|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bush and Iraq
few days ago the majioroty of Arab People who lives in US agreed that George W. Bush is More dangerouse than Ben laden.
For me I believe that Both of them are danguerouse and thinking about their own Benifits.....
For me I believe that Both of them are danguerouse and thinking about their own Benifits.....
I agree!!!
I think US has adopted the policy "kill the enemy when its weak" and not giving it any chance to become stronger and launch attack.
I think US has adopted the policy "kill the enemy when its weak" and not giving it any chance to become stronger and launch attack.
| raedzaro wrote: |
| few days ago the majioroty of Arab People who lives in US agreed that George W. Bush is More dangerouse than Ben laden.
For me I believe that Both of them are danguerouse and thinking about their own Benifits..... |
I also think Bush is really more dangerous than Bin Laden. I have SERIOUS concerns if this bin laden ever existed and is not something made by CIA. Let's say he is real and also responsible for 9/11 attacks that killed 2000 people. Bush's invasion to Iraq and Afghanistan killed more than this of american troops and 100 times of people in these countries.
Is terrorism eradicated? Can anyone tell me if the world is at least A BIT safer than 2001??? I would say NO! WAR in middle east will build up rage and anger and a new generation of US enemies will grow. This means more terrorism and violance.
Bush is a REAL threat to humanity and peace. He is something like Hitler (considering the time difference). Just listen to one of his talks to the American nation and compare it to Hitlers lectures for Nazis.
| raedzaro wrote: |
| few days ago the majioroty of Arab People. |
Please cite a CREDIBLE source
Simply put. No. But what I'm really implying is, Not yet. Is the world safer after the invasion of Iraq and the security measures and terrorism crackdowns? Perhaps, but more probably, no. Through Bush's order to invade Iraq, several thousands of innocent civilians have died. Though most are from insurgents, those civilians have been targetted in retaliation (I think thats a typo) to the invasion of Iraq.
Would these kind of attacks on civilians have not occurred if the invasion did not take place? Most likely. But almost certainly, not as many.
And as for 'samh' likening Bush to Hitler, I'd say not that much. Though Bush is known to mislead the American Public (Deliberately or accidently I don't know).
Would these kind of attacks on civilians have not occurred if the invasion did not take place? Most likely. But almost certainly, not as many.
And as for 'samh' likening Bush to Hitler, I'd say not that much. Though Bush is known to mislead the American Public (Deliberately or accidently I don't know).
I agree
many people died in the war
especially the common ppl
many people died in the war
especially the common ppl
Sorry, you must follow the rules of the forum... quote the article, link to a source, and offer an opinion.
-locked-
-locked-
 |