FRIHOSTFORUMSSEARCHFAQTOSBLOGSCOMPETITIONS
You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!


who thinks...





Elephantman
Who thinks that it's wrong to not hire someone because of the length of their hair? I think it's wrong becuase not only is that discrimination, stereotyping, but classifying me as a certain 'type' of individual that is not worthy of any position of that type of job, nor any type of job in general. Even if I had a good attitude and everything else they still wouldn't let me have the job. Is that wrong in your opinion?
AftershockVibe
Ah well.... yes I suppose it probably isn't fair. I wouldn't say it was necessarily wrong, but it isn't fair - like most of the real world.

What you have to realise is that even if your manager is the greatest guy in the world and cool with anything, the average person is a git. If you have to sell things to people then they will probably refuse to buy something from someone they see as a long haired tree-hugging hippy. So it would therefore be useless for your manager to hire you for the job, as you wouldn't sell anything!

Of course, this depends on the job, if you never have to interact with clients then it shouldn't matter at all.
Nyizsa
No, this is definitely not fair! But the world works this way. If you want to get a good job, you have to be a nice guy with short hair, wearing a dark suit and carrying a briefcase. YUCK!!!! I hate that type. Mad
Gieter
Nyizsa wrote:
No, this is definitely not fair! But the world works this way. If you want to get a good job, you have to be a nice guy with short hair, wearing a dark suit and carrying a briefcase. YUCK!!!! I hate that type. Mad


I don't see why you hate that type? It's just an image of being professional, something widely accepted in Western culture. Besides, most girls love it. Wink
manumiglani
Elephantman wrote:
Who thinks that it's wrong to not hire someone because of the length of their hair? I think it's wrong becuase not only is that discrimination, stereotyping, but classifying me as a certain 'type' of individual that is not worthy of any position of that type of job, nor any type of job in general. Even if I had a good attitude and everything else they still wouldn't let me have the job. Is that wrong in your opinion?


Well thats wrong, no doubt about it.

well i think there should be descrimination on the basis of performance and gender, not on the length of anyone's hair.

well i will surely descriminate the day when i will open my own software firm. There will be no jobs for female gender and females will not be allowed to enter my company's workstation or offices.
pexivee
I don´t know if hair length could accounted as a basis for a discrimination: usually the interviewer is looking for a suitable person for a given a job. His/her job is to evaluate the totality of interviewees personality in a limited time. Certain qualities in your appeareance just get you eliminated earlier on.

I work in a quite conservative setting, but because my field of expertise is slightly artistically bent, I could get away with longer hair. For no good reason , long hair has been associated with asocial behaviour or being eccentric. If a company does not wish to stand out from the crowd, they might take the "conservative" high road. If they live on the edge, they might see your longer hair as an asset...

So, if you don´t want to compromise on your looks, you might want to reconsider the type of employment or type of employer you are looking for.
Related topics
Google Messenger
Link issue ok lookie here,
Lawyers and Blondes, oh my!
Man and Women
The Unofficial Jokes Thread
IE 7 to take a cue from Firefox
skin for phpbb
Music website?
LOST
Garfield
Who thinks Rummy should stay?
Western Digital Sata - system thinks it's connected via SCSI
Miss Beverly Hills Thinks God Wants Gays "Put to Death&
Who thinks Fable 3 is a good game?
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Lifestyle and News -> Jobs and Learning

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.