FRIHOSTFORUMSSEARCHFAQTOSBLOGSCOMPETITIONS
You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!


Top 10 British Insults





jwellsy
Here's an interesting collection.

Quote:

In March last year I published a list of Barack Obama’s biggest insults against America’s biggest ally Great Britain, during his time in office. A lot of water has flowed under the bridge since then, including the Gulf oil spill and the White House’s campaign against BP, the now infamous Obama-Sarkozy press conference earlier this year, and the release by Wikileaks of US government documents revealing the Obama administration had betrayed Britain in order to appease the Russians over the New START Treaty.

In honour of President Obama’s state visit to Britain this week, here’s an updated and revised list, as a reminder to readers of the president’s less than stellar track record when it comes to US-British relations. The US president will no doubt be careful not to offend his hosts when he travels to London, and he will receive a warm welcome from the Queen and the Prime Minister, as any American president would. But the prospect of an embarrassing diplomatic gaffe or insensitive remark cannot be ruled out from a world leader whose administration has all too often specialised in them. As I noted in my original piece:

Without a shadow of a doubt, Barack Obama has been the most anti-British president in modern American history. The Special Relationship has been significantly downgraded, and at times humiliated under his presidency, which has displayed a shocking disregard for America’s most important partner and strategic ally.

There are a multitude of reasons for President Obama’s dismissive approach to the UK, and here are a few: an obsession with engaging and appeasing America’s enemies rather than cultivating allies; personal animosity towards Britain because of his grandfather’s role as a Mau Mau supporter in 1950’s colonial Kenya; Democrat resentment over British support for the Bush Administration over Iraq; left-wing disdain for the idea of Anglo-American exceptionalism and world leadership; support for supranational institutions such as the European Union over the supremacy of the nation state.

1. Siding with Argentina over the Falklands

For sheer offensiveness it’s hard to beat the Obama administration’s brazen support for Argentina’s call for UN-brokered negotiations over the sovereignty of the Falklands, despite the fact that 255 British servicemen laid down their lives to restore British rule over the Islands after they were brutally invaded in 1982. In a March 2010 press conference in Buenos Aires with President Cristina Kirchner, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave Argentina a huge propaganda coup by emphatically backing the position of the Péronist regime.

In June last year, Mrs. Clinton slapped Britain in face again by signing on to an Organisation of American States (OAS) resolution calling for negotiations over the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands, a position which is completely unacceptable to Great Britain. To add insult to injury, the Obama administration has insisted on using the Argentine term “Malvinas” to describe the Islands in yet another sop to Buenos Aires.

2. Calling France America’s strongest ally

In January this year, President Obama held a joint press conference at the White House with his French counterpart, literally gushing with praise for Washington’s new-found Gallic friends, declaring: “We don’t have a stronger friend and stronger ally than Nicolas Sarkozy, and the French people.” As I noted at the time:

Quite what the French have done to merit this kind of high praise from the US president is difficult to fathom, and if the White House means what it says this represents an extraordinary sea change in US foreign policy. Nicolas Sarkozy is a distinctly more pro-American president than any of his predecessors, and has been an important ally over issues such as Iran and the War on Terror. But to suggest that Paris and not London is Washington’s strongest partner is simply ludicrous.

These kinds of presidential statements matter. No US president in modern times has described France as America’s closest ally, and such a remark is not only factually wrong but also insulting to Britain, not least coming just a few years after the French famously knifed Washington in the back over the war in Iraq.

3. Downgrading the Special Relationship

Barack Obama very rarely refers to the Special Relationship, and has hardly even mentioned Britain in a major policy speech, either before or since taking office. The Anglo-American alliance is barely a blip on Obama’s teleprompter screen, and he acts as though it simply does not exist. The Special Relationship has also been largely erased from the official lexicon of the State Department, and is barely used by US officials in London. Despite being America’s only major reliable ally when the chips are down, London is now treated in Washington as though it were the same as any other European power, albeit less charitably than either Paris or Berlin.

