FRIHOSTFORUMSSEARCHFAQTOSBLOGSCOMPETITIONS
You are invited to Log in or Register a free Frihost Account!


How do you define racism?





HalfBloodPrince
Earlier today, something happened to me that hasn't ever really happened to me in my life. My dad and I were in the car driving home, and stopped at a traffic light. We were in the middle lane and a middle aged white woman was in her car behind us. She suddenly started honking at us for no apparent reason; I thought maybe she wanted to squeeze into the right side lane to take a turn? Eventually she gets to the lane beside us (still stopped at that red light) and pulls down her window.

Don't you f**king asswipes know when to move your f**king brown asses?! Get the f**k out of our country you dirty f**king foreigners! And go back to the f**king hole you came from! *middle finger*

There was more, but pretty much the above reworded. Now had my dad not been there I would certainly have engaged in a royal Jerry Springer style cuss-off with that b*tch, but I somehow managed to keep my mouth shut because I think my dad would have been more disappointed in me for stooping down to her level.

Ironically, my skin is either the same color as hers or lighter, so racism doesn't just come down to skin color, does it? I'm Pakistani (I've never lived in Pakistan though) and this happened in Canada. Before today I'd never felt like I was the victim of any sort of racism, but now I think I finally understand what it might feel like to people who have to experience much more serious types of racism (when things get violent).

Have you ever had an experience like this? Is this really racism?
Helios
It's the lighter sort of racism. The bad stuff is when you're in a dark alley and a bunch of "locals" come to teach you a lesson of their country's history, so to speak.

Happened to me in foreign countries, after saying that I'm Jewish. I look completely european, but god forbid if I visit a country and say that I'm from Israel to the wrong person...

Needless to say that I lost most of my family more than 60 years ago because of racism...
miacps
Wow, that sucks. Most people would consider that racist (from what you've told us it was completely unprovoked so it sounds like she just has hatred for other races). I think its kind of hard to identify "true" racism so I usually just categorize these kinds of people into the much more clear status of "****** moron".

Just curious, which state do you live in?
Bannik
well is that really racism, i mean maybe she has serious road rage, one of the most annoying things ppl say too me is that i am racist (i swear a lot and a lot about their race when angry) but I am not actually racist, i just think that if you are gonna swear at someone you should go all out and hold nothing back.....

is it really racism if someone is angry, could just be the anger
liljp617
Bannik wrote:
is it really racism if someone is angry, could just be the anger


If the anger leads to racist comments/slurs, how is it not racism? And why would being angry be justification for it?
miacps
liljp617 wrote:
Bannik wrote:
is it really racism if someone is angry, could just be the anger


If the anger leads to racist comments/slurs, how is it not racism? And why would being angry be justification for it?


Well I think it depends on the situation. If some guy is verbally abusing you and you call him a racial slur in retaliation, its not really racism. However if you're driving down the street and start screaming racial slurs at people in another car unprovoked... well, you see where I'm going with this.
liljp617
miacps wrote:
liljp617 wrote:
Bannik wrote:
is it really racism if someone is angry, could just be the anger


If the anger leads to racist comments/slurs, how is it not racism? And why would being angry be justification for it?


Well I think it depends on the situation. If some guy is verbally abusing you and you call him a racial slur in retaliation, its not really racism. However if you're driving down the street and start screaming racial slurs at people in another car unprovoked... well, you see where I'm going with this.


Respectfully disagree. Demeaning someone based solely on their ethnic background is racism. The situation doesn't matter to me. I don't think the context of the situation, whether it be a fight/debate/mindlessly screaming at each other, makes any difference in what the term racism means. I don't see why the term itself would change meaning in the event of someone yelling at you.

I also don't fully understand the "really racism" idea. Where is the line drawn? Who gets to draw it? Why are some things "really racism" and others are just racism?
HalfBloodPrince
By "really racism" I didn't mean it as in "really good" or "just good", I meant "really" as in "truly" (as in "is it truly racism?"). Hope that clears it up. But I agree with you, the situation doesn't matter; if you yell a racial slur at someone in a mindless tantrum it still means you had those racial ideas in your mind about the person, therefore it's racism.
Hogwarts
HalfBloodPrince wrote:
if you yell a racial slur at someone in a mindless tantrum it still means you had those racial ideas in your mind about the person, therefore it's racism

Does it? That's not necessarily true, they may simply have been trying to get under the person's skin.
miacps
liljp617 wrote:
Demeaning someone based solely on their ethnic background is racism.


I agree, key word solely.

liljp617 wrote:
The situation doesn't matter to me. I don't think the context of the situation, whether it be a fight/debate/mindlessly screaming at each other, makes any difference in what the term racism means. I don't see why the term itself would change meaning in the event of someone yelling at you.


