FRIHOSTFORUMSSEARCHFAQTOSBLOGSDIRECTORY
You are invited to Log in or Register a Frihost Account!

UK Jewish lawmaker: Israeli forces acting like Nazis

 


handfleisch
UK Jewish lawmaker: Israeli forces acting like Nazis

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/01/16/uk.israel.debate/

I didn't say it, but Gerald Kaufman, whose family went thru the Holocaust, did.
palavra

Jewish-American Professor Norman Finkelstein has said Israel, a state built on the ashes of the Holocaust, is now committing a holocaust against Palestinians in Gaza.

Quote:
In your famous book, “The Holocaust Industry,” you argue that the state of Israel, one of the world’s most formidable military powers, with a horrendous human rights record, cast itself as a victim state in order to garner immunity to criticism. Have we seen this during the Gaza operation?

They tried to use the Holocaust; it was funny in a very sick way. The leader of the American Jewish Committee, David Harris, wrote an article, and he said it is no coincidence that this war in Gaza is occurring around Jan. 27, which is Holocaust Remembrance Day. He wants to pretend some connection. In fact there is a connection, and the connection is Israel is committing a holocaust in Gaza. But that is not the connection he had in mind. He wanted to play the Holocaust card; I think that it is not working very much anymore. It was clear that during this last massacre in Gaza, liberal Jewish public opinion turned against Israel. If you look at the petitions, demonstrations, letters, support to Israel, not only in the international community but also among the Jewish community, is diminishing. So the Holocaust card, the anti-Semitic card, is not working as efficiently as it was working once.

You will probably be called anti-Semitic as well.

I do not think this propaganda is successful anymore.

In your book “Beyond Chutzpah,” you argue that Israel was created after the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, but the question whether it was premeditated remains to be answered. If it is premeditated, then can it be called genocide?

Well, it was premeditated, and I think the record is pretty clear. Even Israel’s former minister of foreign affairs, Shlomo Ben-Ami, in his book published several years ago called “Scars of War,” said that it was quite clear that it was a premeditated expulsion in 1948 and it was anchored in the Zionist philosophy of transfer. Ethnic cleansings are ethnic cleansings, and they are war crimes.

Why do you think US media is so one-sided and so pro-Israeli?

I think it has two components. First of all, Israel serves American interests in the region and American media always give a free pass to those states that serve American interests. That is the overall picture and not much different from other parts of the world. The horrendous governments like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, they also get free passes in the American media. This is the larger context. And there is, of course, the secondary factor, which is the ethnic element. In many of these newspapers and the media in general, there is a large Jewish presence, and there is a sense of Jewish ethnic solidarity, which plays a role. But I think we have to qualify the secondary factor in two ways. We should not lose sight of the primary factor, which is Israel is the client state of US. No. 2: In this past war, the liberal Jewish population mostly under the age of 40 completely defected from the war, the massacre. They have been opposed to the massacres from the first day.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been very critical of Israel on Gaza, and some American circles lambasted him in return. What do you think about his stance?

I wish he had done further. I wish he had gone as far as Qatar, Mauritania, Bolivia and Venezuela in breaking diplomatic relations with that lunatic state. But as far as he has gone, the point on which he stands, has been terrific. And I was glad to see Hamas respected the gestures of the Turkish government and said they would be willing to have Turkish troops stationed on “our border.” That is a very high praise for the Turkish government.

Turks are showing Palestinians compassion, decency and justice. All the Turkish people should take pride of this stance as was the case on the eve of the American invasion of Iraq in 2003. It was the Turkish people and government who showed courage. Ninety-six percent of Turkish people opposed the war in Iraq. The Turkish government refused to give Americans use of their land to attack Iraq. Now Turkish people and Turkish government are redeeming themselves again by standing on what is right, what is decent and what is just. I say the highest praise for Erdoğan and the Turkish people.

How do you feel about Israel’s operation in Gaza personally as the son of Holocaust survivors?