4. Supporting a federal Europe and undercutting British sovereignty

The Obama administration’s relentless and wrongheaded support for the creation of a federal Europe, from backing the Treaty of Lisbon to the European Security and Defence Policy, is a slap in the face for the principle of national sovereignty in Europe. British sovereignty is non-negotiable, and Obama’s willingness to undermine it is both insulting to Britain and self-defeating for the United States.

While the Bush Administration was divided over Europe, the Obama team is ardently euro-federalist. Hillary Clinton described the Lisbon Treaty as “a major milestone in our world’s history”, and in an interview with The Irish Times in 2009 stated: “I believe [political integration is] in Europe’s interest and I believe that is in the United States’ interest because we want a strong Europe.” And in May last year, Vice President Joe Biden described Brussels as the “capital of the free world.”

And the US Ambassador to London, Louis Susman, has warned Britain that “all key issues must run through Europe.” According to a report by The Parliament.com, in a private meeting with British MEPs at an event in the European Parliament in January, Susman called for a stronger British commitment to the EU, emphatically warning against British withdrawal:

I want to stress that the UK needs to remain in the EU. The US does not want to see Britain’s role in the EU diminished in any way. The message I want to convey today is that we want to see a stronger EU, but also a stronger British participation within the EU. This is crucial if, together, we are going to meet all the global challenges facing us, including climate change and security.

5. Betraying Britain to appease Moscow over the New START Treaty

In February, The Daily Telegraph broke a major story with damaging implications for the Special Relationship, revealing that Washington “secretly agreed to give the Russians sensitive information on Britain’s nuclear deterrent to persuade them to sign a key treaty.” According to The Telegraph report:

Information about every Trident missile the US supplies to Britain will be given to Russia as part of an arms control deal signed by President Barack Obama next week. Defence analysts claim the agreement risks undermining Britain’s policy of refusing to confirm the exact size of its nuclear arsenal.

A series of classified messages sent to Washington by US negotiators show how information on Britain’s nuclear capability was crucial to securing Russia’s support for the “New START” deal. Although the treaty was not supposed to have any impact on Britain, the leaked cables show that Russia used the talks to demand more information about the UK’s Trident missiles, which are manufactured and maintained in the US.

Washington lobbied London in 2009 for permission to supply Moscow with detailed data about the performance of UK missiles. The UK refused, but the US agreed to hand over the serial numbers of Trident missiles it transfers to Britain.

6. Placing a “boot on the throat” of BP

The Obama administration’s relentless campaign against Britain’s largest company in the wake of Gulf oil spill was one of the most damaging episodes in US-UK relations in recent years, with 64 percent of Britons agreeing that the president’s handling of the issue had harmed the partnership between the two countries according to a YouGov poll. The White House’s aggressive trashing of BP, including a threat to put a “boot on the throat” of the oil giant, helped wipe out about half its share value, directly impacting the pensions of 18 million Britons. This led to a furious backlash in the British press, with even London mayor and long-time Obama admirer Boris Johnson demanding an end to “anti-British rhetoric, buck-passing and name-calling”.

7. Throwing Churchill out of the Oval Office

It is hard to think of a more derogatory message to send to the British people within days of taking office than to fling a bust of Winston Churchill out of the Oval Office and send it packing back to the British Embassy – not least as it was a loaned gift from Britain to the United States as a powerful display of solidarity in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. Obviously, public diplomacy is not a concept that carries much weight in the current White House, and nor apparently is common sense.

8. DVDs for the Prime Minister

Readers of this blog will know I’m no fan of Gordon Brown, but whatever one thinks of his third-rate premiership, Brown traveled abroad not as a private individual but as the leader of America’s closest ally. He represented 61 million Britons including the Armed Forces, as well as a huge amount of British trade and investment with the United States. He was however treated shabbily when he visited the White House in March 2009, and denied a Rose Garden press conference as well as a dinner. To cap it all, the decision to send him home with an assortment of 25 DVDs ranging from Toy Story to The Wizard of Oz – which couldn’t even be played in the UK – was a breathtaking display of diplomatic ineptitude that would have shamed the protocol office of an impoverished Third World country.

