get it though. Why test the truth against beliefs that one thinks is bogus? There has to be a point where those beliefs that are considered bogus aren't relevant any more. The fact that they are made that important to me gives substance to the very subject that is being negated. The louder it is negated, the more substance there is.


Your post got me thinking about the more generalised question you and others put to us atheists - why do you want to talk about religion?

I can't speak for Dennise, I was really thinking a bit more generally.

I think there are 2 main reasons why atheists talk about religion.

One is a practical and political reason - that some of us feel that religions are a block to a better future. This is the main reason I talk about religion.

The other is a 'spiritual' reason. The better I am able to demonstrate the inconsistancies of various religions, the more confident I feel in my own judgement, or alternatively, find something I feel affinity with if that is what the search brings.

Why test things against bogus ideas? I guess I would have to say, that as 'bogus' as I think the major 'One God' religions are, they are believed by a huge amount of people. I seem to revisit the whole religion question every 5 or so years, 'check' if I still think they are all bogus... Personally, I don't think it shows the importance of any particular religion but that it shows how dominant and tenacious the religions are. I also tend to revisit other important philosophies, including those by Karl Marx, and others, every so often too.

The idea that we have all taken a reverse engineered version of some religion is not correct. Although there may be some that have, and they'd be few and far between, at least speaking for myself, values I have built have not come from Christianity or a 'reverse' Christianity nor a Christian basis with adjustments to suit myself, but from a different basis.


As to Denisses post, I see someone who answered the question 'why to believe'? She thinks that the reasons people believe are the list she put out. Yes, I agree she implies religious people are less scientifically minded, and yes, she implies that religious people are taking a softer option.

Why do I not believe in a God... or more positively, what do I believe in? The earth, the universe as a fantastic, amazing place which fills me with awe without any need of a higher power. I believe in humanity similarly as fantastically diverse and fastinating. I (try to) live according to what I have considered best for society.
deanhills
Hello_World wrote:
I think there are 2 main reasons why atheists talk about religion.

One is a practical and political reason - that some of us feel that religions are a block to a better future. This is the main reason I talk about religion.
From what point of view is it a block? I know there are extremes in religion, however the majority who are in religion don't like those extremes either.

Hello_World wrote:
The other is a 'spiritual' reason. The better I am able to demonstrate the inconsistancies of various religions, the more confident I feel in my own judgement, or alternatively, find something I feel affinity with if that is what the search brings.
This is what knocks me for six however. How solid can a person's judgement be if it is based on inconsistencies of various religions, particularly if they are based on the extremes of those religions? It's almost like having a glass that is half full and half empty, and then going for the empty part only when you develop your judgement.

Hello_World wrote:
The idea that we have all taken a reverse engineered version of some religion is not correct. Although there may be some that have, and they'd be few and far between, at least speaking for myself, values I have built have not come from Christianity or a 'reverse' Christianity nor a Christian basis with adjustments to suit myself, but from a different basis.
I probably did not say it right. What I meant is what you have already covered above. I.e. why focus on inconsistencies only in order to come to a judgment. How sound can a judgment be if it is only focused on the inconsistencies.

Hello_World wrote:
Why do I not believe in a God... or more positively, what do I believe in? The earth, the universe as a fantastic, amazing place which fills me with awe without any need of a higher power. I believe in humanity similarly as fantastically diverse and fastinating. I (try to) live according to what I have considered best for society.
I admire the positive part immensely. Now this I can relate to 100%. Except of course I see God as intrinsically part of it all.
ankurthakur
See man !

The God will not give a proof to you first, but you must give him a proof first that you can follow good things and can be good in sight of God Wink

Then God gives you the proof that he is watching and helping you and is with you at every moment of your Life. And you will feel his power in your Day to Day life when your small things will get complete easily.

But for that, you must first believe on something with true spirit Cool

I am experienced Smile
Hello_World
Quote:
This is what knocks me for six however. How solid can a person's judgement be if it is based on inconsistencies of various religions, particularly if they are based on the extremes of those religions? It's almost like having a glass that is half full and half empty, and then going for the empty part only when you develop your judgement.


My judgement on my own values are not based on the inconsistancies of various religions... my judgement comes from my heart, my brain, my eyes... from experiences and events that confirm my truthes over time... One part of my judgement, and what we are talking about, is that there is no God of any form.

Essentially, I formed that judgement as a response to feeling that it was more likely then not that there is no God.

But when the majority of the world differs in opinion, I do feel the need to ask myself, am I right? What are they seeing that I don't? And so, I go back again and look whether or not I think I am in the few that is right or the many that are wrong.

And so, for example, I go back and see that the Bible has morals which are inconsistant with my key morals. I see things that just don't make sense. And then I think, well the many may see something but it sure as shit ain't for me.

In truth, even where I find it consistant, I still don't really believe, and this also causes me to confirm my views. For example, when I thought that Buddhists had to believe in a physical version of re-incarnation, and I quite like their philosophy and religion and find it remarkably moral, I was still unable, after trying, to believe in that process.

And in fact, I find that critisising things can lead to new understanding... and the point in case which stands out for me right now is that re-incarnation does not have to be a physical process.

I can't speak for any other atheist, but this is my experience with it all, as a 'spiritual' thing.

As to it being a block. I agree that there is a version of (any) religion which is no longer a block. Where that point is, I'm not sure if we would agree or not. There are certainly many people who fall inside this category. I think perhaps there are three types of religious people. Those who embrace values such as freedom of religion, secularism/separation of church and state, making society a better state in the here and now, using reason alone to determine what is best for society. Then there are those who philosophically fall outside that, and thus are enemies of society in my view (and to use religious terminology, are therefore evil.) And there are those may fall outside that, but only because there are points of view they haven't realised, or they may be subject to prejudges that they are not aware of yet... (like all people... nothing special about religious people and prejudges).

I don't know truely where most religious people fall in this characterisation. But I do know that those who are outside the 'point' through ignorance or philosophy certainly have a lot of power, a lot of influence, a lot of media, and have caused many many problems. I do know it continues to be an issue, a big issue. A block to a better future.

I firmly think that the overwhelming majority of people want to be 'good'. Religion concerns me when people who are busy trying to be 'good' are actually harming people and/or society because some ancient dictate says so.

EDIT: If we want to keep discussing this, I think we'd better split. *sigh* I find it so hard to stay on topic. One idea leads to the next....
Related topics
The Middle East Conflict
Do you belive in the life after death??
ghosts are they real??
"Its not natural." And that makes it bad?
Why you SHOULD believe in God
Destiny versus freewill
A question for people who believe in heaven:
Proof god exists
[Official] God - NO LONGER A STICKY
Why you don't translate websites in English??
Musings on agnosticism
Provide evidence of the Supernatural (God et al.)
was our ancient history more advanced than the present?
Morality and violence
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Lifestyle and News -> Philosophy and Religion

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.