It has been a long time since I felt any emotional connection with the state of Israel, which relentlessly and brutally and inhumanly keeps these vicious, murderous wars. It is a vandal state. There is a Russian writer who once described vandal states as Genghis Khan with a telegraph. Israel is Genghis Khan with a computer. I feel no emotion of affinity with that state. I have some good friends and their families there, and of course I would not want any of them to be hurt. That said, sometimes I feel that Israel has come out of the boils of the hell, a satanic state. Ninety percent of the population continues to cheer, to exalt and feel proud and heroic. They send a Sherman tank to a playground and torch children. Is this heroism? Is this courage?

You were not allowed to teach at DePaul University despite a very good academic record and also had some problems in getting your Ph.D. from Princeton. Why?

Well, I had some problems. I really cannot discuss my problems in the face of what is going on in Gaza. It will be so silly, trivial and stupid. Three hundred or so children -- they were incinerated to death; phosphor bombs were thrown indiscriminately over Gaza. Everything these people wanted to rebuild, rebuild and rebuild was destroyed again. This state invaded in 1978, again in 1982, again in 1993, again in 1996, again in 2006, and 2008, and it always destroys, destroys and destroys. And then these satanic narcissistic people throw their hands up in the air and ask, “Why doesn’t anybody love us? Why don’t our neighbors want us to be here?” Why would they?


http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=164483
ThePolemistis
handfleisch wrote:
UK Jewish lawmaker: Israeli forces acting like Nazis

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/01/16/uk.israel.debate/

I didn't say it, but Gerald Kaufman, whose family went thru the Holocaust, did.



Funny how the story highlights on the same page says:

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/01/16/uk.israel.debate/ wrote:
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
Jewish UK lawmaker calls on Israel to talk to Hamas, a "deeply nasty organization"
UK government: "Hamas made a brutal choice to step up attacks" on civilians
UK PM calls shelling of U.N.'s main aid HQ compound in Gaza "indefensible"
UK has seen several protests since conflict began, both pro- and anti-Israel


No mention of Israeli soldiers acting like Nazis even tho the whole article is based on that.
CNN is deeply pro-Israeli whenever they have the chance to state their own opinion.!!!
ParsaAkbari
I slightly agree with him, however i belive the term "holocaust" is extreamly too effective in this situation.

The jews do not want to kill thier muslims, they want to take the land that they reside on, the land that they believe is "rightfully thiers"
handfleisch
Interesting development -- Israel's foreign minister is worried about getting nailed for war crimes while travelling abroad, like Pinochet was. (I've heard that Kissinger has similar concerns.)

http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/1,2506,L-3659908,00.html

Quote:
Livni's Belgium trip almost cancelled due to lawsuit concerns

Foreign minister's visit to Brussels nearly canceled due to report she may face legal action over Israeli offensive in Gaza. Report deemed false, Livni to address EU foreign ministers as scheduled
Roni Sofer

Israel's concerns about possible international lawsuits following Operation Cast Lead is apparently growing, as even the fate of Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni's trip to Brussels remained vague until the very last minute, fearing she may face legal action in Belgium for alleged war crimes.
ocalhoun
handfleisch wrote:
Report deemed false, Livni to address EU foreign ministers as scheduled

You do read the articles you post, right?
handfleisch
ocalhoun wrote:
handfleisch wrote:
Report deemed false, Livni to address EU foreign ministers as scheduled

You do read the articles you post, right?

Troll, once again it's your lack of comprehension and posting-without-thinking that is the issue. If you had understood the article and my post, you would know that it is exactly as I said -- her trip was indeed postponed over concerns she might be charged with a war crime in Brussels. The issue is not that this time it turned out not to happen, but that she is concerned it could, just as it did to Ariel Sharon, and just as Pinochet was indeed arrested and detained.
Quote:

Jerusalem has even issued a travel advisory for top IDF officials, urging them to refrain from visiting several European countries.

