FRIHOST FORUMS SEARCH FAQ TOS BLOGS COMPETITIONS
You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!


Symantec using bully tactics against Spybot





Indyan
Quote:
Back in April 2005, Norton Antivirus by Symantec already had a false positive about one of our products. We couldn't get Symantec to react at first, we wrote an article about that on our website. After that, Symantec could suddenly react, and told us that it would be a question of honor to deal with such things without any publicity. They removed the false positive, and we removed their name from that news article.

Now, we have received more and more complaints over the year that Symantec would recommend to its customers to deinstall Spybot-S&D, because it would corrupt Norton Ghost images. We finally found their knowledgebase article about it, and were a bit surprised to see that while Symantec wants to keep any bad words about their own software out of the public, and deal with it honorably, they have no problems to post wrong facts about the products of their competition on their website without even getting into any contact about this so-called incompability.

Since we wanted to play fair, we gave them a full week to show us evidence that Spybot-S&D would be corrupting Norton Ghost images before we would publically announce this. Mr. Guido Sanchidrian, product marketing manager of Symantec, appeared offended when we told him that his mentioning of honorable non-public discussions in case of incompatibilities seemed to be a farce, but he told us they would take this very seriously and answer on the last day of the given timeframe.

Well, this time is over now, without any explanation why Spybot-S&D would corrupt Norton Ghost images, and I had to threat to sue them with legal action for compensation to get them to remove the name Spybot-S&D.

Still, further promises from Mr. Ingenpass from Symantec to deal with this within the first week of the new year passed without his promised explanation about this incompatibility.

With a second false accusation this year, and no valid explanation given, we can only assume that libel is Symantec's way of trying to force anti-spyware competition out of the market.

We apologize for dragging this into the public, but with continuing complaints from Spybot-S&D users who were told by Symantec support to remove Spybot-S&D because of not existing incompatibilities, and no chance to solve this peacefully, we found this to be the only way to inform our customers that there is no incompatibility, and Symantec can't prove any contrary to what their support documents and people state.
http://safer-networking.org/en/news/2006-01-07.html


Animal wrote:
Use quote tags as per forum rules or your posts will be removed and you will receive a warning for spam.
Indyan
Interesting tricks.I havent seen them before.
http://www.connectedinternet.co.uk/blog/_archives/2006/1/12/1658713.html
Generic Superhero
Indyan wrote:
Back in April 2005, Norton Antivirus by Symantec already had a false positive about one of our products. We couldn't get Symantec to react at first, we wrote an article about that on our website. After that, Symantec could suddenly react, and told us that it would be a question of honor to deal with such things without any publicity. They removed the false positive, and we removed their name from that news article.

Now, we have received more and more complaints over the year that Symantec would recommend to its customers to deinstall Spybot-S&D, because it would corrupt Norton Ghost images. We finally found their knowledgebase article about it, and were a bit surprised to see that while Symantec wants to keep any bad words about their own software out of the public, and deal with it honorably, they have no problems to post wrong facts about the products of their competition on their website without even getting into any contact about this so-called incompability.

Since we wanted to play fair, we gave them a full week to show us evidence that Spybot-S&D would be corrupting Norton Ghost images before we would publically announce this. Mr. Guido Sanchidrian, product marketing manager of Symantec, appeared offended when we told him that his mentioning of honorable non-public discussions in case of incompatibilities seemed to be a farce, but he told us they would take this very seriously and answer on the last day of the given timeframe.

Well, this time is over now, without any explanation why Spybot-S&D would corrupt Norton Ghost images, and I had to threat to sue them with legal action for compensation to get them to remove the name Spybot-S&D.

Still, further promises from Mr. Ingenpass from Symantec to deal with this within the first week of the new year passed without his promised explanation about this incompatibility.

With a second false accusation this year, and no valid explanation given, we can only assume that libel is Symantec's way of trying to force anti-spyware competition out of the market.

We apologize for dragging this into the public, but with continuing complaints from Spybot-S&D users who were told by Symantec support to remove Spybot-S&D because of not existing incompatibilities, and no chance to solve this peacefully, we found this to be the only way to inform our customers that there is no incompatibility, and Symantec can't prove any contrary to what their support documents and people state.
http://safer-networking.org/en/news/2006-01-07.html


Spybot is one of the best freewares around. Why is Norton trying to defame it? May be because they want people to use their anti-spyware instead of Spybot. Whatever it is, my support goes to Spybot -- a freeware dedicated to the most beautiful girl on earth!
kansloos
I guess there plan won't work, people wil just search another program instead of Symantec's programs and maybe in somecases it will work...
Kd527
Yeah Spybot S&D is pretty nice. Although I'm now free from windoze and the spyware, but when I happen to be on windoze then that's what I got (along with some others).
InjunMick
I for one say the heck with symantec, mcaffee and the lot of over priced software that want to take over your system and the industry it seams.
Good luck and I hope you win.

InjunMick
James007
@Indyan: Use [quote]-tags the next time please Smile even if you mention the source.
@Kd527: Remove the danasoft-picture from your sig. The rules do not allow such sigs.
------

Tnx for the news Cool
Related topics
What did Bush lie about?
how to get this sony JUNK off my computer
Beam weapons, a new way of warfare?
Google and Static Ip's - Does Google Penalize Shared Ip's?
"Sensational" Sherri passes away
Are Americans stupid?
Children of Jihad
Babies Education
What does God do all day?
Do you think creationism should be regarded as science?
Those "Evil" Healthcare Companies...
Climate change and politics
Unhappiness with Obama?
Should 9/11 Trials be heard in Civilian or Military Courts?
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Computers -> Software

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.