FRIHOSTFORUMSSEARCHFAQTOSBLOGSDIRECTORY
You are invited to Log in or Register a Frihost Account!

Iran's nuclear weapons

 


rabbani
think Iran doesn't have any nuclear weapon and don't want to have it. Iran only wants to use the power of nuclear. If Iran wants to have nuclear weapons other countries will rush iran. Becuase still Iran isn't like US, UK, Russia etc to do everything it wants. Is Iran's nuclear program really important for you??? Question
ocalhoun
All I say is that in a nuclear WWIII scenario, Iran dosen't stand much of a chance.
Soulfire
rabbani wrote:
think Iran doesn't have any nuclear weapon and don't want to have it. Iran only wants to use the power of nuclear. If Iran wants to have nuclear weapons other countries will rush iran. Becuase still Iran isn't like US, UK, Russia etc to do everything it wants. Is Iran's nuclear program really important for you??? Question

The keyword there is "think". We don't know what the risks are, and we aren't willing to take them. Think of it as pouring gasoline onto a fire that is consuming your house. We already have enough problems in the middle east, do we really need Iran to cause more?

That is not to say they will, but the risk is there, and the risk of nuclear war would not make me want to support Iran in any way. The entire middle east is too instable (currently, and in my opinion) for such powerful weapons.

Then again, if Iran tried something, we'd have 2500 nukes pointed right at them... watching their every move.

It really depends on how closely the world will be watching.
alkady
rabbani wrote:
think Iran doesn't have any nuclear weapon and don't want to have it. Iran only wants to use the power of nuclear. If Iran wants to have nuclear weapons other countries will rush iran. Becuase still Iran isn't like US, UK, Russia etc to do everything it wants. Is Iran's nuclear program really important for you??? Question


True, Iran just can't break the law and get away with it like other countries can. But do remember China and Russia do got Iran's Back and with those two behind them, Iran can do more than the average joe smoe. Right now Iran has just bought time Thanks to the Duo I've just mentioned.
Diebels
ocalhoun wrote:
All I say is that in a nuclear WWIII scenario, Iran dosen't stand much of a chance.


No one has a chance then...
Scorpio
One can say with surety that USA certainly has nuclear weapons, may be hidden underground or maybe somewhere else, but they have it.

They just want to have the monopoly of nuclear weaponry. They dont want others to be ahead of them. That is why they are opposing Iran and threatening to impose sanctions.

Iran has every right to own one.
Just because it is a muslim country or just because its leaders are radical doesnt mean they cant build nuclear weapons.

The reason US is continually hesitating to give Veto status to India in the UN is due to the reason that they want to control india. US thinks Giving 2 neighbours like India and China veto status may impair US freedom.

Just because US opposes doesnt mean everyone should accept. They should realise they are not the only super power in the world, atleast not any more
manu_dlr
This is delicate matters, this is a real fret, and I´m not talking about Iran having nuclear bombs. U.S.A admit theirselves as a war country, with their war president, so that gives a clue on who´s causing this hostility and nonsense to this world.

I´m with the victims of power-driven lunatics, that we can count every day, sadly doing nothing but expecting the devastation.

A minute of silence in the memory of the people lost in middle-east and africa.
710ths
The possibility that Iran could develop nuclear weapons is totally unexceptable. Using nuclear power for energy is OK but it seems a fine borderline between that and weapons if they have access to the right materials.

In any case do we really think that Iran will fire such weapons, no not a chance. In any case why would they need to. They will simply supply crack-pot terrorist with the weapons and let them do the job for them.

That for me is what the real threat of Iran development of nuclear weapons.

Its about time that we all grew up and realised that we are all human and the planet belongs to everyone. We all have a juty to take care of it and stop religion/creed being the catalist that it has been for most of the wars that have been started.
{name here}
Every country has the right to protect themself. Nuclear weapons are a way to do that, not the best way, but can end a war quickly if need be. I say it's fine for Iran to have nuclear weapons, but they should only use them as a last resort and should be sure of protecting them against the threat of one falling into the wrong hands, such as Bin Laden.
Soulfire
Perhaps we should stop pressuring Iran, and let them use nuclear technology, and pray to God that they are not developing nukes to harm us.

It's funny how this works. All the Democrats are all "Oh no, let them use their nuclear energy. Let them do what they want"

So, we do that. Then they nuke us. Then all the survivng Democrats would be "Stupid idiots, why did you let them do that?!"

Ah well, what a twisted world we live in.
Assiez
Iran I think is definitely in the process of building or at least trying to build nuclear weapons. I for one believe that nukes should do not belong in the hands of religious fanatics with a history of *ahem* craziness. And there's another part to the story, if the USA does not do anything about the developing nuclear situation in Iran, it is likely that Israel will, which would leave America to clean up the diplomatic mess. Israel has in the past taken military action to ensure their national security and their intelligence in the middle east is excellent compared to that of America. They would not hesitate to, lets say, deploy a couple of bomber to destroy several Iranian nuclear installations when they find them.
d722002
My opinion:

They do have nukes. They are willing to use them.