If someone initiates a verbal abuse contest, the name of the game is offend/hurt with words. I think racial slurs used in this situation are just a way of being effective without putting much thought into what you're saying. In this situation, I don't think it necessarily reflects the user's actual ideas on race.

An example would be if two guys get into a fight and one calls the other a fag. The intention is to offend the opponent and doesn't actually give any insight into the users ideas about homosexuals. If its some guy standing on a street corner with a sign that says "all fags deserve to die", then their prejudice is a lot more clear.

liljp617 wrote:
I also don't fully understand the "really racism" idea. Where is the line drawn? Who gets to draw it? Why are some things "really racism" and others are just racism?


"Real racism", for lack of a better term, has to do with intent. Since most of the time you can't really know what another person's intent is, it can be a gray area.

The same can be said about comedy. If someone makes a racist joke, it can sometimes be hard to tell whether their intent was malicious or not.

Just to be clear, I'm not condoning the use of bigoted terms out of anger. But if I hear them being used, I can't automatically conclude that the user is indeed a bigot.
liljp617
miacps wrote:
If someone initiates a verbal abuse contest, the name of the game is offend/hurt with words. I think racial slurs used in this situation are just a way of being effective without putting much thought into what you're saying. In this situation, I don't think it necessarily reflects the user's actual ideas on race.

An example would be if two guys get into a fight and one calls the other a fag. The intention is to offend the opponent and doesn't actually give any insight into the users ideas about homosexuals. If its some guy standing on a street corner with a sign that says "all fags deserve to die", then their prejudice is a lot more clear.


I agree that it may not reflect their overall ideas on other races. That single occurrence may be the only time in their life that they use a racial slur. I'm not proposing we judge an entire person's life and outlook towards others on one event.

However, in that specific "verbal abuse contest" they're using racial slurs, the pure intention being to demean their "opponent" based on ethnic background. In that particular instance, they are a racist. They're "guilty" of racism.

In your example, if the person who got called a 'fag' was a homosexual, then the person who used the word is being prejudiced at that point in time, regardless of their overall outlook towards homosexuality. The prejudice isn't "less prejudiced" even if the person using the word 'fag' is an avid supporter for equal rights for homosexuals. It remains prejudice, because the intent is to demean based on, in this case, sexual orientation.

*I think it would be easier to discuss this subject if we stuck to the topic of racism, rather than branching out into all areas of prejudice*

miacps wrote:
"Real racism", for lack of a better term, has to do with intent. Since most of the time you can't really know what another person's intent is, it can be a gray area.

The same can be said about comedy. If someone makes a racist joke, it can sometimes be hard to tell whether their intent was malicious or not.

Just to be clear, I'm not condoning the use of bigoted terms out of anger. But if I hear them being used, I can't automatically conclude that the user is indeed a bigot.


If the determining factor is intent, then aren't the situations outlined above racism/prejudice? You said the goal of "verbal abuse contest" is to offend/hurt your opponent with words. To me, racism includes purposely using racial slurs to cut down, demean, offend, or hurt an individual based on their ethnicity. It seems that racial slurs used in this verbal abuse contest are words of racism, in my opinion.
deanhills
Bannik wrote:
well is that really racism, i mean maybe she has serious road rage, one of the most annoying things ppl say too me is that i am racist (i swear a lot and a lot about their race when angry) but I am not actually racist, i just think that if you are gonna swear at someone you should go all out and hold nothing back.....

is it really racism if someone is angry, could just be the anger
Laughing Laughing Laughing You must be living dangerously if this is your philosophy Bannik! Could easily get you killed. Rage vented to hurt other people usually has a very certain reaction, and in the wrong company it can easily lead to taking out a gun and shooting you? I have to agree with the main posting however, not reacting to the verbal abuse said much more along good things about the victims of the rage, than the person who was raging.
Bikerman
I think the wiki definition is as good as most:
Quote:
Racism is the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.

Now, if we are really going to open this up then we need some honest self-examination.

I was brought up in the UK in the 60s and 70s. Terms like '******', 'wog', 'spic', 'kike' were commonplace - even in the broadcast media. Did this have an effect on me? - of course it did. When skin colour is seen as such an 'important' determinant, you naturally build mental stereotypes around it. This is not unique to race/colour of course - we ALL form impressions of people pretty quickly, and these are based to a large extent on the visual perception of the person. Obviously skin colour is an important distinguishing feature, as is gender, height, 'attractiveness', age etc....
If I want to quickly describe an acquaintance so that someone could recognise them, then the easiest way to narrow them down would be ; gender, skin colour, age, height....and so on.
(That is, of course, because I live in a multi-cultural society. Skin colour wouldn't be much use if everyone I knew was white, black, brown....etc).