9. Insulting words from the State Department

The mocking views of a senior State Department official following Gordon Brown’s embarrassing reception at the White House in March last year says it all:

There’s nothing special about Britain. You’re just the same as the other 190 countries in the world. You shouldn’t expect special treatment.

One would have thought that this kind of monumentally shallow insult would have resulted in at least a formal apology and a reprimand for the official involved, but unfortunately Obama administration apologies are strictly reserved for the French and assorted enemies of the United States.

10. Undermining British influence in NATO

Despite Nicolas Sarkozy’s distinctly unflattering opinion of Barack Obama, the US president has gone to great lengths to appease French interests, even going as far as apologising to the French people in Strasbourg for hurting their feelings over the war in Iraq. The Obama administration has also done its best to give Paris a lead role in the NATO alliance at Britain’s expense, granting it one of two supreme NATO command positions – Allied Command Transformation (ACT). This, despite the fact that France has for decades been ambivalent and obstructionist over NATO, and is failing to carry its weight in Afghanistan.


http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100088961/barack-obama-top-ten-insults-against-britain-2011-edition/
deanhills
I wonder whether the BP "offensive" had really been that bad, and something of lip servie. Maybe it was just for public consumption to make them feel better for that moment as soon after it seemed to have become business as usual. BP is still drilling in the Gulf. And it would seem the Government has almost forgotten all of his threats at that time.
Navigator
So the blogger is saying that Obama should've been more kind to BP? Pulheeeze. I personally believe that he was too soft, none is in jail for that crime against mother nature and while the ecosystem of the whole world is at risk the blogger is complaining that obama tried to put the "boot on the throat of BP", thats beyond comprehension.
Bikerman
Well, since I am a Brit, I think I'll respond to this 'blog'.
1. Siding with Argentina over the Falklands
Untrue. Calls for a negotiated settlement are quite reasonable. What is not reasonable is for the UK to hold on to a small island which it has no real claim to, and which is thousands of miles away. The matter should have been negotiated years ago - and many of my countrymen would agree with the US call.

2. Calling France America’s strongest ally.
So what? ALL US Presidents lie about the special relationship with the UK. Never existed - not even in WW2. The US does what is in its national interest. That means that it KNOWS that Germany is the most important ally in Europe. The fact that Obama butters-up the French, when French officials are visiting, is quite normal behaviour for politicians.

3. Downgrading the Special Relationship
See above. It is also untrue - Obama has mentioned the special relationship many times.

4. Supporting a federal Europe and undercutting British sovereignty
Obama simply follows the same policy that EVERY US President since the war has followed. The US wants a federated Europe, and always has done, so that they can 'leave us to it' without worrying about us starting some war - as, it must be said, has been our rather regrettable habbit.

5. Betraying Britain to appease Moscow over the New START Treaty
Pulleease! This is crap. The arms control treaty requires all sorts of details and the UK government knew all about it.

6. Placing a “boot on the throat” of BP
The only claim that has any merit - and it isn't really THAT meritorious. I think Obama DID make a mistake with BP - particularly since it is a major contributer to the US economy. One can hardly blame him for getting a bit mad with BP, however, and they WERE incompetent.

7. Throwing Churchill out of the Oval Office
Groan. Churchil was thrown out of office by THE BRITISH PEOPLE straight after the war. They were smart enough to realise that Churchill was a one-trick pony. A good war leader and a disaster otherwise.

8. DVDs for the Prime Minister
Obama would not have chosen the gift - that would have been the responsibility of the US State Department officials. It was also a 'right call' if the motivation was to distance themselves from a leader on the way out and thereby pave the way for relations with the opposition, soon to take power.

9. Insulting words from the State Department
Real words, more like. The notion that Obama is responsible for every remark by a government official is so stupid that it reveals the blogger is a moron.

10. Undermining British influence in NATO
Same 'facts' as number 2 - appeasing france. I think that, given the terrible relations between the US and France (remember 'cheese eating surrender monkeys'?) that Obama is simply trying to restore some sort of normality to the relationship.

