I'm working a booklet came from France: I have to change some texts.
I'm wondering: why the French have done ALL the pictures in eps format??, Even there is no vector in the area (not even a path!)
I founded some 86Mb eps images and when I saved them with LZW tiff, they reached 29Mb. The story is even more ugly as the "Collect" of pictures have almost 2 gigs! After several re-saving in TIFF LZW, I reduced the size of that folder at 577Mb.
So, am I missing something here? Why EPS files and not TIFF?
However, the manner of their work was... When you are doing an A4 format, why are you using pictures... sometimes with 80cm on a side?
with 4 pictures you can fill a CD, the entire booklet can fill a DVD. People do not understand: if you have material A4, make pictures no more than A4 size - you gain time when it's about to do pdf's, production will not cursing, you'll work with easier with the files...
I'm wondering: why the French have done ALL the pictures in eps format??, Even there is no vector in the area (not even a path!)
I founded some 86Mb eps images and when I saved them with LZW tiff, they reached 29Mb. The story is even more ugly as the "Collect" of pictures have almost 2 gigs! After several re-saving in TIFF LZW, I reduced the size of that folder at 577Mb.
So, am I missing something here? Why EPS files and not TIFF?
However, the manner of their work was... When you are doing an A4 format, why are you using pictures... sometimes with 80cm on a side?
with 4 pictures you can fill a CD, the entire booklet can fill a DVD. People do not understand: if you have material A4, make pictures no more than A4 size - you gain time when it's about to do pdf's, production will not cursing, you'll work with easier with the files...