Pretty much the whole article is on exactly the subject I posted about. Jeez, man, have you got nothing better to do or point to make? To paraphrase, it's time to put away your childish posts.
sondosia
Maybe the reason Jews are afraid to travel to Europe is because some people there think it's appropriate to express their opinions by defacing Jewish places of worship and attacking rabbis on the streets.

http://jta.org/news/article/2009/01/21/1002413/spike-of-attack-prompts-renewed-fears-for-french-jews
http://www.ejpress.org/article/news/germany/31624
http://www.ejpress.org/article/news/eastern_europe/21256
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3390086,00.html

Find me one example of a Jew in Europe or the U.S. defacing a mosque or attacking an imam.
handfleisch
sondosia wrote:
Maybe the reason Jews are afraid to travel to Europe is because some people there think it's appropriate to express their opinions by defacing Jewish places of worship and attacking rabbis on the streets..


Uh, maybe not; nice try to dishonestly sidetrack the discussion though. This is about Israeli war crimes, not persecution of the Jews. I have had plenty of meetings with Jewish people in Europe -- they were not afraid. But in a better world, international war criminals of any stripe would be afraid to travel for fear of facing justice in the form of a fair trial, which is a lot more than the slaughtered innocents, and the thousands of people with totally ruined lives, got in Gaza.
GLOBALSTRATEGY
The comparison of the just and defensive actions of the IDF in Gaza are an insult to the victims of the Nazi holocaus, an insult to reason, a disgusting and obscene distorsion. There has been no genocide the same as, there was no genocide in the 2002 Jenin battle. Do you remember?: Hundred of deads! Genocide! And when the anti-Zionist hysteria was over, the truth came out: just some 52 Palestinians (UN final numbers, the vast majority of them armed gunmen) were killed (not enough I would add), as were 23 IDF soldiers. The "destruction of the city of Jenin" turned out to be a battle in a very small area of the city. It was a legitimate militar operation as the one we have had in Gaza. The Strip is a relatively small area of 360 km2, were only the IDF air force operated in the skies, if the IDF would have had targeted the civilians, or aimed to produce a massive killing of the unarmed population, the results would have been very different. But fortunately for the Gazan population this methods only existed in the anti-Zionist cheap propaganda. During the eight years of continuous bombardments of civilian targets in the Israeli urban and rural areas of the Negev desert, where were the protests of all those "peace lovers" and "humanists" that no attack the Jewish state with such energy? Where were the protesters when real genocides were committed in Darfur and other places? Where were they to protest the over 1,100 Israelis killed and many thousands more wounded as a result of the murderous violence since September 2000?
The Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera quoted a doctor at the main Shifa hospital "It's possible that the death toll in Gaza was 500 or 600 at the most, mainly youths aged 17 to 23 who were enlisted by Hamas – who sent them to their deaths".(Cfr. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/israel/4317210/Israel-seizes-on-claims-Gaza-death-toll-has-been-exaggerated.html) But the local government in Catalunya canceled an Holocaust remembrance ceremony because -they said- a Holocaust was going on in Gaza. Stupidity, ignorance or vulgar anti-semitism? Probably all of them.
ocalhoun
handfleisch wrote:
Livni to address EU foreign ministers as scheduled

handfleisch wrote:

her trip was indeed postponed

Now I really do have a lack of comprehension!
How can it be both postponed and as scheduled?
Xanatos
Lets see...
Holocaust=mass genocide of people who could not fight back for the express purpose of purifying the planet.
Israel-Palestine Conflicts=Battles between armed gunman with collatoral damage, a war that has waged on for a very very long time.

I don't see the comparison.
sondosia
handfleisch wrote:
sondosia wrote:
Maybe the reason Jews are afraid to travel to Europe is because some people there think it's appropriate to express their opinions by defacing Jewish places of worship and attacking rabbis on the streets..


Uh, maybe not; nice try to dishonestly sidetrack the discussion though. This is about Israeli war crimes, not persecution of the Jews. I have had plenty of meetings with Jewish people in Europe -- they were not afraid. But in a better world, international war criminals of any stripe would be afraid to travel for fear of facing justice in the form of a fair trial, which is a lot more than the slaughtered innocents, and the thousands of people with totally ruined lives, got in Gaza.


So apparently I need to explain my rationale for posting a valid point rather than simply posting it.