Like many people this presents me with a dilemma. I know a bit about the history of racism and my conscious 'self' rejects the doctrine as scientifically flawed and socially and ethically repugnant. All battles against embedded 'isms' (be it sexism, racism, homophobia or whatever) involve trying to swing the public 'ethic' (by which I mean that which is socially 'acceptable'). This leads, I think, to a period of confusion in society where people try to establish new boundaries in language and middle-class liberally inclined people like me find it uncomfortable to refer to skin colour in 'polite' conversation. This is clearly illogical, but true, nonetheless. It is the negative connotations that attach to skin-colour, via stereotypes, that are the problem. I see those connotations diminishing during my lifetime, and I see no reason to think that process will reverse. Who knows, in a few years I might be completely comfortable describing my friend Adrian as 'black' without having to think whether I should be saying 'afro-Caribbean', or 'West Indian' or whatever..I hope so....
BinahZ
I agree with much that has been said here, except the concept that "anger" could be a valid excuse for racist comments.
Being a Jewess who has been called names in my own country, city and neighborhood. I have a understanding of what it feels like.
Sitting in my office on a cool summer evening with the door open to enjoy the breeze, I suddenly heard the word "kike" soon followed by "white power" etc.. You get the idea. I was horrified to be quite honest. A group of young neighborhood boys standing outside were the culprits. Btw most of them are not as european looking as I am, but then I live in a very multi cultural community on the south coast of Massachusetts. Racism, to me is a sign of ignorance, it becomes dangerous when u mix in hatred and feelings of superiority. Racism can be based on color, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation to name a few..all of these things seem to feed into what is nothing more than a validation for hatred of those different than you.
Bannik
deanhills wrote:
Bannik wrote:
well is that really racism, i mean maybe she has serious road rage, one of the most annoying things ppl say too me is that i am racist (i swear a lot and a lot about their race when angry) but I am not actually racist, i just think that if you are gonna swear at someone you should go all out and hold nothing back.....

is it really racism if someone is angry, could just be the anger
Laughing Laughing Laughing You must be living dangerously if this is your philosophy Bannik! Could easily get you killed. Rage vented to hurt other people usually has a very certain reaction, and in the wrong company it can easily lead to taking out a gun and shooting you? I have to agree with the main posting however, not reacting to the verbal abuse said much more along good things about the victims of the rage, than the person who was raging.


its not like i go out and pick fights, i am very mellow you have too do something serious to get me angry (being high half the time doesnt help).

its not in my intrest to be racist, heck my best mate is a nigerian and i make fun of him and his race all the time, its just that i think ppl should mellow out a bit and not care...everyone from black too white have felt the hand of racism at some time in their life....so lets all be a bit more friendly with racism...

what i want too ask is why is it ok for celebreties to be racist (rappers and the word cracker) a lot of them use that word, cracker, which is a racist term no matter how you put it but its ok for some reason....
Bikerman
BinahZ wrote:
Racism can be based on color, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation to name a few..
No, that is not the case. Race is, indeed, a difficult concept to define. Scientifically speaking it is arguable whether the term has any merit at all - it is far too imprecise and subjective to be definable in anything but arbitrary terms.
That being said - racism is the belief that a particular 'race' (however you define that) is inherently superior to others. It should not be confused with other forms of bigotry such as sexism and homophobia - though it is true to say that many racist organisations also have sexist and homophobic 'manifestos'. It may be a valid generalisation that 'many racists are homophobes' but it doesn't follow that homophobia is a type of racism.
Bikerman
Bannik wrote:
what i want too ask is why is it ok for celebreties to be racist (rappers and the word cracker) a lot of them use that word, cracker, which is a racist term no matter how you put it but its ok for some reason....
A couple of points:
a) It is OK for ANYONE to be racist - by which I mean that it is, and should remain, legal. Racism is a 'belief' and the minute you start making beliefs illegal then you are in a place which I do not want to be.
b) 'Cracker' may be interpreted as a racist term in some contexts. The word actually seems to have origin in Elizabethan times when it was used to describe a braggart/story-teller (coming from the middle-English root 'craic' meaning an 'entertaining story'). The word is still used fairly commonly in that context here - 'a good crack', 'what's the crack', 'crack a joke'... etc....
BinahZ
Bikerman wrote:
[That being said - racism is the belief that a particular 'race' (however you define that) is inherently superior to others. It should not be confused with other forms of bigotry such as sexism and homophobia - though it is true to say that many racist organisations also have sexist and homophobic 'manifestos'. It may be a valid generalisation that 'many racists are homophobes' but it doesn't follow that homophobia is a type of racism.