I predict an invasion of Iran within the next few months.
felisleo
israil has got nuclear weapons so do russia india pakhistan china...
who decides who can have nuclear weapons or can t us?
when was us put in the role of world police?
SgtGarcia
There are some countries with nuclear weapons that shouldn't have them. Iran shouldn't have nuclear weapons because it is just to risky. Iran isnt a really political stable country. So when some Sadam Hussein like guy is going to rule the country, and that's possible in Iran, you just can't risk such a person with nuclear weapons. He doesn't care about a 3rd world war or something like that so he will use nuclear weapons when he likes too.
Saryon
felisleo wrote:
when was us put in the role of world police?

Never, they just think they are.

But anyway, I'm pretty sure they have nukes too. Almost every country with uranium has nukes. If America is allowed to have nukes, why shouldn't Iran be allowed too. It's not like America can be trusted...
selim06
I think iran has some but not really the world's opinions...and i think if the people want it they can have as USA...USA has lots of nuclear weapon but why they don't complain anybody?If USA has Iran can has...
darknez3
scorpio wrote:
One can say with surety that USA certainly has nuclear weapons, may be hidden underground or maybe somewhere else, but they have it.

They just want to have the monopoly of nuclear weaponry. They dont want others to be ahead of them. That is why they are opposing Iran and threatening to impose sanctions.


You think US has a lot of nukes? Come to Russia, the land where you literally walk on nuclear storage. In terms of nuclear weaponry:
#1 Russia
#2 USA


>> Cold war FTW
ocalhoun
scorpio wrote:


Just because US opposes doesnt mean everyone should accept. They should realise they are not the only super power in the world, atleast not any more

The USA is not the only world power, but it is the world's only super-power.
If that weren't true, then why can we overthrow countries at will, while suffering a sixth of the casualties the enemy does?

Russia and China could possibly make the USA back down, expecialy if they worked together, but neither would dare attack. Nobody wants WWIII.

In a full-scale war Iran's best hope would be that it becomes like Vietnam, with two major powers fighting echother within the bounds of that country.
geeren
rabbani wrote:
think Iran doesn't have any nuclear weapon and don't want to have it. Iran only wants to use the power of nuclear. If Iran wants to have nuclear weapons other countries will rush iran. Becuase still Iran isn't like US, UK, Russia etc to do everything it wants. Is Iran's nuclear program really important for you??? Question


They have plaenty of oil, so they can generate electricity eithout nuclear generators, they are not to trust. Wink Wink
Mason11987
Soulfire wrote:
Perhaps we should stop pressuring Iran, and let them use nuclear technology, and pray to God that they are not developing nukes to harm us.

It's funny how this works. All the Democrats are all "Oh no, let them use their nuclear energy. Let them do what they want"

So, we do that. Then they nuke us. Then all the survivng Democrats would be "Stupid idiots, why did you let them do that?!"

Ah well, what a twisted world we live in.


Nuclear energy <> nuclear weapons.

SEems pretty clear
ocalhoun
geeren wrote:


They have plaenty of oil, so they can generate electricity eithout nuclear generators, they are not to trust.

And they'd be the last ones to try to give an example of reducing dependance on oil to the world.
Sebaci
I will tell here what I know:

USA is gonna attack Iran when Iran attacks Israel. USA will help Israel to win, and USE will take the oil. Iran sells oil to China and when USA takes the oil, will be able to control the economy of China. China is becoming very strong country and will attach the Russia, at last the Europe. There will be THIRD WORLD WAR in 2009 or 2010 year. There will be also Antichrist and "the beast's sign" - 666 number. It means that all people will have some serial number on head or hand, the number will include 18 digits. The first 3 digits are 666. For example: 666 934 295 193 596 291. The code will contatin some info about you, like place where ypu're living, where you work, etc... It all isn't imagined by me Wink It's hidden in BIBLE CODE. Some people encoded some informations and I have read it on one of polish forums. If you know Polish visit this site - www.niewyjasnione.pl and look for third world war topic.

The 3 WorldWar will end in 2012. Laura Bush will die in 2008 or 2009 and Bush will Die a year later. There will be Solar Flare in 2012 - big activity of sun (it will be very hot). The end of the world - 2015 or 2016, but I'm not sure of that.
felisleo
SgtGarcia wrote:
. Iran isnt a really political stable country. So when some Sadam Hussein like guy is going to rule the country, and that's possible in Iran, you just can't risk such a person with nuclear weapons. when he likes too.


are north korea pakhistan or india stable? us is giving support to india for devoloping their nuc guns and be another pole in asia against china.but world
keeps to focus on iran.do you really believe that us doesn t want iran to be nuvlear for nobel reasons like world peace?

