You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!

Question concerning warnings?

Are warnings - points against a member? I have recieved to date (2) warnings that I feel were not warranted. The last warning deleted my post and stated that my membership could be removed in the future.

Is there anyway I can 'protest' this or should I even bother?

Although, I accept the fact that mod in question is the mod and agree with the tos rules do not agree that the tos has been applied correctly by the mod and that because the mod is also a poster in the forum, the reason for the actions on the part of the mod has become personal.

I can stop posting in that part of the forum.

Suggestions? Advise?

Ghost Rider103
Warning are not necessarily "points" against members to "remove their membership".

It depends on a number of things. Some users of course won't even get a chance to even take a look at the warning issued because they are banned immediately. This is of course only in a serious case; like severe spamming, hacking, etc.

Though you may have two warnings, it doesn't necessarily mean if you get a 3rd warning or even a 4th you will automatically be banned. There are different levels of warnings. If you have two major warnings but they are worked out, and then you get a warning for your signature being too large, chances are you are not going to get banned just because your signature was accidentally too large.
You can protest, but I must say as far as the warning is concerned, we as a moderator team feel the moderator is right in doing so (and we are not involved in these/your topics).

A repeated offence will lead to a ban.

I hope I've cleared things out for you.
James007 wrote:
You can protest, but I must say as far as the warning is concerned, we as a moderator team feel the moderator is right in doing so (and we are not involved in these/your topics).

A repeated offence will lead to a ban.

I hope I've cleared things out for you.
Dear Mr Bond!

Which one are you?

Very Happy - - - love you name, cute!

Thank you both James007 and Ghost Rider103 for your replies. Please know that I do appreciate them! They were very helpful however I still not clear in regards to the idea of protest.

Is it correct to say that there is no (at present) means of protest available to frihost members?
In plain words when a moderator makes a decision, that decision is final and it is not to be discussed?

Did you mean, it is respected when a member protests a ruling (say by posting why they thought it was a wrong decision) or protesting is not appreciated in that members should accept moderation without protest?

I am also not clear James if you are speaking on behalf of a team in that you actually discuss and vote on things as a group or you are just making a general statement, "like moderators do not get involved in topics?"

Thank you for your help. Sincerely, I am trying to understand the working of the board so that I can post in harmony with it.
All team members are able to comment on each warning and that is exactly what we did. You can use the warning topic to ask questions about your warning to the team (not only to the moderator who issued the warning).

Banning decisions are made by our team administrators so you cannot be kicked out 'on personal grounds'. Again, we are able to vote about bans as a team. If you do not agree with a moderator's decision, the team will always be consulted for a second opinion, it is the way we handle every warning.

If a moderator is not willing to listen to your 'defence' (by not asking a colleague to step in), you could send a personal message to another team member. All team members have either an orange or a green colour in the members list and are more than willing to help you out at any time.
Since I am the mod in question then let me reiterate and expand:
I do not give out warnings without good reason and, apart from routine dealings with obvious spammers, I normally discuss any such warning with the other moderators in the mods forum - as I did on this occasion.

I have no issue with anyone challenging my decisions and if they are not satisfied with my response then, as James has said, they are free to pm another moderator - although I will almost certainly have already posted in the mods forum with a summary. As a matter of etiquette I would expect them to first raise the concern in the AWIT thread, before seeking further advice, but we don't insist on etiquette in the TOS, so there is no 'moderating' issue raised.

The posting in question was dealt with in the 'normal' way - it was moved to an area which is invisible to normal members but visible to the moderators - we call it the 'spamcan'. The posting is therefore freely available for any mod to look at, and there is no question of me doing otherwise. All above board and according to the TOS.

PS - I said that repeated offences could lead to a ban, not as a threat - I have no power to impose a ban - but as information to be considered. I normally include such a reminder to anyone who being warned for the second, third (or whatever) time, so that they are fully aware of the situation and will not get 'caught out' by suddenly finding they can no longer access the system.
Thank you again for taking the time to answer my questions. It has made me aware of how the system works and want to be very careful in the future to ensure that all the tos requirements are met. I do appreciate your support.
Related topics
Question concerning accounts
My Harry Potter site
Can anyone help a beginner?
Do we need Religions?
Velikovsky: Worlds In Collision
Starting with Derrida
How Faith Are You In God??
Safely shutting down an external drive
Make Warnings Public
Question Concerning Every Markup Language
be Yourself ask questions
Dual Linux WinXP boot question
Stats on Religiousity for the US
Celebrating death
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Support and Web Hosting -> Frihost Support

© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.