I stand corrected, I was including various forms of bigotry under the racism umbrella Cool
asterobus
Racism is the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.
Bannik
Bikerman wrote:
Bannik wrote:
what i want too ask is why is it ok for celebreties to be racist (rappers and the word cracker) a lot of them use that word, cracker, which is a racist term no matter how you put it but its ok for some reason....
A couple of points:
a) It is OK for ANYONE to be racist - by which I mean that it is, and should remain, legal. Racism is a 'belief' and the minute you start making beliefs illegal then you are in a place which I do not want to be.
b) 'Cracker' may be interpreted as a racist term in some contexts. The word actually seems to have origin in Elizabethan times when it was used to describe a braggart/story-teller (coming from the middle-English root 'craic' meaning an 'entertaining story'). The word is still used fairly commonly in that context here - 'a good crack', 'what's the crack', 'crack a joke'... etc....


A).racism is a belief and I agree we cant make that illegal in any way....but there should be limits of where it is used because some racist beliefs are made from ignorance and I would rather not have such beliefs in lets say schools etc....also these beliefs could affect how you work and what you do at work like a doctor refusing too help a patient on his racist beliefs.

b) true...the origin is pure but the context it is used is still racist - lets say I go around calling black people Mondays, sure its sage and harmless but then I tell you its because "everyone hates Mondays" does that still make Monday and OK term too use?

and no I don't want Mondays illegal.
Bikerman
Bannik wrote:
A).racism is a belief and I agree we cant make that illegal in any way....but there should be limits of where it is used because some racist beliefs are made from ignorance and I would rather not have such beliefs in lets say schools etc....also these beliefs could affect how you work and what you do at work like a doctor refusing too help a patient on his racist beliefs.
There ARE limits. There is a difference between having a belief and acting on those beliefs in an illegal way, or using them to justify illegality.
Turn your 'doctor' argument around - what about the black doctor who refused to treat a racist. Would that be OK?
Quote:
b) true...the origin is pure but the context it is used is still racist - lets say I go around calling black people Mondays, sure its sage and harmless but then I tell you its because "everyone hates Mondays" does that still make Monday and OK term too use?

and no I don't want Mondays illegal.
I'm not sure what your point is. If you don't want to make this an issue of law then what do you want? Most people I know don't use offensive language of that type. There are some who do. I don't condone it - just the opposite. I don't want them locked-up though.
deanhills
Bannik wrote:
its not in my intrest to be racist, heck my best mate is a nigerian and i make fun of him and his race all the time, its just that i think ppl should mellow out a bit and not care...everyone from black too white have felt the hand of racism at some time in their life....so lets all be a bit more friendly with racism...

what i want too ask is why is it ok for celebreties to be racist (rappers and the word cracker) a lot of them use that word, cracker, which is a racist term no matter how you put it but its ok for some reason....
I understand where you are coming from Bannik. Sort of a weird sense of humour amongst friends. Regarding it "being ok" for celebrities to be racist, perhaps it is not ok. This is the first time I heard about the word "cracker", believe it or not! I always thought a "cracker" was someone really excellent at what they were doing, i.e. a crack shot. So now I've learned that cracker can mean five things:
Quote:

Meaning 1
A thin crisp wafer made of flour and water with or without leavening and shortening; unsweetened or semisweet

Meaning 2

A poor white person in the southern United States

Meaning 3
A programmer who 'cracks' (gains unauthorized access to) computers, typically to do malicious things

Meaning 4
Firework consisting of a small explosive charge and fuse in a heavy paper casing


Meaning 5
A party favor consisting of a paper roll (usually containing candy or a small favor) that pops when pulled at both ends


Source: http://www.audioenglish.net/dictionary/cracker.htm

Since this is technically my first introduction to the word as having a meaning along racist lines, I can't get used to it. I would imagine the word can only have a racist meaning in the right kind of company for it. Think
HalfBloodPrince
It's meaning #2 that Bannik is talking about. Rappers use that word a lot. But then again they also use the "n" word a lot.
deanhills
HalfBloodPrince wrote:
It's meaning #2 that Bannik is talking about. Rappers use that word a lot. But then again they also use the "n" word a lot.
Do rappers use it in a positive sense then? Is there a positive meaning of cracker when it is used in a racist sense? Or do rappers use it in a negative sense?
HalfBloodPrince
deanhills wrote:
HalfBloodPrince wrote:
It's meaning #2 that Bannik is talking about. Rappers use that word a lot. But then again they also use the "n" word a lot.
Do rappers use it in a positive sense then? Is there a positive meaning of cracker when it is used in a racist sense? Or do rappers use it in a negative sense?

