FRIHOSTFORUMSSEARCHFAQTOSBLOGSCOMPETITIONS
You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!


The World Cup and New Nationalism





newsoft
In 3 hours Germany will play its final game at this World Cup, with the host nation playing in the third place match against Portugal. The third place match has historically been seen as unimportant, somewhat of an exhibition game, its primary purpose being to tide football hungry fans over during the break between the semi-finals and final, and to give the players of the winning semi-finalists one extra day of rest before they play the biggest match of their lives. However, having spent the last three weeks in Germany, I expect this match to be highly contested. This World Cup has had a profound impact on Germany, most notably because it has given Germans a chance to experience what so many other nations take for granted: guilt-free nationalism.
Speaking with Germans in their early twenties about differences between America and Germany, one thing is clear. Though they disagree with our politics, they envy our national pride. I was told often that the Germans do not feel proud to be German, because of “the history,” an oblique reference to World War II and the Holocaust, and because Germany is still struggling with issues resulting from reintegration after the fall of the Berlin Wall. These issues include a noticeable gap in the standard of living between former East and West Germany, and West German anger that a disproportionate amount of their taxes are still going to pay off the Germany’s decision in 1989 to honor the West German mark and the East German mark equally, despite clear differences in their value. Before the World Cup, I was told that the German flag was rarely seen in any capacity, and that the national anthem was sung with a degree of apathy. I arrived the day after Germany eeked out a 4-2 win over Costa Rica, and the mood was still profoundly pessimistic; the Germans believed their team was sub-par, their coach inexperienced, and their prospects for success bleak.
However, all that has changed in the last three weeks. The change is noticeable and it is real. Football is not a cure-all for national malaise, but in the case of Germany it has done wonders to create a sense of national unity that other nations take for granted. For the first time in the memory of older Berliners, they have seen people driving around with the German flag hanging out their car windows, a sight that is common in the cities of very other nation participating in the World Cup (with the exception of America).
Gripes about the team and the coach have melted away. The tournament has given the Germans an opportunity to dispell stereotypes about their “national character,” (cold, somewhat dour, unexpressive, and disciplined), and the Germans have taken full advantage of it. The sight of the slightly frumpy Chancellor Merkel jumping up and down with reckless abandon when Germany advanced to the second round by beating Poland 1-0, and of Jurgen Klinsman, the current German coach and ex-star player, doing the same, is evidence enough of that.
For other teams at this World Cup, football has served as a proxy for struggles and triumphs of nationalism in their respective countries. Most notable is the Ivory Coast, a country that effectively put off a civil war for the sake of national unity ahead of the World Cup. Their squad is a perfect mix, ethnically, of each of the warring factions involved, but the squad and the nation came together well to seriously challenge Holland and Argentina, deserving to win both games but unable to convert a bevy of scoring chances. I was at the stadiums for these games, and I saw firsthand the degree to which football had brought a war-torn nation together. Muslim and Christian mattered less than being Ivorien. Of course, this brief spell of harmony may not last, but the spell itself speaks volumes about how football explains nationalisms triumphs and failures Surprised
romaop
As you mention, football has its strengh on the societies. It seems to me that Germans became more united and with more belief in their capacity to make a stronger German country. Their history was well renewed with this event. The organization, the fantastic 3rd place, the fairplay from german players and the promotion of Germany, all went well.
Without genious players (Ballack was far from his top form) Klinsmann mounted an agressive team.
And what about Ivory Coasters. Football stopped briefly a war where players from different creeds showed that they could work as a team. But football isn't also that strong enough and society problems also remain to be, or not, solved.
faker_phil
romaop wrote:
Ballack was far from his top form


Dito.

Excellent post newsoft, would have put it the same way. I like the new German sentiment, all the unity and so on. I just looked up "frumpy", and there couldn't be a better word for Chancellor Merkel. It looked so funny when she was jumping up and down, clapping her hands like a schoolgirl Laughing
What I have to add to her, though:
While our team was playing the quarter and semi finals, our Chancellor brought in two new reforms, one Health reform and some otther one. She did that very slick, and everybody is now wondering what other reform would have been coming if Germany would have played the final (if only...).
Related topics
Argentina tops Brazil for World Cup spot
Australia has finally made it to the World Cup!
[OFFICIAL] World Cup 2006
Quem vai ganhar o World Cup 2006
Sven to quit after World Cup - UK
Cricket World Cup 2006
Fifa World Cup 2006
Workers need time to watch World Cup?
Who do you think's going to win the Soccer World Cup
Australia win the Cricket World Cup...again
FIFA Women's World Cup
T20 World Cup - Rock$ or Shake$
World Cup in the United States again?
Rugby World Cup Final
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Sports and Entertainment -> Sports

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.