Really, this is desperate stuff. The blogger is clearly a right wing moron who would post anything in an attempt to discredit Obama. The fact that you find it 'interesting' should give you pause for thought.
deanhills
Navigator wrote:
So the blogger is saying that Obama should've been more kind to BP? Pulheeeze. I personally believe that he was too soft, none is in jail for that crime against mother nature and while the ecosystem of the whole world is at risk the blogger is complaining that obama tried to put the "boot on the throat of BP", thats beyond comprehension.
You've said it much better than I have. How on earth can the US approve drilling permits to BP when the Gulf is in in a worse state than it has been before. Anyway, I guess that is a good topic for another thread. It's upsetting though. Politicians memories are probably as short as the time limitation on contributions to their campaigns or who knows maybe pockets as well.
Navigator
deanhills wrote:
Navigator wrote:
So the blogger is saying that Obama should've been more kind to BP? Pulheeeze. I personally believe that he was too soft, none is in jail for that crime against mother nature and while the ecosystem of the whole world is at risk the blogger is complaining that obama tried to put the "boot on the throat of BP", thats beyond comprehension.
You've said it much better than I have. How on earth can the US approve drilling permits to BP when the Gulf is in in a worse state than it has been before. Anyway, I guess that is a good topic for another thread. It's upsetting though. Politicians memories are probably as short as the time limitation on contributions to their campaigns or who knows maybe pockets as well.


Wait there is more, after being the culprit of the worst ecologic disaster since man can recall history, its been business as usual for BP

http://www.news24.com/Africa/News/Libya-going-ahead-with-BP-drilling-deal-20100627


This is not offshore drilling, but still interesting

http://www.ordons.com/asia/middle-east/2893-bp-launches-drilling-tenders-for-iraqs-largest-oil-field.html

Of course, someone at the UK government was angry that their patrons would loose some money (as if they had lost a lot compensating the victims of the Gulf)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7921405/Britain-slams-unconstitutional-plan-to-ban-BP-from-drilling-in-US.html

And after someone was speaking of a 7 year ban for BP offshore drilling in the US, it took a lot less for them to get their business back:

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_world_business/view/1120460/1/.html
Hello_World
Quote:
2. Calling France America’s strongest ally

In January this year, President Obama held a joint press conference at the White House with his French counterpart, literally gushing with praise for Washington’s new-found Gallic friends, declaring: “We don’t have a stronger friend and stronger ally than Nicolas Sarkozy, and the French people.” As I noted at the time:

...

These kinds of presidential statements matter. No US president in modern times has described France as America’s closest ally, and such a remark is not only factually wrong but also insulting to Britain, not least coming just a few years after the French famously knifed Washington in the back over the war in Iraq.



WHAT!?! I'm pretty sure he said this to Australia too... And we are way better allies to US than France. [/quote]

I don't think he is so good at foreign relations. He has also cancelled trips to Aus numerous times. Insulting. At least Australia is on his map. Bush was standing in front of a world map once, talking about the war, and Australia wasn't even on it!!!!!!!!!!! Australia is, like, a LARGE country.

I don't think it is an insult to Britian that they critisised BP. I think they were big pussies and should have dragged BP over the rocks. BP was disgusting. US should have sued it til there was nothing left, and banned it forever from US. People should have been jailed. And people should have been allowed to take photos of it.
deanhills
Hello_World wrote:
I don't think it is an insult to Britian that they critisised BP. I think they were big pussies and should have dragged BP over the rocks. BP was disgusting. US should have sued it til there was nothing left, and banned it forever from US. People should have been jailed. And people should have been allowed to take photos of it.
I totally agree with you there in spades.

I also agree that depending on the flavour of the day and who Obama is visiting next, or whom he wants to impress most, his "strongest ally" would vary all of the time.
Related topics
Your top 10 favourite songs!!!! Post here
Top 10 Rock Bands
[Música] Top 10 de Bandas
Whats your views on alcohol?
Whats Your Top 10 Desktop Applications
your top 10
Top 10 ++Jean-luc Godard
top 10 frishost sites
Escribe tu Top 10 de Canciones
As 10 maiores personalidades do pais
Post your top 10 movies of all time
Post your top 10 albums of all time
Top 10 bizarre experiments
TOP 10
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Lifestyle and News -> Politics

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.