Absolutely negative.
Bannik
Bikerman wrote:
Bannik wrote:
A).racism is a belief and I agree we cant make that illegal in any way....but there should be limits of where it is used because some racist beliefs are made from ignorance and I would rather not have such beliefs in lets say schools etc....also these beliefs could affect how you work and what you do at work like a doctor refusing too help a patient on his racist beliefs.
There ARE limits. There is a difference between having a belief and acting on those beliefs in an illegal way, or using them to justify illegality.
Turn your 'doctor' argument around - what about the black doctor who refused to treat a racist. Would that be OK?
Quote:
b) true...the origin is pure but the context it is used is still racist - lets say I go around calling black people Mondays, sure its sage and harmless but then I tell you its because "everyone hates Mondays" does that still make Monday and OK term too use?

and no I don't want Mondays illegal.
I'm not sure what your point is. If you don't want to make this an issue of law then what do you want? Most people I know don't use offensive language of that type. There are some who do. I don't condone it - just the opposite. I don't want them locked-up though.



firstly I never suggested that they should be jailed, my point about the monday term is because you said cracker is not a racist term(by itself), but what i suggested is that anything can be racist depending on the context it was used....and should be considered just as bad as something like the word "******" - this matters because ppl like COMEDIANS love too use cracker as a light hearted way too call white people, but i say its just as bad as me calling someone ******......

and no i have no rememdy for racism nor will i try too stop it cause you cant....all i am saying is that racism needs too be either totally controlled or be free with it in terms of what you do etc.
truespeed
You could also argue that there is a mindset that only white people can be racist. The use of the word nigg** (Which can't even by typed on here?) for instance,is used widely in the black community,in every day live,in song,in movies,but for a white person to use the same word there is always controversy.

Quentin Tarantino for instance got a lot of flack for use of the word in his movies,even though the word was always used in context with the characters. One of his main accusers was Spike Lee (A black director) who often uses the word himself in his own movies.

As for the word cracker,i had never even heard of it until i read this thread,it must be an Americanism.
Bikerman
Bannik wrote:
and no i have no rememdy for racism nor will i try too stop it cause you cant....all i am saying is that racism needs too be either totally controlled or be free with it in terms of what you do etc.
I'm not quite sure what you mean. We have agreed that you can't control racism (as a belief) legally (or at least that it would not be a good thing to try). So we have legislation based on actions - either violence or incitement to violence.

If you are suggesting that there is an uneven playing field and that black people are more able to use racist terms against whites than the other way around in the media, then that may well be so - I haven't really watched enough TV to tell. It wouldn't surprise me - nor would it particularly concern or offend me, given the history.
Bannik
Bikerman wrote:
Bannik wrote:
and no i have no rememdy for racism nor will i try too stop it cause you cant....all i am saying is that racism needs too be either totally controlled or be free with it in terms of what you do etc.
I'm not quite sure what you mean. We have agreed that you can't control racism (as a belief) legally (or at least that it would not be a good thing to try). So we have legislation based on actions - either violence or incitement to violence.

If you are suggesting that there is an uneven playing field and that black people are more able to use racist terms against whites than the other way around in the media, then that may well be so - I haven't really watched enough TV to tell. It wouldn't surprise me - nor would it particularly concern or offend me, given the history.


what I meant too say is that we have 2 options as humanity....

1 - we forbid racism is all forms ban it and not allow it too be used in any way, shape or form
2 - we allow racism under the term of freedom of beliefs etc...and that means all freedom on tv, in radio in jobs etc....

there is no grey line......and both choices have extreme negative outcomes, so we cant fight it


but why should history matter in terms of racism being allowed for some and not for others, racism is racism....
Bikerman
Bannik wrote:
what I meant too say is that we have 2 options as humanity....
1 - we forbid racism is all forms ban it and not allow it too be used in any way, shape or form
2 - we allow racism under the term of freedom of beliefs etc...and that means all freedom on tv, in radio in jobs etc....

there is no grey line......and both choices have extreme negative outcomes, so we cant fight it
But this is an entirely false dichotomy. Of course there are 'grey lines'.
Just because something is legal does not mean that it is socially acceptable. It is perfectly legal for me to walk into a pub and state that everyone drinking alcohol is a mental retard. It wouldn't be a particularly good idea, because it would be likely to get me into a spot of bother.
We don't need the blunt instrument of the law to decide as people, and societies, what we find acceptable.
Neither, by the way, do we need to allow every view to be aired on national media. In most cases it doesn't arise anyway, because most media is entirely dependant on advertising and large companies are very anxious to avoid alienating potential customers. Even in the media which doesn't depend on advertising - such as the BBC - there are broadcasting standards which go way beyond what is actually legal. There is nothing wrong with that per se. The right to hold a belief does not imply an equal 'right' to have that belief broadcast using the mass media.
If a person wishes to pay for the publication of a book which spouts some racist theory or other then I have absolutely no problem with that. If they expect that book to be reviewed in the serious media then that is a different matter, and I would expected the editor/reviewer/producer to have a view on that.
deanhills
Can one say then that ultimately racism is founded in our differences, maybe we need to look at how we deal with our differences, not only whether racism is right or wrong.