Smile
speedlikecy
nuclear weapon make the world to go to die Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad
Devil
felisleo wrote:
SgtGarcia wrote:
. Iran isnt a really political stable country. So when some Sadam Hussein like guy is going to rule the country, and that's possible in Iran, you just can't risk such a person with nuclear weapons. when he likes too.


are north korea pakhistan or india stable? us is giving support to india for devoloping their nuc guns and be another pole in asia against china.but world
keeps to focus on iran.do you really believe that us doesn t want iran to be nuvlear for nobel reasons like world peace?

Smile


it is better to shutup ,when u dont know what ur saying .

USA is not supporting india to make nukes, it is only giving nuclear fuel to those reactors which will be monitored . these reactors will be used for peacefull purpose only , india had nukes from the past 30 years , but has never leaked the info to any other country like pakistan did ,

why is USa supporting india ?
there are many reasons , india and china are buying oil wells all around the world , they need more power , if india gets nuclear fuel from usa , it will need less oil , and the oil prices will go down ,

on the other hand , usa wins a favour with india , so in the long term usa will have a great country's support ,when china becomes more agressive ,

another reason , india has a large market , it has more middleclass familys then the entire population of the United states , so american companies will make a lot of profit ,

another reason ,india and Usa share the same dream , a world without terrorism , they both are democracy , usa being the oldest and india being the largest ,

another reason , india has a lot of graduates coming out , almost 50% of doctors ,Eng etc go to the USA

USa has a ageing population and needs more medical staff ,

i am sure there are a lot of reasons why this nuclear deal between india and usa should go forward , but the more important thing is , india will stop supporting Iran ,

iran enjoys the support of 3 great powers in asia , India ,china and Russia , so it is very important for the usa to get these countries on thier side , before they can do anything with IRan ,
itarlo
If Iran has so much oil why does it need a different source of energy like nuclear energy? it needs nuclear energy only for atom bombs
Devil
cuz they will run out of oil at some point , when half of the world uses thier oil
1one1
Even if Iran is deciding to build nuclear weapons it will take them at least 3 years, by them we should be able to stop them.
Animal
1one1 wrote:
Even if Iran is deciding to build nuclear weapons it will take them at least 3 years, by them we should be able to stop them.


The problem is that Iran only needs one nuclear weapon to cause havoc on the world. As a nation, they have admitted the desire to "wipe Israel off the map" - one or two nuclear warheads would certainly help them achieve that goal. It would also cause massive nuclear fallout in the surrounding regions. Then what? Will the rest of the developed world "nuke" them to prove a point? How will that help? Or will everyone be too scared to act incase some of the nasty nuclear stuff heads their way?

It's a real concern.
loyal
Iran, in reality, has always been powerful. It has existed since the Judisiam times. Perhaps even the hindu times. It was called Persia. Iran has existed without the help of God's messengers and prophets. It has existed without the help of allies. It has been around for a long time. But it has always been powerful. Now with the USA being the main source of power, Iran might be jeleous of its power.

Usa wants oil. The two countries that guarded the west from destroying the Middle East were Iraq and Iran. Now Iraq completely destroyed, there is just Iran.

I have almost no doubts that Iran is building the nuclear weapons. But I am glad they are. Because every other country in the West seems to have them! Isreal has them too. And the difference is, it is willing to use them. Now imagine any situation where one side hits the other side. The rest would be a mass of nuclear weapons flying around. The world would be destroyed.

Everyone does not want Iran to have nuclear weapons and another source of power because they think that the Muslim leaders are like saddam hussein. All the western leaders want Iran to stay weak and so that it does not rise to the power it once possessed.
amirkpe
they want or not ... i thinks it's the duty of the international communities to stop countries to produce nuke weapons even they wanna use them or not .. .if u have sth there's a little possibility that ur goin to use it
1one1
Yikes. This is just perfect. Now we are most likely to attack Iran, and other countries will get involved. (What's the deal with China and Russia, I find that at a lot of sites people are complaining about them) and could lead to a World War III. Not good.
druidbloke
If we find the idea of nukes in iran uncomfortable maybe we should have thought about that before we decided to have them in our own countries, its no good bleating that they will be breaking international law when we were all too happy to do the same when invading iraq. The west and the middle east are far far from understanding each other, which is odd as they have so much in common, unfortunately a lot of which are the bad things.
Related topics

Nuclear Weapons!!!
President Obama Calls for Elimination of Nuclear Weapons
Beam weapons, a new way of warfare?
should our countries make Nuclear weapons?
Iran refuses to stop nuclear work

Iran Completed It's Nuclear Program
Iran's nuclear program
Iran: very close to the nuclear power!!!
U.K. Sunday Times: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran
IRAN'S MILITANT STUDENTS TO SEIZE BRITISH EMBASSY

Farkash sets deadline for strike on Iran
Clinton Scheme Gave Iran Nuke Blueprints
Iran says will resume atomic work
CNN Banned from IRAN
BReaking News (India votes against Iran at IAEA)
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Lifestyle and News -> Discuss World News

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2007 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.