even when under attack did he have call the white
even when under attack did he have call the white
Here's a timeline of the event:
There are some who say that they were running guns
I see that after their government shutdown finally ended, the GOP started talking about Benghazi again right away. It's like they don't care about their job at all, don't want to manage the government, and are obsessed with their fake scandals that no one believes except their brainwashed followers. http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/10/17/with-shutdown-over-fox-is-back-on-benghazi/196477
What exactly was faked about what happened in Benghazi?
Since it's obviously a faked scandal, then something that happened there must have been faked.
What's fake is the political scandal part. It was never a political scandal, but FOX and the RW entertainment complex have pushed it as a political scandal, harder than they push the War on Christmas. And even though it's been thoroughly investigated and the "scandal" debunked, they haven't stopped the propaganda to this day:
Yes, we all know the attack was caused by outrage over the poor production standards of a youtube video. Yeah, that's the ticket.
More timelines on what happened during and afterwards:
Now that the thorough investigation is done does anyone have the current info on what the president was doing during the attack? I heard so many versions, he was in the situation room taking the lead, he handed it off to someone and went back to sleep, nobody told him about it, he wasn't around, he said something like "Do whatever it takes" while the military in the area and the guys fighting back who died were told to stand down, he wasn't asleep, etc.
Since the seemingly endless monkey-trial investigation found there was no scandal at all, why don't you do some minimum research and answer the question for yourself?
The monkey trial might have ended a while ago
The results of my minimum research:
He had some free time that night
He didn't do anything specific, but was informed
He ordered subordinates to "make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to."
He could have skipped 6 days of intelligence briefings beforehand
He just watched it and was on the phone to his secretary of state and Netanyahu for an hour
There's some doubt that the results of the thorough investigation are really thorough
If this is the report of the thorough investigation, it doesn't seem to mention the actions of the president
A little more on what happened that night.
Has anybody been held accountable for the dangerously incompetent response to the attacks? My minimal research effort has found no names so far.
I'm sorry that you wasted so much time in your search by going to berzerk hate sites like "Atlas Shrugs" and right wing newspapers.
The Congressional investigation debunked every claim that started the investigation in the first place--that's why it went nowhere after it was done.
Benghazi was an attack ON the USA--not a scandal BY the USA.
Harping on it is just the result of the insane right wing BS machine that brought us the government shutdown, that brought us all the disasters of the Bush administration, which make any mistake of the Obama administration look microscopic.
I wasted so much time on google's right wing search results that took me to all the thousands of crazy right wing berserk hate sites. Seems like they were the only ones that tried in pure hate to report about the president's actions that night... I can only assume it was all imagined in their twisted minds. It's a fact that only the berserk left wing hate sites and newspapers contain credible propaganda about the glorious leader. Obama is pretty much continuing where Bush left off. Obama ≅ Romney, Obama ≅ McCain, Obama ≅ Bush family. The democrats and most of the republicans are pretty much on the same side feigning opposition. When Democrats are in power the Republicans manufacture scandals every week. When Republicans are in power the Democrats manufacture scandals every week. It's the game they keep playing.
Some or all of that berserk right wing "60 Minutes" hate report on Benghazi has been debunked
Pretending it wasn't the result of some shred of incompetence somewhere in the chain of command is just the result of the bigger, better, and meaner left wing BS machine.
I don't quite get your point. The 60 minutes show is retracting and apologizing for its show, which is exactly my point. Was there a shred of incompetence somewhere in the tragic incident? Yes, it's possible. But look at what the RW did-- turn an attack on our country into their own political attack on our president. They basically did the post-publicity stage of the attack, in effect helping the terrorists.
My other point about the Atlas Shrugged website was just: if we want to learn about space travel, we don't go to a UFO conspiracy website. Right?
You couldn't have said it better. Blaming the president for a terrorist attack is giving terrorists what they want. You also have to consider that such attacks are not uncommon in unstable areas. For example Iran's embassy in Beirut was attacked just recently.
Here is a list of attacks on US diplomatic facilities further reflecting the unsuitability and hate in these dangerous war torn areas. Benghazi was simply nothing new. Such attacks have been occurring for decades.