I think the only people who can genuinely be non-racists in the true sense of the word, are people that look exactly like one another, and are copies of one another and do not know about differences. As soon as you introduce individuals to them that look different, then the differences will give rise to racists. The differences will also be absorbed according to the character of the same-looking individuals. Perhaps it is human then to be racist? But equally human to resist it when people are being hurt by racism. It becomes a huge dilemma. So right now we say we have to accept everyone who is different to us. I like that. Racial tolerance. Would also be nice if we could have religious tolerance. Be more compassionate and accepting of our differences as human beings and less rigid, dogmatic and judgmental about our differences. I would say that racism comes from our differences, and if we can learn how to better deal with our differences, racism would become much less of a problem.
bigt
HalfBloodPrince wrote:
Earlier today, something happened to me that hasn't ever really happened to me in my life. My dad and I were in the car driving home, and stopped at a traffic light. We were in the middle lane and a middle aged white woman was in her car behind us. She suddenly started honking at us for no apparent reason; I thought maybe she wanted to squeeze into the right side lane to take a turn? Eventually she gets to the lane beside us (still stopped at that red light) and pulls down her window.

Don't you f**king asswipes know when to move your f**king brown asses?! Get the f**k out of our country you dirty f**king foreigners! And go back to the f**king hole you came from! *middle finger*

There was more, but pretty much the above reworded. Now had my dad not been there I would certainly have engaged in a royal Jerry Springer style cuss-off with that b*tch, but I somehow managed to keep my mouth shut because I think my dad would have been more disappointed in me for stooping down to her level.

Ironically, my skin is either the same color as hers or lighter, so racism doesn't just come down to skin color, does it? I'm Pakistani (I've never lived in Pakistan though) and this happened in Canada. Before today I'd never felt like I was the victim of any sort of racism, but now I think I finally understand what it might feel like to people who have to experience much more serious types of racism (when things get violent).

Have you ever had an experience like this? Is this really racism?


Maybe she was just some idiot driver, but I think it was an incident of racism b/c she threw in the color comment. She needs an attitude adjustment and driving lessons.

Racism is a way of thinking that is taught, not born with. Kids don't act different based on skin color unless racism is introduced to them. Racism is treating a person different based solely on skin color. It is wrong.
deanhills
bigt wrote:
She needs an attitude adjustment and driving lessons.
In more ways than racism, but that too of course. Road rage is not a good situation at all.
Kopernikus
I hate to bring up the point, but *are* there human races?

Races are defined as categories of thought, which have no real equivalent.
So, by definition, races are phenotypical, meaning they are catgories of appearence rather than real differences.

Now, if I say that all innuit/eskimos are short and stocky, am I a racist? Especially in a society which values slimness a a sign of willpower and success? At first I define races in an arbitrary way by some differences, and then I´m a racist if I point them out?

OTOH there are some functional differences in populations, not because of race but rather for geographical reasons. Isolated populations tend to develop distinguishing traits, which in time could lead to a different species altogether.

For practical reasons, am I a racist if I say, that innuit are better adapted to living in a cold climate than, say a massai? Is pointing out a difference raciscm?

I don´t see myself as particularily racist, but as every human being am to a certain degree distrustful towards people, who are different from my own population, a rather sane concept for all of human history. I have friends from many different cultures in Europe, America or Asia, but sometimes find myself still surprised by the way they react to certain situations. That is not to say they turned into monsters, suddenly, but that there *are* cultural differences, and for most of our history different looks meant different social and philosophical values, too.

But what *really* pisses me off is, that, being an Austrian myself, I can´t tell a stupid jewish person, that he is just plainly an idiot, because of automaticalle being called a racist nazi!
Bikerman
What you say about race is true - the idea that there are sharply defined racial groupings is nonsense.
As far as whether you are a racist or not - I think it is fairly easy to answer if you stick with the definition I gave earlier - "Racism is the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race."

Now, assuming that we can agree some sort of loose 'groupings' that we would call 'races' then you can test whether you are a racist or not for yourself by considering the above. From what you have written it is clear that you are not expressing racism.
deanhills
Bikerman wrote:
What you say about race is true - the idea that there are sharply defined racial groupings is nonsense.
As far as whether you are a racist or not - I think it is fairly easy to answer if you stick with the definition I gave earlier - "Racism is the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race."

