Seriously, is it?
Isn't this good?
Seriously, is it?
Nope, too many flaws. Lacks antialiasing (the upper text seems even noisy couse of that) and the lines are too close which is kind of disturbing element. Oh and the F letter is placed 1 or 2 pixels too much to the left, it seems like detached.
But thats just my two cents.
But thats just my two cents.
To pixely, the font doesn't suit and the present one is pretty good anyone. Nice try
Thanks. I wanted negative comments .
Oh and BTW, the "F" is our favicon
.
.
Oh and BTW, the "F" is our favicon
.And a fine "F" it is. Fabulously fine.
Yeah, its all rather pixelated. No anti-aliasing I suppose. The "F" favicon is also rather pixelated. The current Frihost logo is perfectly fine, you might want to rework the favicon though.
It lack of antialiasing... And by the way, I think that the current logo is too much blurred...
You gus are useless... rather than make a whole post where you state what the 5 people above you have said why not just put '^'
And I like it screw all you people about anti aliasing and other shit.
And I like it screw all you people about anti aliasing and other shit.
Not bad. Going on the assumption that this will be FriHost's new logo, it's pretty basic. Might want to add a bit of 'pizazz'.
Maybe you should put 'Quality' between 'h' and 't', and 'Webhosting' between the two t's.
| Marston wrote: |
| Not bad. Going on the assumption that this will be FriHost's new logo, it's pretty basic. Might want to add a bit of 'pizazz'. |
No. It'll never be Frihost's logo unless Bondings is crazy.
I asked for negative comments from Bondings but he refused to give any, so I asked you all.
No, it's not good
(seriously)
(seriously)
| n0obie4life wrote: | ||
No. It'll never be Frihost's logo unless Bondings is crazy. I asked for negative comments from Bondings but he refused to give any, so I asked you all. |
I see, I see. |