You and others were insinuating that Israelis are afraid to go to Europe because they would be considered war criminals. I'm arguing that they're afraid to go to Europe because part of the European Muslim community doesn't know how to express opinions peacefully.

I don't know which Jewish Europeans you've talked to, but it definitely wasn't the rabbis who could've lost their lives. It definitely wasn't the Jews who showed up to synagogue services one morning to see disgusting anti-semitic remarks scrawled on the walls. Did you even bother to read the articles I posted before calling my opinion a "dishonest sidetrack"?

I would suggest that rather than posting fifty anti-Israel threads on this forum, you actually examine both sides of the issue first. And writing off others' thoughts as irrelevant sidetracks is NOT part of examining the whole issue.

I'm not denying that what happened to INNOCENT Gaza civilians is horrible--but it's war. Not every war is genocide. Most of the Palestinians who died in the Gaza war were Hamas militants. Some were civilians. Such is the price we pay for war; such is the price we pay for the existence of groups like Hamas in this world.
handfleisch
ocalhoun wrote:
handfleisch wrote:
Livni to address EU foreign ministers as scheduled

handfleisch wrote:

her trip was indeed postponed

Now I really do have a lack of comprehension!
How can it be both postponed and as scheduled?


You really have nowhere to go, do you? So you try to pick apart word choice, completely disregarding the points. No wonder you're whining for "mutual respect" on the other thread. You've discredited yourself with your Obama-is-terrorist-sympathizer and liberals-write-the-history-books-so-don't-trust-it views, and with the new Prez quickly ushering in some basic sanity into federal policy, people are sick of putting up with wingnuts; hence the lack of "mutual respect" for you.

On edit: post here for respect http://www.rushlimbaughforum.com/
handfleisch
sondosia wrote:

So apparently I need to explain my rationale for posting a valid point rather than simply posting it.

You and others were insinuating that Israelis are afraid to go to Europe because they would be considered war criminals. I'm arguing that they're afraid to go to Europe because part of the European Muslim community doesn't know how to express opinions peacefully.

I don't know which Jewish Europeans you've talked to, but it definitely wasn't the rabbis who could've lost their lives. It definitely wasn't the Jews who showed up to synagogue services one morning to see disgusting anti-semitic remarks scrawled on the walls. Did you even bother to read the articles I posted before calling my opinion a "dishonest sidetrack"?

I would suggest that rather than posting fifty anti-Israel threads on this forum, you actually examine both sides of the issue first. And writing off others' thoughts as irrelevant sidetracks is NOT part of examining the whole issue.

I'm not denying that what happened to INNOCENT Gaza civilians is horrible--but it's war. Not every war is genocide. Most of the Palestinians who died in the Gaza war were Hamas militants. Some were civilians. Such is the price we pay for war; such is the price we pay for the existence of groups like Hamas in this world.


You're still wrong. No one is insinuating anything; I posted an article about Israeli gov't officials being hesitant to travel to Europe due to the possibility of being arrested on international war crime charges, similar to how Pinochet was. For you to say the Foreign Minister of Israel is nervous about going due to Europe because of graffiti is ridiculous. For you to yell anti-Semiticism in answer to charges of war crimes is vulgar and dishonest.
ocalhoun
handfleisch wrote:


You're still wrong.

That's a new low... Really, we could infer that without you actually having to type it. In fact, inference isn't really even needed... we would do just as well simply assuming you felt that way.

handfleisch wrote:
ocalhoun wrote:
handfleisch wrote:
Livni to address EU foreign ministers as scheduled

handfleisch wrote:

her trip was indeed postponed

Now I really do have a lack of comprehension!
How can it be both postponed and as scheduled?


You really have nowhere to go, do you? So you try to pick apart word choice, completely disregarding the points.


I do not pick apart word choice.
I pick apart contradictions.
You're still telling me two opposite things are both true, no matter what particular words you used to express it.

Let me change that ...
ocalhoun wrote:
How can it be both delayed and on-time?

You can insert any synonymous words you like there, but the problem still exists... one of these statements must be false.
handfleisch
ocalhoun wrote:

You can insert any synonymous words you like there, but the problem still exists... one of these statements must be false.