Now, assuming that we can agree some sort of loose 'groupings' that we would call 'races' then you can test whether you are a racist or not for yourself by considering the above. From what you have written it is clear that you are not expressing racism.
I thought that race was something of perception. A difference in the colour of our skin. All of us are racists. We cannot help but notice the difference in the colour of our skin. Maybe there is positive racism and negative racism. Positive racism being natural fact that we have different colours of skin, perhaps even come from different cultures. However we do not see any special significance in the differences. Negative racism perhaps that one person thinks that the colour of their skin makes a difference. Some may think the colour of their skin makes them superior to someone else, others may (through learned behaviour) believe that the colour of their skin makes them inferior. Obviously in the example of this thread, the victims of the attack were not inferior. Perhaps they are positive racists, and the rage lady a negative racist. Both noticed the differences, however the victims looked at the differences from a positive point of view.
Bikerman
deanhills wrote:
Bikerman wrote:
What you say about race is true - the idea that there are sharply defined racial groupings is nonsense.
As far as whether you are a racist or not - I think it is fairly easy to answer if you stick with the definition I gave earlier - "Racism is the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race."
Now, assuming that we can agree some sort of loose 'groupings' that we would call 'races' then you can test whether you are a racist or not for yourself by considering the above. From what you have written it is clear that you are not expressing racism.
I thought that race was something of perception.
Err...yes, that was implicit in what I said.
Quote:
A difference in the colour of our skin.
Nope. That certainly won't do. A great deal of racism is very difficult to quantify in terms of skin colour.
Quote:
All of us are racists. We cannot help but notice the difference in the colour of our skin.
That does not make anyone a racist. Perhaps you should read the definition again. Pay particular attention to words like 'primary' and 'inherent'.
Soccerman
Helios wrote:
It's the lighter sort of racism. The bad stuff is when you're in a dark alley and a bunch of "locals" come to teach you a lesson of their country's history, so to speak.

Happened to me in foreign countries, after saying that I'm Jewish. I look completely european, but god forbid if I visit a country and say that I'm from Israel to the wrong person...

Needless to say that I lost most of my family more than 60 years ago because of racism...


What do ppl have against Israelies, i mean really, i don't see a difference from a colored, a caucasion, or a Israelie. What IS the difference?[/b][/list][/list][/code][/quote]
menino
racism is a funny thing, if you look at it from a different angle.

I've seen indians who hate other indians from a different state, including pakistanis and including arabs.
Also in the US, there is racism about people from north and south, as well as from east and west, and thats just apart from coloured folks.
Fact of the matter is if your white, and you hate blacks, after certain time, you will start hating other whites, and then eventually your own family... untill you end up hating yourself.
We are all humans and we have to live together as one.
liljp617
Soccerman wrote:
Helios wrote:
It's the lighter sort of racism. The bad stuff is when you're in a dark alley and a bunch of "locals" come to teach you a lesson of their country's history, so to speak.

Happened to me in foreign countries, after saying that I'm Jewish. I look completely european, but god forbid if I visit a country and say that I'm from Israel to the wrong person...

Needless to say that I lost most of my family more than 60 years ago because of racism...


What do ppl have against Israelies, i mean really, i don't see a difference from a colored, a caucasion, or a Israelie. What IS the difference?


It isn't really racism against Israelis today. It's more of their actions as of late and the complete lack of accountability they're held to. Along with the hypocrisy of their allies.
deanhills
menino wrote:
Fact of the matter is if your white, and you hate blacks, after certain time, you will start hating other whites, and then eventually your own family... untill you end up hating yourself.
We are all humans and we have to live together as one.
Maybe there is a thin dividing line here between racism and prejudice, prejudice being defined as:
Quote:
Detriment or injury caused to a person by the preconceived, unfavorable conviction of another or others
This would be applicable to all human beings.

Racism would be prejudice on the grounds of race.
Soccerman
liljp617 wrote:
Soccerman wrote:
Helios wrote:
It's the lighter sort of racism. The bad stuff is when you're in a dark alley and a bunch of "locals" come to teach you a lesson of their country's history, so to speak.

Happened to me in foreign countries, after saying that I'm Jewish. I look completely european, but god forbid if I visit a country and say that I'm from Israel to the wrong person...

Needless to say that I lost most of my family more than 60 years ago because of racism...


What do ppl have against Israelies, i mean really, i don't see a difference from a colored, a caucasion, or a Israelie. What IS the difference?


It isn't really racism against Israelis today. It's more of their actions as of late and the complete lack of accountability they're held to. Along with the hypocrisy of their allies.


