Does the observer effect disprove an omniscient being?

ocalhoun

So, some things in quantum physics are affected when observed, and cannot be observed without affecting them.
The act of looking at something can change what it is, make it choose one state or another to 'really' be in.

If there was an omniscient being in the universe though, wouldn't every single particle and sub-particle be observed at all times?

To sum it up:
-If there were an omniscient being in the universe, it would be impossible for anything to be in an indeterminate, un-observed, state.
-Sometimes things are, apparently, in indeterminate states.
-Therefore, there cannot be an omniscient being.

Don't know if anybody has tried looking at it from this angle before, but I'd be interested to hear what you think of it.

Bikerman

Voodoocat

Unfortunately Schrödinger stuffed the omnipotent being into a box and now we will never know the answer Shocked

Stubru Freak

Of course it doesn't. Nothing can disprove an omniscient, omnipotent being... It can just adjust all particles to act like they follow the laws of physics, while actually they don't.

That's the whole problem with discussing religion. Everything is possible, because god is omnipotent! You can explain anything that way.

A debate of religion, science, and more
A question of faith - is faith immoral?
Proof god exists
What if God does exist. Can sin exist exist then? No?
Castro: U.S. hasn't responded to Katrina offer

BUSH'S Poll Numbers Up
A paper on an abstract musical idea. Cary Angell
Why I think iTunes is horrible
how can you reconcile an omniscient being with free will?
Atheism is not scientific.

Athiests just may have it right
Creationism in School?
If you could change one thing about yourself ?
I have seen the GOD!
Ways to make hell good?