Only the saddest of trolls would spend so much time harping on the difference between a delay in a trip and a delay in a confirmation of a trip, as in "Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni's trip to Brussels remained vague until the very last minute" while ignoring the rest of the sentence, "fearing she may face legal action in Belgium for alleged war crimes," which is the point of the article and thread.
ocalhoun
handfleisch wrote:
"Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni's trip to Brussels remained vague until the very last minute"

I pay attention to this because it is a provable or disprovable fact.
Quote:
while ignoring the rest of the sentence, "fearing she may face legal action in Belgium for alleged war crimes," which is the point of the article and thread.

I ignore this because it would seem impossible for the writer of the article to know what, if anything she was fearing, or indeed, what her motivations were at all. Is the article writer a mind-reader, or is he just making inferences that would be better left for the reader to make?
GLOBALSTRATEGY
"For close to a month, the UN accused the Israel of hitting the educational compound ran by its Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, which was sheltering more than 1,300 Gazans as the IDF battled Hamas in the camp on January 6." (...) "At the time UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called the IDF attack "outrageous" and demanded an investigation.

But on Tuesday, the UN's Office for Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) slipped a "clarification" notice on the head of its weekly field report from Gaza.

It noted that its January 6 field report had stated that an IDF shell hit outside the school, causing fatalities. Its January 7 field report, however, stated that the shell hit the school.

"The humanitarian coordinator would like to clarify that the shelling, and all of the fatalities, took place outside rather than inside the school," the original field report stated.

It was publicized in the aftermath of a Toronto Globe and Mail article that reported that the IDF had not attacked the school. " (...) "...defense officials said it was not certain that the number of casualties reported by the UN, 43, was accurate and that Military Intelligence had noticed Hamas attempts to cover up the identity of those killed in the strike.

"We know of at least three terrorists among the dead," one official said. "It is clear that there were more people killed but Hamas has been covering up their identities."

Source: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1233304687916&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
deanhills
GLOBALSTRATEGY wrote:
"For close to a month, the UN accused the Israel of hitting the educational compound ran by its Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, which was sheltering more than 1,300 Gazans as the IDF battled Hamas in the camp on January 6." (...) "At the time UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called the IDF attack "outrageous" and demanded an investigation.

But on Tuesday, the UN's Office for Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) slipped a "clarification" notice on the head of its weekly field report from Gaza.

It noted that its January 6 field report had stated that an IDF shell hit outside the school, causing fatalities. Its January 7 field report, however, stated that the shell hit the school.

"The humanitarian coordinator would like to clarify that the shelling, and all of the fatalities, took place outside rather than inside the school," the original field report stated.

It was publicized in the aftermath of a Toronto Globe and Mail article that reported that the IDF had not attacked the school. " (...) "...defense officials said it was not certain that the number of casualties reported by the UN, 43, was accurate and that Military Intelligence had noticed Hamas attempts to cover up the identity of those killed in the strike.

"We know of at least three terrorists among the dead," one official said. "It is clear that there were more people killed but Hamas has been covering up their identities."

Source: http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1233304687916&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


Thanks for contributing this Globalstrategy. Makes great sense. Also indicates that one should be careful to make judgments on the basis of media reports, and let the International Courts sort things out.
Related topics

The Real Reason - Israel Attacks Gaza
Holocaust Memorial Day Jan.27: Remember the Roma (Gypsies)
Gaza gunmen flee behind human shield protest
Islam: Cruelty
Israel: Cruelty

Stop it!
Israel started this war, broke ceasefire first
Intelligent Design?Or Evolution?
Alternate Realities
Uranus has a blue ring

The Middle East Conflict
The RISE of Islam!!
Quantum Physics
What the hell is happening in Lebanon (Protests In Beirut)
Resistivity: A Question
Reply to topic    Frihost Forum Index -> Lifestyle and News -> Discuss World News

FRIHOST HOME | FAQ | TOS | ABOUT US | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
© 2005-2007 Frihost, forums powered by phpBB.