If you think about it this way, what first started racism? Why do people think that they are better than other people, because they are a different color? What if everyone thought they were better than every1 else? Please answer these questions.
BinahZ
Without turning this into a middle east political forum, I disagree with those who think it isnt racism.
It is exactly the same genre Helios is speaking of and has been going on for millenia. The players change but the story doesnt. Racism of sorts exist in our world. Only when we can rise above it will be truly able to say it is not at the root of many of the issues of unrest in the world today.
liljp617 stated:
Quote:
It isn't really racism against Israelis today. It's more of their actions as of late and the complete lack of accountability they're held to. Along with the hypocrisy of their allies.


sometimes racism is at the root of our perception of how we judge another's actions

We saw much of this in regard to the black population in the US a few years back. They were prejudged in action and intent because of their race. Sad to see it spread and be perpetuated world wide.
sum12nv
this is racism as she discriminated against you...racism is when one person discriminates against someone who is of a different race as theyfeel more superior.
The-Nisk
When I was a kid, I knew what racism was, but I always thought it was a thing of the past, something only used nowadays for comedy purposes. However when I moved country I found out the hard way, how real it is. While it is natural to stereotype people to some degree (it is something foreign, your reaction is to be on guard) and feel different towards those stereotypes, I think it is up to our intelligence to be concious of it and not to let it affect our judgement.

But, I really overestimated the human race when I expected others to share my view. People don't think. People want to believe that just because they are born someplace they have more right to be there than say a person that wasn't born there. A ridiculous concept, an instinct of a primitive animal. Being a self-proclaimed cosmopolitan (think of what the word implies), I also found the concept of nationality pathetic. I've often been told "get out of my country", which always tempted me to reply: "not before you get off my planet" (and even so, not because I have any particular right to live there, but i don't really get a choice, neither can i go someplace else), but I tend to turn a deaf ear to low-lives. Nationality is just an illusion made up by and shared by a small mass of people to have some an imagined similarity so they won't feel as entirely alone as they are and to isolate a much bigger mass of people. Then the arrogance comes into play and the belief in the greatness of the country is born, then that there's something special in the blood of the people who live in the same piece of land, apart from the inbred arrogance.

I will give credit to the fact that there are differences between races, since humans living in different climates etc adapted accordingly.

What's the most funny thing however, that all the racism I endured was because I have an accent when I speak English (incidentally I probably know the language better than the people who try to make fun of that fact, or some other racist comment), apart from that I should be able to fit in, in any country where having white skin is common and English is widely spoken.

I believe the only grounds for justifiable differentiation is intelligence. Although I tend to discriminate any sort of religion (apart maybe from Buddhism) as a failure in character/intelligence, but that aside. That's me done with my little rant.
deanhills
I see some of the racism as belonging to a clan in different variations and to different degrees, such as we see at schools when kids click together and bully other kids. Sometimes there is positive racism in that the kids tease one another's differences, with an undertone of accepting them, but there is also negative racism where kids hit on kids who are from different cultures, beliefs and races. I think we have come a very long way from the sixties when King did all his marches and they had to work very hard to fight racism, however there is still some of it alive and kicking. Not only white on black racism, but the other way round as well, i.e. racism inverted such as when the Professor friend of Obama's from Harvard University hit on the young white policeman. I saw it as racism in reverse.
shabazz
Helios wrote:
It's the lighter sort of racism. The bad stuff is when you're in a dark alley and a bunch of "locals" come to teach you a lesson of their country's history, so to speak.

Happened to me in foreign countries, after saying that I'm Jewish. I look completely european, but god forbid if I visit a country and say that I'm from Israel to the wrong person...

Needless to say that I lost most of my family more than 60 years ago because of racism...
JUST NOT FACTUAL: THERE ARE AFRICANS WHO HAVE TRIBAL WARS AGAINST EACH OTHER BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL,SPIRITUAL,AND CULTURAL DIFFERENCES,BUT YOU MUST HAVE THE POWER OVER AN-ENTIRE RACE OF PEOPLE,ECONOMICALLY,RELIGIOUSLY,SOCIALLY,AND POLITICALLY,TO COMPLETELY NEGATE THEIR PURPOSE ON THIS PLANET. ALL CAUCASIANS ARE BIOLOGICALLY RELATED. WHETHER JEW,PROTESTANT,CATHOLIC,OR MORMON,THE SAME RACE CANNOT BE UNDER THE SAME UMBRELLA,AND RACIST,THEY CAN BE PREJUDICE,OR A BIGOT,BUT A RACIST IS A PERSON WHO IS LEGISLATING,TACTICS THAT DEPRIVE ANOTHER RACES FREEDOM,JUSTICE AND EQUALITY.
silverdown
I define racism as aggression towards another for there own personal gain such has pranks, jokes , humility, richness , political view and so on. People do it because they know other MAY follow. If no one follows it slowly dies off.
yagnyavalkya
Having read all that is man hating women or women hating men racism?
Related topics
How would you personaly define a "quality" post?
What do your define as Service Learning?
Why the Democrats don't have any great leaders either..
War on Terror?
Do we need Religions?
A racist in everyone
Racial Equality
Define Religion?
Can someone clear a few things up for me please
Racism in politics..
racism
Cycles and the decline of creativity
Can you define wingnut?
Interesting Definition of Racism
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Lifestyle and News -> Philosophy and Religion

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2011 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.